Interferent multivariate analysis

The baseline of the atomic peak can steadily increase its absorbance because of instrumental malfunction, drift, a sample constituent giving rise to proportional interferences or an atomisation problem. The general appearance is that the atomic peaks are stacked , but this arrangement is not related to the concentration of the analyte. Baseline correction is a general practice in atomic spectrometry to measure accurately the height or the total area under the peak. In multivariate analysis, the procedure is the same in order to start all atomic peaks in the same absorbance position, in general at zero scale. The most basic baseline correction is offset correction, in which a constant value is subtracted to all absorbances that define the atomic peak (Figure 4.10a). 

Because NIR was initially used for food and agriculture products, it has evolved as a technique for complex matrices. Many types of hardware have become available for NIR work interference filters, gratings, interferometers, diode arrays, and acousto-optic tunable filters. And, as it was originally developed for complex mixtures, chemometrics has been an integral part of any NIR analysis for the last few decades. NIR practitioners are quite comfortable with multivariate equations and development of equations for complex matrices. 

The multivariate quantitative spectroscopic analysis of samples with complex matrices can be performed using inverse calibration methods, such as ILS, PCR and PLS. The term "inverse" means that the concentration of the analyte of interest is modelled as a function of the instrumental measurements, using an empirical relationship with no theoretical foundation (as the Lambert Bouguer-Beer s law was for the methods explained in the paragraphs above). Therefore, we can formulate our calibration like eqn (3.3) and, in contrast to the CLS model, it can be calculated without knowing the concentrations of all the constituents in the calibration set. The calibration step requires only the instrumental response and the reference value of the property of interest e.g. concentration) in the calibration samples. An important advantage of this approach is that unknown interferents may be present in the calibration samples. For this reason, inverse models are more suited than CLS for complex samples. 

However, none of the trials post-hoc analysis, which suggested that there is an interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors, was specifically designed to examine this question. Post-hoc and subgroup analyses may be heavily biased, and multivariate adjustment may not have been able to account fully for confounding factors. Aspirin in itself may be harmful in certain patients, such as those with heart failure, because of its antiprostaglandin activity, rather than because it interferes with the actions of ACE inhibitors, a phenomenon that would also manifest as an aspirin-ACE inhibitor interaction. 

Of course, the reason for the improvement in the calibration model when the second term is included is that A21 serves to compensate for the absorbance due to the tyrosine since X21 is in the spectral region of a tyrosine absorption band with little interference from tryptophan. Figure 6. In general, the selection of variables for multivariate regression analysis may not be so obvious. 

Multivariate curve resolution can be used for the analysis of augmented sets as a way of reinforcing conclusions on peak purity, improving the resolution of overlapping compounds, and performing multicomponent determinations in the presence of interferences. 

Multivariate analytical methods have also been applied to the analysis of drug substances. The methods have a significant component of matrix analysis, and the Beer-Lambert law is basically rewritten in matrix form, permitting matrix analysis of absorbance data. A number of other mathematical algorithms have also been developed for the quantitation of analytes in multicomponent mixtures. These have either been iterative methods or methods based on multiple least-squares regression. The multiple least-squares regression methods require a knowledge of all the components of the multicomponent mixture, whereas the iterative methods such as the Kalman or the simplex method are less restrictive in the sense that interferents whose spectra are not known need not be included in the database. 

The power of a first order instrument is that it can deal with interferents, as long as such interferents are in the calibration set. That is, the first order instrument can be calibrated for the analyte in the presence of interferents and the concentrations of such interferents do not even have to be known. If the analyte is present in a future sample and an interferent which was not seen in the calibration set (i.e., it is a new interferent) the concentration estimate of the analyte is wrong, but the calibration model diagnoses this by indicating the sample as an outlier. These properties of first order instruments are very powerful and explain their use in, e.g., process analysis and multivariate calibration where sample pretreatment would take too much time. 

In this work, two methods for the determination of caffeine in energy drinks by derivative spectrophotometry and by partial least-squares multivariate spectropho-tometric calibration (PLS-1) are described. Proposed methods involve background correction methods that interferences from vitamins, taurin and food colours were minimized by treating the sample with basic lead acetate and NaHCOj for the analysis of caffeine in energy drinks. 

Because many elements have several strong emission Hnes, AES can be regarded as a multivariate technique per se. Traditionally, for quantitative analysis in atomic emission spectroscopy, a single strong spectral line is chosen, based upon the criteria of Hne sensitivity and freedom of spectral interferences. Many univariate attempts have been made to compensate spectral interferences by standard addition, matrix matching, or interelement correction factors. However, all univariate methods suffer from serious limitations in a complex and Hne-rich matrix. 

In atomic emission spectroscopy flames, sparks, and MIPs will have their niche for dedicated apphcations, however the ICP stays the most versatile plasma for multi-element determination. The advances in instrumentation and the analytical methodology make quantitative analysis with ICP-AES rather straightforward once the matrix is understood and background correction and spectral overlap correction protocols are implemented. Modern spectrometer software automatically provides aids to overcome spectral and chemical interference as well as multivariate calibration methods. In this way, ICP-AES has matured in robustness and automation to the point where high throughput analysis can be performed on a routine basis. 

Li-Chan (1994) reviews current developments in the detection of adulteration of olive oil, pointing out that multivariate spectroscopic methods of analysis derive their power from the simultaneous use of multiple variables in the spectrum. The effect of interference in some variables can then be reduced by the calibration method used (PCR, PLS, etc.). This type of approach has previously been used for crude petrochemical oil, as described by Kvalheim et al. (1985) and Brekke et al. (1990), with very promising results. 

---