Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial tension coalescence

It is quite clear, first of all, that since emulsions present a large interfacial area, any reduction in interfacial tension must reduce the driving force toward coalescence and should promote stability. We have here, then, a simple thermodynamic basis for the role of emulsifying agents. Harkins [17] mentions, as an example, the case of the system paraffin oil-water. With pure liquids, the inter-facial tension was 41 dyn/cm, and this was reduced to 31 dyn/cm on making the aqueous phase 0.00 IM in oleic acid, under which conditions a reasonably stable emulsion could be formed. On neutralization by 0.001 M sodium hydroxide, the interfacial tension fell to 7.2 dyn/cm, and if also made O.OOIM in sodium chloride, it became less than 0.01 dyn/cm. With olive oil in place of the paraffin oil, the final interfacial tension was 0.002 dyn/cm. These last systems emulsified spontaneously—that is, on combining the oil and water phases, no agitation was needed for emulsification to occur. [Pg.504]

Gravitational force favors the separation of gas from liquid in a disperse system, causing the bubbles to rise to the hquid surface and the liquid contained in the bubble walls to drain downward to the main body of the liquid. Interfacial tension favors the coalescence and ultimate disappearance of bubbles indeed, it is the cause of bubble destruction upon the rupture of the laminae. [Pg.1418]

Inteifacial tension. A high interfacial tension promotes rapid coalescence and generally requires high mechanical agitation to produce small droplets. A low interracial tension allows drop breakup with low agitation intensity but also leads to slow coalescence rates. Interfacial tension usually decreases as solubility and solute concentration increase and falls to zero at the plait point (Fig. 15-10). [Pg.1460]

Coalescence The coalescence of droplets can occur whenever two or more droplets collide and remain in contact long enough for the continuous-phase film to become so thin that a hole develops and allows the liquid to become one body. A clean system with a high interfacial tension will generally coalesce quite rapidly. Particulates and polymeric films tend to accumulate at droplet surfaces and reduce the rate of coalescence. This can lead to the ouildup of a rag layer at the liquid-hquid interface in an extractor. Rapid drop breakup and rapid coalescence can significantly enhance the rate of mass transfer between phases. [Pg.1470]

With respect to good adhesion, reduced interfacial tension, fine distribution of TLCP phase, and the use of a compatibilizer can be very effective for this purpose. Remarkably improved mechanical properties (good impact properties as well as tensile properties) can be obtained with optimum amounts of the compatibilizer. Excess amounts of the compatibilizer causes the emulsifying effect to coalesce the dispersed TLCP... [Pg.599]

Mechanical compatibilization is accomplished by reducing the size of the dispersed phase. The latter is determined by the balance between drop breakup and coalescence process, which in turn is governed by the type and severity of the stress, interfacial tension between the two phases, and the rheological characteristics of the components [9]. The need to reduce potential energy initiates the agglomeration process, which is less severe if the interfacial tension is small. Addition... [Pg.299]

The selection of a suitable emulsifying agent and its appropriate concentration are matters of experience and of trial and error. It is not necessary to use emulsifier amounts above the required quantities to produce complete interfacial films, unless an increase in the viscosity of the dispersion medium is intended. Reducing the interfacial tension makes emulsification easy but does not by itself prevent coalescence of the particles and resultant phase separation. Frequently, combinations of two or more emulsifying agents are used [2] to (a) adequately reduce the interfacial tension, (b) produce a sufficiently rigid interfacial film, and (c)... [Pg.269]

Interfacial tension. The larger the interfacial tension between the two liquids, the more readily coalescence will occur. However, on the other hand, the higher the interfacial tension, the more difficult will be the dispersion in the extraction. [Pg.185]

Sudden Cooling of Emulsion (Thermal Shock) Sudden temperature drop or freezing i.e., giving a thermal shock) of an emulsion mostly enhances the interfacial tension between the two immiscible phases thereby causing coalescence. [Pg.402]

Note 2 Representative mechanisms for coarsening at the late stage of phase separation are (1) material flow in domains driven by interfacial tension (observed in a co-continuous morphology), (2) the growth of domain size by evaporation from smaller droplets and condensation into larger droplets, and (3) coalescence (fusion) of more than two droplets. The mechanisms are usually called (1) Siggia s mechanism, (2) Ostwald ripening (or the Lifshitz-Slyozov mechanism), and (3) coalescence. [Pg.197]

A high-interfacial-tension system is more easily coalesced than one of low interfacial tension (J2). [Pg.89]

What is the mechanism which results in rapid coalescence if mass transfer occurs from the drops but slow or no coalescence if both phases are mutually saturated Interfacial turbulence caused by local gradients in interfacial tension looks promising. [Pg.91]

Increasing temperature has the effect of decreasing emulsion stability this has been demonstrated by Kunieda et al. [11,14], among others, and is due to the increase of the rate of coalescence of the dispersed phase droplets with increasing thermal energy. Pons et al. [100] also noted that a temperature increase caused an increase in average droplet size due to increasing interfacial tension. [Pg.186]

A stabilising effect in the presence of salt was also noted by Aronson and Petko [90]. Addition of various electrolytes was shown to lower the interfacial tension of the system. Thus, there was increased adsorption of emulsifier at oil/water interface and an increased resistance to coalescence. Salt addition also increased HIPE stability during freeze-thaw cycles. Film rupture, due to expansion of the water droplets on freezing, did not occur when aqueous solutions of various electrolytes were used. The salt reduced the rate of ice formation and caused a small amount of aqueous solution to remain unfrozen. The dispersed phase droplets could therefore deform gradually, allowing expansion of the oil films to avoid rupture [114]. [Pg.187]

In the above relevance list, only the density and the viscosity of the liquid were introduced. The material properties of the gas are of no importance as compared to the physical properties of the liquid. It was also ascertained by measurement that the interfacial tension cr does not affect the stirrer power. Furthermore, measurements revealed that the coalescence behavior of the material system is not affected if aqueous glycerol or cane syrup mixtures are used to increase viscosity in model experiments (7). [Pg.10]


See other pages where Interfacial tension coalescence is mentioned: [Pg.1836]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.1836]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.1417]    [Pg.1476]    [Pg.1476]    [Pg.1479]    [Pg.1484]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.180]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.683 ]




SEARCH



Coalesce

Coalescence

Coalescence, effect interfacial tension

Coalescent

Coalescents

Coalescer

Coalescers

Coalescing

Interfacial tension

© 2024 chempedia.info