Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lagrangian dynamics approach

An important advance in making explicit polarizable force fields computationally feasible for MD simulation was the development of the extended Lagrangian methods. This extended dynamics approach was first proposed by Sprik and Klein [91], in the sipirit of the work of Car and Parrinello for ab initio MD dynamics [168], A similar extended system was proposed by van Belle et al. for inducible point dipoles [90, 169], In this approach each dipole is treated as a dynamical variable in the MD simulation and given a mass, Mm, and velocity, p.. The dipoles thus have a kinetic energy, JT (A)2/2, and are propagated using the equations of motion just like the atomic coordinates [90, 91, 170, 171]. The equation of motion for the dipoles is... [Pg.236]

The Eulerian continuum approach, based on a continuum assumption of phases, provides a field description of the dynamics of each phase. The Lagrangian trajectory approach, from the study of motions of individual particles, is able to yield historical trajectories of the particles. The kinetic theory modeling for interparticle collisions, extended from the kinetic theory of gases, can be applied to dense suspension systems where the transport in the particle phase is dominated by interparticle collisions. The Ergun equation provides important flow relationships, which are useful not only for packed bed systems, but also for some situations in fluidized bed systems. [Pg.164]

Lagrangian dynamics provides two approaches for dealing with systems with general holonomic constraints ... [Pg.77]

The first approach of Lagrangian dynamics consists of transforming to a set of independent generalized coordinates and making use of Lagrange s equations of the first kind, which do not involve the forces of constraint. The equations of constraint are implicit in the transformation to independent gen-... [Pg.77]

The currently most important technique of the dynamic approach is based on the calculation of classical trajectories. In such an approximation, nuclei of a chemical system in question are treated as classical particles moving under forces defined by the PES. The trajectories represent the solutions to the Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) of Eq. (1.27). [Pg.45]

Compaction, consolidation, and subsidence. A formal approach to modeling compaction, consolidation, and subsidence requires the use of well-defined constitutive equations that describe both fluid and solid phases of matter. At the same time, these would be applied to a general Lagrangian dynamical formulation written to host the deforming meshes, whose exact time histories must be determined as part of the overall solution. These nonlinear deformations are often plastic in nature, and not elastic, as in linear analyses usually employed in structural mechanics. This finite deformation approach, usually adopted in more rigorous academic researches into compressible porous media, is well known in soil mechanics and civil engineering. However, it is computationally intensive and not practical for routine use. This is particularly true when order-of-magnitude effects and qualitative trends only are examined. [Pg.263]

Sommerfeld M (2001) Validation of a stochastic lagrangian modeUing approach for interparticle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Int J Multiph Flow 27 1829-1858 Soo SL (1967) Fluid dynamics of multiphase systems. BlaisdeU Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts... [Pg.534]

The first approach is based on introducing simple velocity or position rescaling into the standard Newtonian MD. The second approach has a dynamic origin and is based on a refonnulation of the Lagrangian equations of motion for the system (so-called extended Lagrangian formulation.) In this section, we discuss several of the most widely used constant-temperature or constant-pressure schemes. [Pg.58]

Another popular approach to the isothennal (canonical) MD method was shown by Nose [25]. This method for treating the dynamics of a system in contact with a thennal reservoir is to include a degree of freedom that represents that reservoir, so that one can perform deterministic MD at constant temperature by refonnulating the Lagrangian equations of motion for this extended system. We can describe the Nose approach as an illustration of an extended Lagrangian method. Energy is allowed to flow dynamically from the reservoir to the system and back the reservoir has a certain thermal inertia associated with it. However, it is now more common to use the Nose scheme in the implementation of Hoover [26]. [Pg.59]

We introduced the equations of motion above from the Newtonian point of view using Newton s famous equation F ma. It is useful to realize that this is not the only (or even the best) way to define equations of motion within classical dynamics. Another powerful approach to this task is to define a quantity called the Lagrangian, L, in terms of the kinetic and potential energies,... [Pg.196]

