Interfacial mass density

Piezoelectric crystal sensors are passive solid-state electronic devices, which can respond to changes in temperature, pressure, and most importantly, to changes in physical properties at the interface between the device surface and a foreign fluid or solid. Such changes in physical properties include variations in interfacial mass density, elasticity, viscosity, and layer thickness. 

The mass-transfer coefficients depend on complex functions of diffii-sivity, viscosity, density, interfacial tension, and turbulence. Similarly, the mass-transfer area of the droplets depends on complex functions of viscosity, interfacial tension, density difference, extractor geometry, agitation intensity, agitator design, flow rates, and interfacial rag deposits. Only limited success has been achieved in correlating extractor performance with these basic principles. The lumped parameter deals directly with the ultimate design criterion, which is the height of an extraction tower. 

Quartz crystal microbalance — The quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) or nanobalance (QCN) is a thickness-shear-mode acoustic wave mass-sensitive detector based on the effect of an attached foreign mass on the resonant frequency of an oscillating quartz crystal. The QCM responds to any interfacial mass change. The response of a QCM is also extremely sensitive to the mass (density) and viscoelastic changes at the solid-solution interface [i-vi]. 

The translational order parameter permits an estimate of the width of the interfaces. The 10-90 width is defined to be the length over which a specific interfacial order parameter changes from 10% to 90% of the bulk solid value. We have estimated the 10-90 widths of the interfaces using a fit by a simple hyperbolic tangent function, used frequently in earlier studies [17]. In the case of the mass-density profile, the translational order parameter may be extracted from a fitting procedure,... 

Bravo and Fair s Correlation for Randomly Packed Columns Bravo and Fair (1982) developed a method of estimating the mass transfer characteristics for distillation in randomly packed columns. Their method is based on Onda s Eqs. 12.3.26 and 12.3.29 for the vapor-and liquid-phase mass transfer coefficients, but uses an alternative correlation for the interfacial area density... 

Although the method of Bravo and Fair makes use of Onda s equations for k and k, it should be noted that the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficients estimated from the two procedures will be different since Eq. 12.3.29 for k depends on the interfacial area density (through the liquid-phase Reynolds number). 

We now repeat the calculation using the Bravo and Fair correlations. The vapor-phase mass transfer coefficient is exactly the same as determined above. We need only compute the interfacial area density and the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient. We begin by computing the capillary number... 

This form of the mixture model is called the drift flux model. In particular cases the flow calculations is significantly simplified when the problem is described in terms of drift velocities, as for example when ad is constant or time dependent only. However, in reactor technology this model formulation is restricted to multiphase cold flow studies as the drift-flux model cannot be adopted simulating reactive systems in which the densities are not constants and interfacial mass transfer is required. 

Bove et al [15] specified an outlet pressure boundary instead, and the axial liquid velocity components were determined in accordance with a global mass balance. This approach is strictly only valid when the changes in liquid density due to interfacial mass transfer or temperature changes are negligible, as the local changes are not known a priori. 

Thus, the interfacial friction can be evaluated from measurement of AT and A/. This procedure has been applied to a number of systems in which weak physical adsorption occurs, such as the adsorption of Xe, Kr, N2 on Au, and of H2O and CeH on Ag [34-38]. In all the above cases slippage was observed, and the ratio of the coefficient of sliding friction to the mass density was of the order x/Amf = (10 - 10 )s As an example, the frictional stress acting on the monolayer Xe film sliding on a Ag(lll) surface at a velocity v = 1 cms F = xv, equals about 10Nm [40]. It is much smaller than typical shear stresses involved in sliding of a steel block on a steel surface under boundary lubrication condition (Eq. 6), which is of order 10 Nm 2 [39]. 

The derivation of the overall interfacial mass conservation equation is carried out in a fashion similar to the bulk mass conservation derivation in Section 3.1. The result will be of the same form as Eq. (3.1.4), except for the addition of a term corresponding to the jump in across the interface. With r the interface mass density (kgm ), the equation is... 

The determination of the driving force for the interfacial mass transfer is very difficult in extraction columns since no pure plug flow exists within the column This is one of the most important differences between gas-liquid and liquid-Uquid contactors. Because of the small density differences in liquid-liquid systems there exists a relatively high rate of axial backmixing of dispersed as well as of continuous phase. Backmixing reduces the concentration differences along the column height. 

For individual chemical species, the mass conservation postulate requires modification to account for mass generation due to chemical reactions. The mass of component / in a body, expressed as the volume integral of mass density pp may increase due to the production of / by homogeneous (bulk phase) and heterogeneous (interfacial, a) chemical reactions ... 

---