Large Quantum Mechanical Models

Since the report for the initial four elements, AMI parameterizations for B, F, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Zn, Ge, Br, Sn, I, and Hg have been reported. Because AMI calculations are so fast (for a quantum mechanical model), and because the model is reasonably robust over a large range of chemical functionality, AMI is included in many molecular modeling packages, and results of AMI calculations continue to be reported in the chemical literature for a wide variety of applications. 

Note that the applicahon of representation theory to quantum mechanics depends heavily on the linear nature of quantum mechanics, that is. on the fact that we can successfully model states of quantum systems by vector spaces. (By contrast, note that the states of many classical systems cannot be modeled with a linear space consider for example a pendulum, whose motion is limited to a sphere on which one cannot dehne a natural addition.) The linearity of quantum mechanics is miraculous enough to beg the ques-hon is quantum mechanics truly linear There has been some inveshgation of nonlinear quantum mechanical models but by and large the success of linear models has been enormous and long-lived. 

As we have seen, the nucleons reside in well-defined orbitals in the nucleus that can be understood in a relatively simple quantum mechanical model, the shell model. In this model, the properties of the nucleus are dominated by the wave functions of the one or two unpaired nucleons. Notice that the bulk of the nucleons, which may even number in the hundreds, only contribute to the overall central potential. These core nucleons cannot be ignored in reality and they give rise to large-scale, macroscopic behavior of the nucleus that is very different from the behavior of single particles. There are two important collective motions of the nucleus that we have already mentioned that we should address collective or overall rotation of deformed nuclei and vibrations of the nuclear shape about a spherical ground-state shape. 

The VSEPR approach is largely restricted to Main Group species (as is Lewis theory). It can be applied to compounds of the transition elements where the nd subshell is either empty or filled, but a partly-filled nd subshell exerts an influence on stereochemistry which can often be interpreted satisfactorily by means of crystal field theory. Even in Main Group chemistry, VSEPR is by no means infallible. It remains, however, the simplest means of rationalising molecular shapes. In the absence of experimental data, it makes a reasonably reliable prediction of molecular geometry, an essential preliminary to a detailed description of bonding within a more elaborate, quantum-mechanical model such as valence bond or molecular orbital theory. 

The decision of which quantum mechanical model to use boils down to what size molecule you want to calculate, how reliable an answer you want, and how much time are you willing to wait for the results. Fortunately, as software and hardware improve, the tipping point of the balance weighing the pros and cons of semiempirical vs. DFT vs. ab initio is shifting such that larger molecules can be handled by the better methods. In special situations, a molecule with a couple of hundred atoms can be treated by an ab initio method (46,47), but the typical molecule of interest to theorists, spectrosco-pists, and physicists is smaller than what a pharmaceutical chemist usually wants to treat. Large molecular systems are often best left to one of the FF approaches (see next section). 

Before any computational study on molecular properties can be carried out, a molecular model needs to be established. It can be based on an appropriate crystal structure or derived using any technique that can produce a valid model for a given compound, whether or not it has been prepared. Molecular mechanics is one such technique and, primarily for reasons of computational simplicity and efficiency, it is one of the most widely used technique. Quantum-mechanical modeling is far more computationally intensive and until recently has been used only rarely for metal complexes. However, the development of effective-core potentials (ECP) and density-functional-theory methods (DFT) has made the use of quantum mechanics a practical alternative. This is particularly so when the electronic structures of a small number of compounds or isomers are required or when transition states or excited states, which are not usually available in molecular mechanics, are to be investigated. However, molecular mechanics is still orders of magnitude faster than ab-initio quantum mechanics and therefore, when large numbers of... 

The accounting of the quantum mechanical models for the mutual solvent-solute polarization in a self-consistent fashion is perhaps their greatest virtue. However, as already alluded to, the costs of ab initio formalisms may not be warranted—either because they cannot attain accuracies beyond the intrinsic limitations of the continuum solvation model or, alternatively, because they are simply not applicable to a prohibitively large system. In such instances, just as in the gas phase, semiempirical quantum mechanical models often provide an attractive alternative to the classical models discussed earlier. 

Since pNA and most of the chromophores of interest have large dipole moments an important feature of the continuum models is the introduction of the reaction field. The pNA molecule at the centre of the cavity in the continuum induces a polarization on the surface of the cavity, which produces the reaction field acting on the central molecule. This reaction field changes the dipole moment of the pNA molecule via the linear polarizability. A self consistent procedure is required in which the effects of the reaction field and also the effects of the applied macroscopic fields modified by the internal field factors are included in a self-consistent determination of the molecular response within a specified quantum mechanical model. 

The field of molecular nonlinear optics has been growing since the first prediction of the nonlinear optical process, and a strong boost was given to the field with the experimental observation of nonlinear optical effects made by Franken et al. in 1961 [29]. The development of the modern laser had provided scientists with a source of the high-intensity fields needed for nonlinear optical processes to become effective. However, one could not observe a synchronous development in the quantum mechanical modeling of these processes, and there are several reasons for this delay. The molecules of experimental interest are in most cases large, and, 1... 

It is one of the most basic assumptions of chemistry that a complex molecular electronic structure can be thought of as a series of environment-insensitive substructures with a large degree of autonomy. In particular for many molecules we think of the total structure as composed of pairs of electrons (inner shells, lone pairs, bond pairs) and this idea can be translated into a quantum-mechanical model in which each separate pair (or group) has its own wavefunction. If this is so, then most of the analysis which we have used for the total electronic structure can be taken over unchanged in a description of the separate pairs. 

With their understanding of the nature of the chemical bond and the quantum mechanical model of atoms and molecules, scientists now have an improved understanding of why and how metals, semimetals, and nonmetals differ from each other. The properties of nonmetals are largely determined by the number of valence electrons that nonmetallic... 

In Chapter 4, Professor Donald W. Brenner and his co-workers Olga A. Shenderova and Denis A. Areshkin explore density functional theory and quantum-based analytic interatomic forces as they pertain to simulations of materials. The study of interfaces, fracture, point defects, and the new area of nanotechnology can be aided by atomistic simulations. Atom-level simulations require the use of an appropriate force field model because quantum mechanical calculations, although useful, are too compute-intensive for handling large systems or long simulation times. For these cases, analytic potential energy functions can be used to provide detailed information. Use of reliable quantum mechanical models to derive the functions is explained in this chapter. 

---