Kohn approach

Within the Hohenberg-Kohn approach [17, 18], the possibility of transforming density functional theory into a theory fully equivalent to the Schrodinger equation hinges on whether the elusive universal energy functional can ever be found. Unfortunately, the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem, being just an existence theorem, does not provide any indication of how one should proceed in order to find this functional. Moreover, the contention that such a functional should exist - and that it should be the same for systems that have neither the same number of particles nor the same symmetries (for an atom, for example, those symmetries are defined by U, L, S, and the parity operator ft) -certainly opens the door to dubious speculation. 

An important extension of the original Hohenberg-Kohn approach has been proposed by Levy [14, 15] based on earlier work by Percus [16]. The functional F[p] of Hohenberg and Kohn is defined only for densities which are obtained from a nondegenerate ground-state wavefunction corresponding to an external local potential. Levy introduced a functional... 

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. 

To. solve the Kohn-Sham equations a self-consistent approach is taken. An initial guess of the density is fed into Equation (3.47) from which a set of orbitals can be derived, leading to an improved value for the density, which is then used in the second iteration, and so on until convergence is achieved. 

To solve the Kohn-Sham equations a number of different approaches and strategies have been proposed. One important way in which these can differ is in the choice of basis set for expanding the Kohn-Sham orbitals. In most (but not all) DPT programs for calculating the properties of molecular systems (rather than for solid-state materials) the Kohn-Sham orbitals are expressed as a linear combination of atomic-centred basis functions ... 

The application of density functional theory to isolated, organic molecules is still in relative infancy compared with the use of Hartree-Fock methods. There continues to be a steady stream of publications designed to assess the performance of the various approaches to DFT. As we have discussed there is a plethora of ways in which density functional theory can be implemented with different functional forms for the basis set (Gaussians, Slater type orbitals, or numerical), different expressions for the exchange and correlation contributions within the local density approximation, different expressions for the gradient corrections and different ways to solve the Kohn-Sham equations to achieve self-consistency. This contrasts with the situation for Hartree-Fock calculations, wlrich mostly use one of a series of tried and tested Gaussian basis sets and where there is a substantial body of literature to help choose the most appropriate method for incorporating post-Hartree-Fock methods, should that be desired. 

The LSDA approach requires simultaneous self-consistent solutions of the Schrbdinger and Poisson equations. This was accomplished using the Layer Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker technique which has many useful features for calculations of properties of layered systems. It is, for example, one of only a few electronic structure techniques that can treat non-periodic infinite systems. It also has the virtue that the computational time required for a calculation scales linearly with the number of different layers, not as the third power as most other techniques. 

Kohn, J., and Langer, R., A new approach to the development of bioerodible polymers for controlled release applications employing naturally occurring amino acids, in Proceeding of the ACS Division of Polymeric Materials. Science and Engineering. American Chemical Society, 1984, Vol. 51, pp. 119-121. 

Zhang, S., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Kohn, H., Tropsha, A. A novel automated lazy learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) approach method development, applications, and virmal screening of chemical databases using validated ALL-QSAR models. 

Scherrer, R. A. The treatment of ionizable compounds in quantitative structure-activity smdies with special consideration to ion partitioning. In Pesticide Synthesis Throi h Rational Approaches (ACS Symp. Ser. 255), Magee, P. S., Kohn, G. K., Menn, J. J. (eds.), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1984, pp. 225-246. 

It is a truism that in the past decade density functional theory has made its way from a peripheral position in quantum chemistry to center stage. Of course the often excellent accuracy of the DFT based methods has provided the primary driving force of this development. When one adds to this the computational economy of the calculations, the choice for DFT appears natural and practical. So DFT has conquered the rational minds of the quantum chemists and computational chemists, but has it also won their hearts To many, the success of DFT appeared somewhat miraculous, and maybe even unjust and unjustified. Unjust in view of the easy achievement of accuracy that was so hard to come by in the wave function based methods. And unjustified it appeared to those who doubted the soundness of the theoretical foundations. There has been misunderstanding concerning the status of the one-determinantal approach of Kohn and Sham, which superficially appeared to preclude the incorporation of correlation effects. There has been uneasiness about the molecular orbitals of the Kohn-Sham model, which chemists used qualitatively as they always have used orbitals but which in the physics literature were sometimes denoted as mathematical constructs devoid of physical (let alone chemical) meaning. 

Since the Fock operator is a effective one-electron operator, equation (1-29) describes a system of N electrons which do not interact among themselves but experience an effective potential VHF. In other words, the Slater determinant is the exact wave function of N noninteracting particles moving in the field of the effective potential VHF.5 It will not take long before we will meet again the idea of non-interacting systems in the discussion of the Kohn-Sham approach to density functional theory. 

Before we enter a more detailed discussion of various aspects in the Kohn-Sham approach, let us summarize the main features of this procedure ... 

In the preceding paragraph we have given a detailed survey of the Kohn-Sham approach to density functional theory. Now, we need to discuss some of the relevant properties pertaining to this scheme and how we have to interpret the various quantities it produces. We also will mention some areas connected to Kohn-Sham density functional theory which are still problematic. Before we enter this discussion the reader should be reminded to differentiate carefully between results that apply to the hypothetical situation in which the exact functional ExC and the corresponding potential Vxc are known and the real world in which we have to use approximations to these quantities. 

Is the Kohn-Sham Approach a Single Determinant Method ... 

---