Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface polystyrene

Figure 3 A calculated reflectivity profile for a perdeuterated polystyrene film with a thickness of SO nm on a silicon substrate. The calculation was for a specimen where the interfaces between the specimen and air and the specimen and the substrate were sharp. This causes the reflectivity on average (shown by the dashed line) to decrease in proportion to k or 9. The separation distance between the minima of the oscillations diractly yields the thickness of the specimen, as shown. Figure 3 A calculated reflectivity profile for a perdeuterated polystyrene film with a thickness of SO nm on a silicon substrate. The calculation was for a specimen where the interfaces between the specimen and air and the specimen and the substrate were sharp. This causes the reflectivity on average (shown by the dashed line) to decrease in proportion to k or 9. The separation distance between the minima of the oscillations diractly yields the thickness of the specimen, as shown.
In numerous applications of polymeric materials multilayers of films are used. This practice is found in microelectronic, aeronautical, and biomedical applications to name a few. Developing good adhesion between these layers requires interdiffusion of the molecules at the interfaces between the layers over size scales comparable to the molecular diameter (tens of nm). In addition, these interfaces are buried within the specimen. Aside from this practical aspect, interdififlision over short distances holds the key for critically evaluating current theories of polymer difllision. Theories of polymer interdiffusion predict specific shapes for the concentration profile of segments across the interface as a function of time. Interdiffiision studies on bilayered specimen comprised of a layer of polystyrene (PS) on a layer of perdeuterated (PS) d-PS, can be used as a model system that will capture the fundamental physics of the problem. Initially, the bilayer will have a sharp interface, which upon annealing will broaden with time. [Pg.667]

Figure 4 The reflectivity multiplied by kjQ as a function of for a bilayer of normal polystyrene on perdautarated polystyrene before and after heating at 105.5° C for 2 minutes. The data is plotted in this manner since for sharp interfaces RkjQ is a constant at large k -... Figure 4 The reflectivity multiplied by kjQ as a function of for a bilayer of normal polystyrene on perdautarated polystyrene before and after heating at 105.5° C for 2 minutes. The data is plotted in this manner since for sharp interfaces RkjQ is a constant at large k -...
The main experimental techniques used to study the failure processes at the scale of a chain have involved the use of deuterated polymers, particularly copolymers, at the interface and the measurement of the amounts of the deuterated copolymers at each of the fracture surfaces. The presence and quantity of the deuterated copolymer has typically been measured using forward recoil ion scattering (FRES) or secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS). The technique was originally used in a study of the effects of placing polystyrene-polymethyl methacrylate (PS-PMMA) block copolymers of total molecular weight of 200,000 Da at an interface between polyphenylene ether (PPE or PPO) and PMMA copolymers [1]. The PS block is miscible in the PPE. The use of copolymers where just the PS block was deuterated and copolymers where just the PMMA block was deuterated showed that, when the interface was fractured, the copolymer molecules all broke close to their junction points The basic idea of this technique is shown in Fig, I. [Pg.223]

The main results of this miero-mechanical model in the quasi-static regime have been compared with experimental results obtained by placing polystyrene (PS)-polyvinyl pyridine (PVP) diblock copolymers with a short PVP block between PS and PVP homopolymers. The fracture toughness was found to increase linearly with E from that of the bare PS/PVP interface, while the slope of the line increased with the degree of polymerization of the block being pulled out. If the data for the different copolymers were plotted as AG vs. (where... [Pg.226]

The toughness of interfaces between immiscible amorphous polymers without any coupling agent has been the subject of a number of recent studies [15-18]. The width of a polymer/polymer interface is known to be controlled by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter x between the two polymers. The value of x between a random copolymer and a homopolymer can be adjusted by changing the copolymer composition, so the main experimental protocol has been to measure the interface toughness between a copolymer and a homopolymer as a function of copolymer composition. In addition, the interface width has been measured by neutron reflection. Four different experimental systems have been used, all containing styrene. Schnell et al. studied PS joined to random copolymers of styrene with bromostyrene and styrene with paramethyl styrene [17,18]. Benkoski et al. joined polystyrene to a random copolymer of styrene with vinyl pyridine (PS/PS-r-PVP) [16], whilst Brown joined PMMA to a random copolymer of styrene with methacrylate (PMMA/PS-r-PMMA) [15]. The results of the latter study are shown in Fig. 9. [Pg.233]

