Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ionic strength factor

The thermodynamics of an outer-sphere electron-transfer reaction is represented by the Weller equation that provides the free enthalpy AG° as a function of the standard redox potentials of the donor and the acceptor and an electrostatic factor containing the sum d of the radiuses of the donor and acceptor, their charges Zd and Za, the dielectric constant e of the medium and the ionic strength factor f (often approximated to one). [Pg.82]

Neither of these options are optimal. Fortunately, recent measirrements of electrokinetic properties with an acoustophoretic method show that at high electrolyte concentrations, the data do not allow the assumption of symmetrical electrolyte binding. Option (2) would be highly preferable. This permits a sorbent-specific capacitance value and simple mixing of electrolytes which will be encountered in real systems. The recent resrrlts, if interpreted in a mere mass law sense, appear somewhat surprising, because the solid concentration is increased much more drastically (by about three orders of magnitude) than the ionic strength (factor of 100) compared to conventional microelectrophoresis, where no shifts occur. [Pg.675]

For example, van den Tempel [35] reports the results shown in Fig. XIV-9 on the effect of electrolyte concentration on flocculation rates of an O/W emulsion. Note that d ln)ldt (equal to k in the simple theory) increases rapidly with ionic strength, presumably due to the decrease in double-layer half-thickness and perhaps also due to some Stem layer adsorption of positive ions. The preexponential factor in Eq. XIV-7, ko = (8kr/3 ), should have the value of about 10 " cm, but at low electrolyte concentration, the values in the figure are smaller by tenfold or a hundredfold. This reduction may be qualitatively ascribed to charged repulsion. [Pg.512]

The factors to consider in the selection of cross-flow filtration include the cross-flow velocity, the driving pressure, the separation characteristics of the membrane (permeability and pore size), size of particulates relative to the membrane pore dimensions, and the hydrodynamic conditions within the flow module. Again, since particle-particle and particle-membrane interactions are key, broth conditioning (ionic strength, pH, etc.) may be necessary to optimize performance. [Pg.2058]

The protonation equilibria for nine hydroxamic acids in solutions have been studied pH-potentiometrically via a modified Irving and Rossotti technique. The dissociation constants (p/fa values) of hydroxamic acids and the thermodynamic functions (AG°, AH°, AS°, and 5) for the successive and overall protonation processes of hydroxamic acids have been derived at different temperatures in water and in three different mixtures of water and dioxane (the mole fractions of dioxane were 0.083, 0.174, and 0.33). Titrations were also carried out in water ionic strengths of (0.15, 0.20, and 0.25) mol dm NaNOg, and the resulting dissociation constants are reported. A detailed thermodynamic analysis of the effects of organic solvent (dioxane), temperature, and ionic strength on the protonation processes of hydroxamic acids is presented and discussed to determine the factors which control these processes. [Pg.40]

Use of the K p for precipitation information is often complicated by a number of interfering factors including complexation of metallic ions, high ionic strength solutions, and high solids contents. This principle is applicable solely to ionic compounds, i.e., primarily inorganic compounds. [Pg.163]

The importance of adding some ionic strength to the DMF, typically with LiBr, has been reported in the literature (9). This can be important for ionizable monomers, but can also be a factor even if only the end group is ionic. The... [Pg.553]

In many situations, the actual molar amount of the enzyme is not known. However, its amount can be expressed in terms of the activity observed. The International Commission on Enzymes defines One International Unit of enzyme as the amount that catalyzes the formation of one micromole of product in one minute. (Because enzymes are very sensitive to factors such as pH, temperature, and ionic strength, the conditions of assay must be specified.) Another definition for units of enzyme activity is the katal. One katal is that amount of enzyme catalyzing the conversion of one mole of substrate to product in one second. Thus, one katal equals 6X10 international units. [Pg.438]

The salt attack is also an important factor determining the SAH efficiency in the soil medium. In terms of Eq. (4.3), it is manifested by a sharp decrease of the coefficients y and B. The hydrogel structure prediction for specific application conditions requires to take into account universal (ionic strength) and specific (collapse) suppression phenomena and, therefore, a rather delicate balancing in search for a compromise between swelling gains due to the network density (n ) and the ionicity ((3). [Pg.128]