The explanation of classical MD given above was meant in part to emphasize that the dynamics of atoms can be described provided that the potential energy of the atoms, U U(ru. .., r3N), is known as a function of the atomic coordinates. It has probably already occurred to you that a natural use of DFT calculations might be to perform molecular dynamics by calculating U U(r, ..., r3N) with DFT. That is, the potential energy of the system of interest can be calculated on the fly using quantum mechanics. This is the basic concept of ab initio MD. The Lagrangian for this approach can be written as... [Pg.198]

Lagrangian, respectively. At first we note that the total energy is conserved in both the dynamics, with oscillations orders of magnitude smaller than the oscillations of the potential energy. The latter presents on the other hand a behavior that is quite different in the two cases. For the case in which the charges are equilibrated at each step, the oscillations are quite large, of the order of 3.5 x 10-3 au, and they last for the whole trajectory. On the other hand, for the extended Lagrangian approach, after an initial period... [Pg.78]

In order to overcome the limitations of currently available empirical force field param-eterizations, we performed Car-Parrinello (CP) Molecular Dynamic simulations [36]. In the framework of DFT, the Car-Parrinello method is well recognized as a powerful tool to investigate the dynamical behaviour of chemical systems. This method is based on an extended Lagrangian MD scheme, where the potential energy surface is evaluated at the DFT level and both the electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom are propagated as dynamical variables. Moreover, the implementation of such MD scheme with localized basis sets for expanding the electronic wavefunctions has provided the chance to perform effective and reliable simulations of liquid systems with more accurate hybrid density functionals and nonperiodic boundary conditions [37]. Here we present the results of the CPMD/QM/PCM approach for the three nitroxide derivatives sketched above details on computational parameters can be found in specific papers [13]. [Pg.160]

The dynamic treatment of the charges is quite similar to the extended Lagrangian approach for predicting the values of the polarizable point dipoles, as discussed in the previous section. One noteworthy difference between these approaches, however, is that the positions of the shell charges are ordinary physical degrees of freedom. Thus the Lagrangian does not have to be extended with fictitious masses and kinetic energies to encompass their dynamics. [Pg.105]

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2 ab initio molecular dynamics methods are described. Specifically, in Section 2.1 we discuss the extended Lagrangian atom-centered density matrix (ADMP) technique for simultaneous dynamics of electrons and nuclei in large clusters, and in Section 2.2 we discuss the quantum wavepacket ab initio molecular dynamics (QWAIMD) method. Simulations conducted and new insights obtained from using these approaches are discussed in Section 3 and the concluding remarks are given in Section 4. [Pg.334]

Fig. 11. Typical computational results obtained by Lapin and Liibbert (1994) with a mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian approach. Liquid phase velocity pattern (left) and the bubble positions (right) in a wafer column (diameter, 1.0 m height, 1.5 m) where the bubbles are generated uniformly over its entire bottom. (Reprinted from Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 49, Lapin, A. and Liibbert, A., Numerical simulations of the dynamics of two-phase gas-liquid flows in bubble columns, p. 3661, copyright 1994 with permission from Elsevier Science.)... Fig. 11. Typical computational results obtained by Lapin and Liibbert (1994) with a mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian approach. Liquid phase velocity pattern (left) and the bubble positions (right) in a wafer column (diameter, 1.0 m height, 1.5 m) where the bubbles are generated uniformly over its entire bottom. (Reprinted from Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 49, Lapin, A. and Liibbert, A., Numerical simulations of the dynamics of two-phase gas-liquid flows in bubble columns, p. 3661, copyright 1994 with permission from Elsevier Science.)...

See other pages where Lagrangian dynamics approach is mentioned: [Pg.335]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.501]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.306 , Pg.567 ]




SEARCH



Dynamic approach

Dynamical approaches

Lagrangian

Lagrangian approach

Lagrangian dynamics

Lagrangians

© 2024 chempedia.info