Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ionic strength, surface area

Rate coefficient includes all factors that affect reaction rate, except for concentration, which is explicitly accounted for. Rate coefficient is therefore not constant because of that reason the name reaction rate coefficient is preferred over reaction rate constant. The rate coefficient is mainly affected by temperature as described by Arrhenius equation but also, ionic strength, surface area of the adsorbent (for heterogeneous reactions), light irradiation, and other physicochemical properties, depending on the considered reaction. [Pg.638]

In chemical kinetics a reaction rate constant k (also called rate coefficient) quantifies the speed of a chemical reaction. The value of this coefficient k depends on conditions such as temperature, ionic strength, surface area of the adsorbent or light irradiation. For elementary reactions, the rate equation can be derived from first principles, using for example collision theory. The rate equation of a reaction with a multi-step mechanism cannot, in general, be deduced from the stoichiometric coefficients of the overall reaction it must be determined experimentally. The equation may involve fractional exponential coefficients, or may depend on the concentration of an intermediate species. [Pg.30]

In addition to the pore size-particle size retention relationship problems mentioned above, other factors can influence a filter medium s retention characteristics. Absorptive retention can be influenced by the organism size, organism population, pore size of the medium, pH of the filtrate, ionic strength, surface tension, and organic content. Operational parameters can also influence retention, such as flow rate, salt concentration, viscosity, temperature, filtration duration, filtration pressure, membrane thickness, organism type, and filter medium area [52,53]. [Pg.163]

The presence of the large repulsive potential barrier between the secondary minimum and contact prevents flocculation. One can thus see why increasing ionic strength of a solution promotes flocculation. The net potential per unit area between two planar surfaces is given approximately by the combination of Eqs. V-31 and VI-22 ... [Pg.241]

PHEMA solubility decreases with increasing ion concentration. As a result, Mikos et al. used salt solutions of varying ionic strength to dilute the reaction mixtures (Liu et al., 2000). It was noted that increasing the ion content of the aqueous solution to 0.7M, interconnected macropores were obtained at 60 vol% water. Surfactants may also be used to control the network pore structure. However, not much work has been done in this area, since surfactants typically work to reduce the surface repulsions between the two phases and form a uniform emulsion. These smaller emulsion droplets when gelled will create a network with an even smaller porous structure. Yet, this is still a promising area of exploration, since it may be possible to form alternate phase structures such as bicontinuous phases, which would be ideal for cellular invasion. [Pg.101]

Fig. 4. Influence of pH on the plateau-value /T of adsorption isotherms of polyampholytes. At either side of the isoelectric point, i.e.p., the polyampholyte attains a net charge causing intra- and intermolecular electrostatic repulsion. As a result, the mass of adsorbed polyampholyte, that can be accommodated per unit area of the sorbent surface, decreases. Electrostatic interactions are suppressed by increasing ionic strength, yielding /T less sensitive to pH. Fig. 4. Influence of pH on the plateau-value /T of adsorption isotherms of polyampholytes. At either side of the isoelectric point, i.e.p., the polyampholyte attains a net charge causing intra- and intermolecular electrostatic repulsion. As a result, the mass of adsorbed polyampholyte, that can be accommodated per unit area of the sorbent surface, decreases. Electrostatic interactions are suppressed by increasing ionic strength, yielding /T less sensitive to pH.
The additional potential required to maintain a current flowing in a cell when the concentration of the electroactive species at the electrode surface is less than that in the bulk solution. In extreme cases, the cell current reaches a limiting value determined by the rate of transport of the electroactive species to the electrode surface from the bulk solution. The current is then independent of cell potential and the electrode or cell is said to be completely polarized. Concentration overpotential decreases with stirring and with increasing electrode area, temperature and ionic strength. [Pg.230]

The general requirements for an SOFC anode material include [1-3] good chemical and thermal stability during fuel cell fabrication and operation, high electronic conductivity under fuel cell operating conditions, excellent catalytic activity toward the oxidation of fuels, manageable mismatch in coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) with adjacent cell components, sufficient mechanical strength and flexibility, ease of fabrication into desired microstructures (e.g., sufficient porosity and surface area), and low cost. Further, ionic conductivity would be beneficial to the extension of... [Pg.74]

We resume the problem discussed in Example 2.2 and solve the same problem, but now we correct for electrostatic effects. Sumarizing the problem Calculate the pH dependence of the binding of a) a metal ion Me2+, and b) of a ligand A to a hydrous oxide, SOH, and compare the effect of a charged surface at an ionic strength I = 0.1. A specific surface area of 10 g m 2 10 4 mol surface sites per gram ( 6 sites nnrr2) concentration used 1 g e-1 (10 4 mol surface sites per liter solution). As before (Example 2.2) the surface complex formation constants are log Kj = -1 and log K = 5, respectively. [Pg.71]

Specific surface area 40 m2 g 1, acidity constants of FeOHg pK., (int) = 7.25, K 2 = 9.75, site density = 4.8 nrrr2, hematite cone = 10 mgle. Ionic strength 0.005. For the calculation the diffuse double layer model shall be used. [Pg.255]

FIGURE 15.10 Plots of the Gibbs free energy per unit area, AG/A, as a function of the distance between two oppositely charged planar surfaces, L, with the ionic strength as a parameter. The curves are calculated from Equation 15.63 with e=80, c =-0.16C/m, and Op = 0.03C/m. ... [Pg.441]

Surface Adsorption and molecular Areas of 111 RDH (1)-Surfactant (2) Solutions (with NaCl, Ionic Strength D.l mj at 30 C)... [Pg.174]

Salts. Salts trap water and unveil the hydrophobic areas on the surface of enzyme molecules resulting in aggregation their precipitation. Salting out depends on hydrophobic interaction, alteration of pH or ionic strength, polarity and temperature. The most commonly used reagents are ammonium and sodium sulphate. [Pg.231]


See other pages where Ionic strength, surface area is mentioned: [Pg.336]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.1653]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.1699]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.327]   


SEARCH



Ionic strength

Ionic strength, surface area function

Ionic surfaces

Strength surface area

Surfaces strength

© 2024 chempedia.info