One factor that complicates the kinetic picture is the salt effect. An increase in ionic strength of the solution usually increases the rate of an SnI reaction (p. 451). But when the reaction is of charge type II, where both Y and RX are neutral, so that X is negatively charged (and most solvolyses are of this charge type), the ionic strength increases as the reaction proceeds and this increases the rate. This effect must be taken into account in studying the kinetics. Incidentally, the fact that the addition of outside ions increases the rate of most SnI reactions makes especially impressive the decrease in rate caused by the common ion. [Pg.395]

Any factor that affects the size or shape of a molecule, the hindered movement of a fluorophore within a molecule, or the energy transfer within the molecule will affect the measured depolarization of its fluorescence emission. Therefore, the conformation of humic fractions in solution can be studied as a function of pH, ionic strength, temperature, and other factors by depolarization measurements. The principle of the method is that excitation of fluorescent samples with polarized light stimulates... [Pg.181]

The variable factor in reaction series usually was a substituent change, although solvent variation also has been given special attention (39-44). Variations of catalyst (4, 5, 23-25, 45-49), ionic strength (50), or pressure (51, 52) also have been studied. In exceptional cases, temperature can become the variable parameter if the kinetics has been followed over a broad temperature range and the activation parameters are treated as variable (53), or temperature as well as structural parameters can be changed (6). Most of the work done concerns kinetics, but isoequilibrium relationships also have been observed (2, 54-58), particularly with ionization equilibria (59-82). [Pg.417]

The effects of ion valence and polyelectrolyte charge density showed that at very low ionic strength found that when the counterion valence of added salt changes from monovalent (NaCl) to divalent (MgS04), the reduced viscosity decreases by a factor of about 4.5. If La(N03)3 is used, the reduced viscosity will be further decreased although not drastically. As for polyelectrolyte charge density, the intrinsic viscosity was found to increase with it because of an enhanced intrachain electrostatic repulsion (Antonietti et al. 1997). [Pg.106]

Despite its weakness, the anisotropy of the g tensor of iron-sulfur centers can be used to determine the orientation of these centers or that of the accommodating polypeptide in relation to a more complex system such as a membrane-bound complex. For this purpose, the EPR study has to be carried out on either partially or fully oriented systems (oriented membranes or monocrystals, respectively). Lastly, the sensitivity of the EPR spectra of iron-sulfur centers to structural changes can be utilized to monitor the conformational changes induced in the protein by different factors, such as the pH and the ionic strength of the solvent or the binding of substrates and inhibitors. We return to the latter point in Section IV. [Pg.450]

There is an extensive amount of data in the literature on the effect of many factors (e.g. temperature, monomer and surfactant concentration and types, ionic strength, reactor configuration) on the time evolution of quantities such as conversions, particle number and size, molecular weight, composition. In this section, EPM predictions are compared with the following limited but useful cross section of isothermal experimental data ... [Pg.367]

The actual characteristics of REV produced depend on a number of factors such as choice of lipids (% cholesterol and charged lipids), lipid concentration used in the organic solvent, rate of evaporation, and ionic strength of the aqueous phase (Szoka and Papahadjopoulos, 1980). Modifications of this REV technique were proposed by several groups. The SPLV (stable plurilamellar vesicles) method consists of bath-sonicating an emulsion of the aqueous phase in an ether solution of lipid while evaporating the ether (Griiner et al., 1985). [Pg.265]

However, in subsequent studies [23-25,88-90] it was demonstrated that in reality the particle deposition is not a purely geometric effect, and the maximum surface coverage depends on several parameters, such as transport of particles to the surface, external forces, particle-surface and particle-particle interactions such as repulsive electrostatic forces [25], polydispersity of the particles [89], and ionic strength of the colloidal solution [23,88,90]. Using different kinds of particles and substrates, values of the maximum surface coverage varied by as much as a factor of 10 between the different studies. [Pg.229]

Because a chemical step is imposed on top of the physical distribution process of partition, there is a great potential for selectivity, as noted by Schill et al, (49>50), Such factors as pH, type and composition of the organic phase, and ionic strength of the aqueous phase can be used to control relative retention. The concentration and type of counterion mainly control the absolute retention. [Pg.242]


See other pages where Ionic strength factor is mentioned: [Pg.533]    [Pg.3141]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.3141]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.2061]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.101]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.82 ]




SEARCH



Ionic strength

Ionicity factor

Strength factors

© 2024 chempedia.info