Iron complexes hydroxamates

A multiple-path mechanism has been elaborated for dissociation of the mono- and binuclear tris(hydroxamato)-iron(III) complexes with dihydroxamate ligands in aqueous solution. " Iron removal by edta from mono-, bi-, and trinuclear complexes with model desferrioxamine-related siderophores containing one, two, or three tris-hydroxamate units generally follows first-order kinetics though biphasic kinetics were reported for iron removal from one of the binuclear complexes. The kinetic results were interpreted in terms of discrete intrastrand ferrioxamine-type structures for the di-iron and tri-iron complexes of (288). " Reactivities for dissociation, by dissociative activation mechanisms, of a selection of bidentate and hexadentate hydroxamates have been compared with those of oxinates and salicylates. ... 

Once the siderophore-iron complexes are inside the bacteria, the iron is released and utilized for vital cell functions. The iron-free hydroxamate siderophores are commonly re-excreted to bring in an additional iron load (Enterobactin is at least partially degraded by a cytoplasmic esterase This cycle is repeated until specific intracellular ferric uptake regulation proteins (Fur proteins) bind iron, and signal that the intracellular iron level is satisfactory, at -which point ne-w siderophore and siderophore-receptor biosynthesis are halted and the iron-uptake process stops. This intricate feedback mechanism allows a meticulous control over iron(III) uptake and accumulation against an unfavorable concentration gradient so as to maintain the intracellular iron(III) level within the required narrow window. Several excellent reviews concerning siderophore-iron transport mechanisms have been recently published i.3,i6, is,40,45,60-62 ... 

The EFF calculations yielded a single Cs-symmetric conformation for each type of ferrichrome analog (Figure 4), both with a A-cis configuration of the hydroxamates about the metal when L-amino acids were used. Taken together with the spectroscopic data, pronounced differences were observed for the conformations of these iron complexes. Inspection of the calculated conformations showed that the backbone amide groups may... 

Mikes, 0. and /. Turkova Hydroxamates and their iron complexes, a new type of natural product. Chem. Listy 58, 65 (1964). 

Fiala (45) and Fiala and Burk (46) early postulated, by analogy from the visible absorption spectra of iron transferrin and the iron complex of aspergillic acid, that iron was bound in transferrins through a hydroxamic acid-CC>2 complex. This formulation is shown in Fig. 15. Fraenkel-Conrat (48), however, could find no evidence for hydroxylamido groups in chicken ovotransferrin. He also prepared and studied the properties of several hydroxylamido proteins by the chemical introduction of the hydroxylamido groups, and found that their properties were quite different from those of the transferrins. 

The markedly negative redox potentials of tris-catecholate and tris-hydroxamate iron complexes (Figure 4) may be ascribed to the high stabilities of the iron(III) complexes and the rather low stabilities of their iron(II) analogues. Table 9 details the relevant data (interconnected by a thermochemical cycle earlier applied to amino acid pentacyanoferrate complexes ), and documents the remarkably higher stabilities of tris-catecholate than of tris-hydroxamate complexes of iron(III). 

FhuD delivers the ferric-siderophore complex to the FhuBC complex in the cytoplasmic membrane. FhuB is an intrinsic cytoplasmic membrane protein through which the iron complex can pass, driven by energy supplied by ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by the ATPase FhuC. Ferrous iron may be released from the hydroxamate via reduction by the reductase FhuF, which is loosely associated with the cytoplasmic membrane and, like FhuD, appears to have a lower specificity than FhuA and is active with coprogen and ferrichrome. ... 

Hydroxamate- or catecholate-containing siderophores are strongly absorbing species with characteristic spectra (see Table 1) which can be utilized for spectrophotometric determination of the complex formation constant. Iron(III) hydroxamates absorb in the visible region, producing a broad absorption band in the 420-440 nm region. Iron(III) catecholates exhibit pH-dependent absorption maxima. Unfortunately, the overall Fe + ion complex formation constants cannot be determined directly at neutral pH, because the extremely high stability of siderophore complexes precludes direct measurements of the equilibrium of interest, which would yield the desired formation constant for a tris-bidentate siderophore complex, /3no (equation (2)). ... 

Figure 6.18. MacrcKyclic complex fonners. (a) Structure of a ferrichrome (desferri-ferrichrome), one of the strongest complex formers presently known for Fe(III). The iron-binding center is an octahedral arrangement of six oxygen donor atoms of trihy-droxamate. Such naturally occurring ferrichromes play an important role in the biosynthetic pathways involving iron. Complexing functionalities of some biogenic ligands (b) hydroxamate siderophores, (c) catechol siderophores, and (d) phytochelatines. For detailed structures see Neilands (1981).

Formation Constants of Iron Complexes of Hydroxamic Acid Polymers (12)... 

Wirgau JI, Crumbhss AL. Carrier-facilitated bulk hquid membrane transport of iron (III) hydroxamate complexes utilizing a labile recognition agent and amine recognition in the second coordination sphere. Dalton Trans 2003 19 3680-3685. 

There are many other iron complexes of a similar nature yet to be investigated including many model complexes such as cupferron and ferric acetyl acetonate as well as the hydroxamates and the catechols. 

To our surprise, we found that the iron(III) hydroxamate and thiohydroxamate complexes can also be resolved by the method... 

N, 6-N-di(2,3-dihydroxybenzoyl)-L-lysine (58) is a siderophore produced by Azotobacter vinelandii which has only two catechol groups. However, of the catecholate siderophores by far the best studied is enterobactin. A major difference between hydroxamate and catecholate siderophores occurs in their utilization as transport agents. For the former, the iron complex is taken up by the bacterial cell, the iron released, and the hydroxamate siderophore re-secreted for additional iron chelation. In contrast, enterobactin is destroyed by enzymatic hydrolysis within the cell and therefore the ligand is not recycled. This hydrolysis of the amide linkages of the iron(III) enterobactin lowers the redox potential of the chelate complex sufficiently to allow iron reduction — and thus uptake of iron into the cell metabolism (59, 60). 

---