Laboratory tools

Systematic studies of membrane phenomena can be traced to the eighteenth century philosopher scientists. For example, Abbn Nolet coined the word osmosis to describe permeation of water through a diaphragm in 1748. Through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, membranes had no industrial or commercial uses but were used as laboratory tools to develop physical/chemical theories. 

Fauske, H. K., Clare, G. H. and Creed, M. J., Laboratory Tool for Characterizing Chemical Systems, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Runaway Reactions, CCPS, Cambridge, MA, March 1989. 

Sweden produced a disproportionate number of outstanding chemists in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Jons Jakob Berzelius (1779-1848) determined with amazing accuracy the atomic masses of virtually all the elements known in his time. In his spare time, he invented such modern laboratory tools as the beaker, the flask, the pipet, and the ringstand. 

The above-mentioned targets refer to general advantages of micro reactors [42, 80, 100, 114, 119]. Enhanced transfer and better controlled residence time improve conversion and selectivity. The tools have small internal volumes, allowing one to generate flexibly a multitude of samples in serial or parallel fashion. Synthesis can be combined with a multi-step procedure. The economy of micro-reactor processes has not really been analyzed so far however, it is clear that as laboratory tools they allow in a number of cases technical expenditure, personnel and costs to be reduced. 

Micro reactors can cope with situations as depicted above. They are excellent laboratory tools to gather such information. 

GL 1] [R 1] [R 3] [P le] The performance of a typical laboratory bubble column was tested and benchmarked against the micro reactors (Figure 5.17). Using acetonitrile as solvent, the conversion of the laboratory bubble column ranged from 6 to 34% at selectivities of 17-50% [3, 38]. This corresponds to yields of 2-8%. Hence the yields of the laboratory tool are lower than those of the micro reactors, mainly as a consequence of lower selectivities. 

GL 1] [R 1] [R 3] [P la-d] For micro-channel processing, an analysis of the content of fluorine actually consumed as a function of the fluorine-to-toluene ratio was made [38]. The curves for two micro reactors and one laboratory bubble column do not show the same trend a decrease of converted fluorine with increasing ratio results for the falling-film micro reactor, whereas the micro and laboratory bubble columns show increasing performance. The two micro reactors use about 50-75% of all fluorine offered, whereas the laboratory tool has an efficiency of only 15%. 

GL 16] ]R 12] ]P 15] Using a simple thin-film model for mass transfer, values for the overall mass transfer coefficient were determined for both micro-channel processing and laboratory trickle-bed reactors [11]. The value for micro-reactor processing (fCL = 5-15 s ) exceeds the performance of the laboratory tool Ki a = 0.01-0.08 s ) [11, 12], However, more energy has to be spent for that purpose (see the next section). 

The main characteristic features of HPTLC (use of fine particle layers for fast separations, sorbents with a wide range of sorption properties, high degree of automation for sample application, development and detection) are the exact opposite of conventional TLC. Expectations in terms of performance, ease of use and quantitative information from the two approaches to TLC are truly opposite [419], Modern TLC faces an uncertain future while conventional TLC is likely to survive as a general laboratory tool. 

Linder MW, Prough RA, Valdes R. Pharmacogenetics a laboratory tool for optimizing therapeutic efficiency. Clin Chem 1997 43[2] 254—266. 

It has also been recognized that micro-structured components, because of their low mass and thermal inertia, are able to offer short response times for unsteady state periodic operations. Micro-reactors have been used successfully for fluorination, oxidations and both heterogeneous [63-65] and homogeneous hydrogenations [66]. A review on gas-liquid micro-structured reactors has been published [67]. The very small material inventory when using micro devices offers another advantage, notably as a laboratory tool for screening applications, kinetics determination and process data acquisition, where the main concern is... 

Hyphenated analytical techniques such as LC-MS, which combines liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, are well-developed laboratory tools that are widely used in the pharmaceutical industry. Eor some compounds, mass spectrometry alone is insufficient for complete structural elucidation of unknown compounds nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) can help elucidate the structure of these compounds (see Chapter 20). Traditionally, NMR experiments are performed on more or less pure samples, in which the signals of a single component dominate. Therefore, the structural analysis of individual components of complex mixtures is normally time-consuming and less cost-effective. The... 

In the geosciences Raman spectroscopy has traditionally been a laboratory tool for structural analysis of minerals. Recent developments in instrumentation make possible the use of Raman spectroscopy as a tool for routine identification of minerals in field situations. The following advantages characterize Raman analysis of minerals no sample preparation in situ real time measurement non-destructive and non-intrusive sampling samples may be transparent or opaque spectra are well resolved and with high information content. 

Technological compounds and laboratory tools The technological use of natural products is as old as humanity, although mixtures of unknown conqjosition were mostly used before the advent of chemistry. Mummification in ancient Egypt is one such exan le. In contrast, that of the Phoenician Tyrian Purple was an advanced technology based on a practically pure substance. 

Chapter 13. Exploiting natural product diversity Table 13.5.II. Natural and semisynthetic laboratory tools ... 

---