Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interference diffusion measurement

In a recent experimental study of the adsorption of methanol in a large crystal of CrAPO by interference microscopy, Lehmann et al. [36] observed that, even at equilibrium, the distribution of sorbate through the crystal is far from uniform. It seems clear that access is controlled lai ely by the defect structure and the growth planes of the crystal. This observation may provide a plausible explanation for the discrepancies observed between different diffusion measurements. The impact of the defect structure... [Pg.21]

As schematically shown by Fig. 46a, ferrierite contains two mutually intersecting arrays of channels. In comparison with the strictly one-dimensional MOF crystals considered in the previous section, their analysis is additionally complicated by the existence of two rooflike parts on either side of the platelike main crystal body. It turned out, however, that these features did in no way complicate the method of analysis. Contrary to the MOFs, which required an additional activation step after each uptake experiment, methanol in ferrierite proved to be an ideal host-guest system, where one and the same crystal could alternately be subjected to adsorption and desorption without any perceptible change in the sorbate profiles. It were these special conditions under which interference microscopy could be developed to a technique of diffusion measurement in nanoporous materials of unprecedented power [63,65,70,71,88,89]. [Pg.186]

Besides measurements, there are potential benefits in the observation of other nuclides for diffusion measurements. There may be fewer problems with resonance overlap of different species or less interference from solvent or impurity resonances, for example, or the compound of interest may simply lack hydrogen as is often the case with counter-ions. In this case, one should be aware that optimum parameters for measurement may not be suitable for nuclides of lower magnetogyric ratio, 7. This is because the total effective gradient strengths employed also depend on this parameter and, as can be seen from the Stejskel-Tanner equation (Eq. (9.6)), the degree of attenuation of resonance intensity will be reduced as 7 becomes smaller. This is illustrated in Fig. 9.23 where the decay profiles for four different nuclides are shown, having been calculated with identical diffusion parameters but with the appropriate 7... [Pg.319]

Fig. 5.6-4. Interferometers for accurate diffusion measurements. These three instruments can be expensive to build and hard to operate, but they give very accurate results. Each produces interference fringes like those shown at the right of each schematic. LS, light source L, collimating lens C, diffusion cell LC, cylindrical lens M, mirror M, M", half-silvered mirrors. Fig. 5.6-4. Interferometers for accurate diffusion measurements. These three instruments can be expensive to build and hard to operate, but they give very accurate results. Each produces interference fringes like those shown at the right of each schematic. LS, light source L, collimating lens C, diffusion cell LC, cylindrical lens M, mirror M, M", half-silvered mirrors.
In selecting reference electrodes for practical use, one should apply two criteria that of reducing the diffusion potentials and that of a lack of interference of RE components with the system being studied. Thus, mercury-containing REs (calomel or mercury-mercuric oxide) are inappropriate for measurements in conjunction with platinum electrodes, since the mercury ions readily poison platinum surfaces. Calomel REs are also inappropriate for systems sensitive to chloride ions. [Pg.195]

Apart from the necessity of excluding interferences from any diffusion potential, normal potentiometry requires accurate determination of the emf, i.e., without any perceptible drawing off of current from the cell therefore, usually one uses the so-called Poggendorff method for exact compensation measurement the later application of high-resistance glass and other membrane electrodes has led to the modern commercial high-impedance pH and PI meters with high amplification in order to detect the emf null point in the balanced system. [Pg.45]

Optical techniques, in particular interferometry, may be used to measure a nonzero concentration of the reactant at the electrode. However, such measurements are restricted to (a) dilute solutions, because refraction occurs in addition to interference (B4a), and (b) solutions in which only the concentration of the reacting species varies, that is, to solutions of a single salt. If the solution contains two electrolytes with dissimilar concentration profiles in the diffusion layer, then a second independent measurement is needed to establish the reactant concentration at the electrode. Interferometric methods are considered in detail by Muller (M14). [Pg.216]

Related to chemical pollution - referring to all kind of contamination (mineral and organic) - there is a clear distinction between point-source pollution and diffuse pollution. It appears that it is easier to take measures for point-source pollution, for instance, the improvement of the wastewater treatment plants, even if the treatments for specific compounds (pesticides, emerging compounds, etc.) still need further research. Measures for diffuse pollution can be more complex because some of them require real political decisions, for instance to interfere on agricultural practices to reduce inorganic and organic fertilisers. [Pg.416]

We start with the case where the initial electron transfer reaction is fast enough not to interfere kinetically in the electrochemical response.1 Under these conditions, the follow-up reaction is the only possible rate-limiting factor other than diffusion. The electrochemical response is a function of two parameters, the first-order (or pseudo-first-order) equilibrium constant, K, and a dimensionless kinetic parameter, 2, that measures the competition between chemical reaction and diffusion. In cyclic voltammetry,... [Pg.80]


See other pages where Interference diffusion measurement is mentioned: [Pg.574]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.858]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.386]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion measurements

Diffusivity measurement

Interference diffusivities

Interference measurement

Measuring diffusivities

© 2024 chempedia.info