Lateral pressure distribution

The observed pattern of lateral pressure distribution between the defined hydraulic compartments reflects lack of pressure communication across the major northeast trending faults separating the compartments. 

Fig. 6. Interpreted lateral pressure distribution and hydraulic compartments.

Conclusion Ablation of the VM did not cause a lateral shift in patellar tracking, or an increase in lateral pressure distribution in the patellofemoral joint, as has been suggested clinically and anecdotally. It is not known whether this result would also hold for the human knee, but it does raise the question why clinical treatments of patellofemoral joint pain are concerned primarily with strengthening VM, despite a lack of direct evidence that VM strengthening will alter patellar tracking and/or patellofemoral contact pressure distributions. 

Besides, as illustrated in Fig. 18b, earthquake motions with high peak amplitude of base acceleration would cause higher nail forces along nails. There is considerable difference between the values of nail forces in the fifth row of naUs. Furthermore, the earth lateral pressure distribution behind the wall facing for different earthquake motions is depicted in Fig. 19, and it can be concluded that earth pressure will increase as the base excitation peak amplitude rises. The observed pattern in earth lateral distribution could be interpreted due to stage construction of soil-nailed structures. 

In summary, an object s blast loading has two components. The first is a transient pressure distribution induced by the overpressure of the blast wave. This component of blast loading is determined primarily by reflection and lateral rarefaction of the reflected overpressure. The height and duration of reflected overpressure are determined by the peak side-on overpressure of the blast wave and the lateral dimensions of the object, respectively. The Blast loading of objects with substantial... 

Further reduction of Pj has no effect on the flow in the pipeline. The pressure distribution along the length of the pipe remains unaltered and the pressure at its outlet remains at Pw. The gas, on leaving the pipe, expands laterally and its pressure falls to the reservoir pressure P2 ... 

An experiment was conducted in a low speed gust tunnel in which steady and unsteady pressure distributions over the surface of a model cooling tower were measured. Attention is concentrated on the spectra of pressure fluctuations at a section near the throat of the tower. The effects of boundary layer, wake and incident wake on the spectra of pressure fluctuations at points on the tower are demonstrated, and the effects of lateral turbulence identified by varying the amplitude of the input to the gust actuators. 10 refs, cited. 

Furthermore, when the cone-and-plate rheometer is outfitted with pressure taps at various radial positions, the experimentally obtained pressure distribution is found to be increasing with decreasing radial distance. This, as we will see later, enables us to compute the secondary normal stress difference, namely, x22 — T33, where direction 3 is the third neutral spatial direction. 

Xiang and Anderson [48] proposed a statistical mechanical theory that relates distribution properties of solutes within the interface to the size, shape, and orientation of the solute and the structure of the interface. In this model, the lateral pressure as obtained from a MD simulation and solute-solvent interaction parameters were used to calculate distributions in the interface. 

Hydrodynamic conditions in a basin may in part result from tectonic forces. Ge and Garven (1989) applied a numerical model of coupled tectonic- and gravity-induced flow to evaluate the relative importance of tectonic influence on groundwater pressure and flow in an otherwise gravity-induced flow system in a hypothetical foreland basin. Forbes et al. (1992) included an evaluation of lateral compression in their numerical reconstruction of the present-day pressure distribution in the Venture Field, Eastern Canada. 

One-dimensional models of overpressure have been carried out in several sedimentary basins (Gibson, 1958 Bredehoeft and Hanshaw, 1968 Smith, 1971 Sharp and Domineco, 1976 Bishop, 1979 Keith and Rimstidt, 1985 Thome and Watts, 1989 Mudford et al., 1991). The predictive value of such studies are, however, limited and Haltenbanken is a good example of how important the lateral drainage can be for the pressure distribution. A thorough... 

Fig. 6 shows a map of the lateral formation pressure distribution of the field. 

For experimental determination the flow pattern produced by the stirrer was initially visualized using different photographic methods (e.g. [574, 497]), but hydraulic probes were also used to determine the pressure distribution (e.g. [135]) and velocity distribution (e.g. [437]). Also, convection probes (spherical probes) and pressure probes (Prandtl s Pitot tube) were used. Later constant temperature hotwire/hot-film anemometry was used. Currently contactless laser doppler velocim-ctry (LDV)/anemometry (LDA) is exclusively utilized. 

Of course, in both these examples, after the first moment, complications would set in the deformable host might begin to support some of the load, and in either case the layer of water would soon cease being a layer of uniform thickness. But none of these later complications affects the simplicity of the relations between the pressure distribution and the resulting behavior of Q at the instant that the pressure distribution first exists. We must keep attention fixed on this first moment of geometrical simphcity while extending the preceding ideas to two more situations. 

The lateral pressure concept provides useful insight into the spatial distribution of forces and is a sum over terms corresponding to layers of finite thickness (dz). Quantitative measurements of the LP remain difficult and even the concept has been criticized. Chain order parameters, measured by H-NMR studies on amphiphiles with specifically deuterium-labelled methylene units in the tails, ° gave a similar view of the distribution of the chain attractions/repulsions as a function of position in the tails. Increasing quad-rupole splittings, indicated by an increasing distance between the two peaks in the H-NMR spectrum, are associated with increasing chain order. 

Another possible cause of lateral deflection of the screw is non-uniform pressure distribution around the circumference of the screw. Figure 8.8 shows a possible pressure distribution that will result in a considerable lateral force on the screw. 

---