Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lennard-Jones, generally system

The Morse function which is given above was obtained from a study of bonding in gaseous systems, and dris part of Swalin s derivation should probably be replaced with a Lennard-Jones potential as a better approximation. The general idea of a variable diffusion step in liquids which is more nearly akin to diffusion in gases than the earlier treatment, which was based on the notion of vacant sites as in solids, remains as a valuable suggestion. [Pg.293]

In Fig. 1, various elements involved with the development of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms are illustrated. Generally, the objective of this effort is to predict macroscopic phenomena, e.g., species concentration profiles and heat release in a chemical reactor, from the knowledge of fundamental chemical and physical parameters, together with a mathematical model of the process. Some of the fundamental chemical parameters of interest are the thermochemistry of species, i.e., standard state heats of formation (A//f(To)), and absolute entropies (S(Tq)), and temperature-dependent specific heats (Cp(7)), and the rate parameter constants A, n, and E, for the associated elementary reactions (see Eq. (1)). As noted above, evaluated compilations exist for the determination of these parameters. Fundamental physical parameters of interest may be the Lennard-Jones parameters (e/ic, c), dipole moments (fi), polarizabilities (a), and rotational relaxation numbers (z ,) that are necessary for the calculation of transport parameters such as the viscosity (fx) and the thermal conductivity (k) of the mixture and species diffusion coefficients (Dij). These data, together with their associated uncertainties, are then used in modeling the macroscopic behavior of the chemically reacting system. The model is then subjected to sensitivity analysis to identify its elements that are most important in influencing predictions. [Pg.99]

The Lennard-Jones potential continues to be used in many force fields, particularly those targeted for use in large systems, e.g., biomolecular force fields. In more general force fields targeted at molecules of small to medium size, slightly more complicated functional forms, arguably having more physical justification, tend to be used (computational times for small molecules are so short dial the efficiency of the Lennard-Jones potential is of little consequence). Such forms include the Morse potential [Eq. (2.5)] and the Hill potential... [Pg.30]

At variance from the HS system, it had been observed that PY is not as accurate for attractive potentials. Hence, an alternative closure has been derived and consists in a generalization of the MSA closure [49,50], This has been feasible by incorporating the division scheme introduced by Weeks et al. [51] for the (12-6) Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluid composed of particles interacting through the potential... [Pg.20]

Application of DFT as a general methodology to classical systems was introduced by Ebner et al. (1976) in modeling the interfacial properties of a Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluid. The basis of all DFTs is that the Helmholtz free energy of an open system can be expressed as a unique functional of the density distribution of the constituent molecules. The equilibrium density distribution of the molecules is obtained by minimizing the appropriate free energy. [Pg.136]

In many force fields, truncation schemes are often used to reduce the number of non-bonded electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions that need to be calculated. Such schemes, are readily incorporated into the.inter-action Hamiltonian either by omitting all interactions that have a distance greater than some cutoff or by multiplying the appropriate interactions by a tapering function that reduces the interactions to zero beyond a certain distance. It is to be noted that in some hybrid force fields (see, for example, [35]) the electrostatic interaction terms are not included and the QM/MM interaction is due solely to the Lennard-Jones terms (and link-atoms if they are present). This could be a reasonable approximation in non-polar systems (such as the transition metal complexes for which some of these force fields were developed) but it will not be sufficiently accurate in the general case. [Pg.140]


See other pages where Lennard-Jones, generally system is mentioned: [Pg.226]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.4028]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.185]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



Lennard

Lennard-Jones

Lennard-Jones system

Lennard-Jones, generally

© 2024 chempedia.info