Polymer-polymer fractal interfaces may result from the interdiffusion of monomers or of polymers themselves. Koizumi et al. [31] annealed the interface between polystyrene and a styrene-isoprene diblock polymer at 150 C and showed extensive roughening of the interface by mutual interdiffusion on a micron scale (Fig. 8). [Pg.337]

Fig. 8. Electron micrograph.s showing the interface between polystyrene (top) and a styrene-isoprene diblock polymer (bottom), annealed at I50°C for the times shown. Isoprene units are stained and appear black) (reproduced from [31], copyright American Chemical Society). Fig. 8. Electron micrograph.s showing the interface between polystyrene (top) and a styrene-isoprene diblock polymer (bottom), annealed at I50°C for the times shown. Isoprene units are stained and appear black) (reproduced from [31], copyright American Chemical Society).
We present here a simple experiment, conceived to test both the reptation model and the minor chain model, by Welp et al. [50] and Agrawal et al. [51-53]. Consider the HDH/DHD interface formed with two layers of polystyrene with chain architectures shown in Fig. 5. In one of the layers, the central 50% of the chain is deuterated. This constitutes a triblock copolymer of labeled and normal polystyrene, which is, denoted HDH. In the second layer, the labeling has been reversed so that the two end fractions of the chain are deuterated, denoted by DHD. At temperatures above the glass transition temperature of the polystyrene ( 100°C), the polymer chains begin to interdiffuse across the... [Pg.363]

Fig. 6. The ripple experiment at the interface between a bilayer of HDH- and DHD-labeled polystyrene, showing the interdifussion behavior of matching chains. The protonated sections of the chain are marked by filled circles. The D concentration profiles are shown on the right. Top the initial interface at / = 0. The D concentration profile is flat, since there is 50% deuteration on each side of the interface. Middle the interface after the chain ends have diffused across (x < / g). The deuterated chains from Que side enrich the deuterated centers on the other side, vice ver.sa for the protonated sections, and the ripple in the depth profile of D results. A ripple of opposite sign occurs for the H profile. Bottom the interface when the molecules have fully diffused across. The D profile becomes flat [20,56]. Fig. 6. The ripple experiment at the interface between a bilayer of HDH- and DHD-labeled polystyrene, showing the interdifussion behavior of matching chains. The protonated sections of the chain are marked by filled circles. The D concentration profiles are shown on the right. Top the initial interface at / = 0. The D concentration profile is flat, since there is 50% deuteration on each side of the interface. Middle the interface after the chain ends have diffused across (x < / g). The deuterated chains from Que side enrich the deuterated centers on the other side, vice ver.sa for the protonated sections, and the ripple in the depth profile of D results. A ripple of opposite sign occurs for the H profile. Bottom the interface when the molecules have fully diffused across. The D profile becomes flat [20,56].
A new process to develop interface vulcanization is grafting of selective accelerators onto a polymer chain, which in the subsequent process of vulcanization acts as an effective cure accelerator for the second polymer component in the blend. Beniska et al. [6] prepared SERFS blends where the polystyrene phase was grafted with the accelerator for curing SBR. Improved hardness, tensile strength, and abrasion resistance were obtained. Blends containing modified polystyrene and rw-1,4-polybutadiene showed similar characteristics as SBS triblock copolymers. [Pg.464]

Addition of poly(styrene-block-butadiene) block copolymer to the polystyrene-polybutadiene-styrene ternary system first showed a characteristic decrease in interfacial tension followed by a leveling off. The leveling off is indicative of saturation of the interface by the solubilizing agent. [Pg.668]

Figure 17 Raman spectra of a glass fiber/matrix interfaces. (A) styrene monomer (B) untreated E-glass fiber coated with polystyrene, (C) E-glass fiber treated with y-methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane. Figure 17 Raman spectra of a glass fiber/matrix interfaces. (A) styrene monomer (B) untreated E-glass fiber coated with polystyrene, (C) E-glass fiber treated with y-methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane.
Organic solvents are most commonly used, and encapsulating polymers include ethylcellu-lose, NC, polvvinylidene chloride, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl acetate and others. Inter facial polymerization produces a polymer such as nylon at the interface between layered solns of two precursor materials such as (in the case of a nylon) a diamine and a diacid (Refs 3 11). If the particle or drop-... [Pg.142]

Fig. 5. Hydrogen depth profile of a deuterated polystyrene PS(D) film deposited on a protonated polystyrene PS(H) film on top of a silicon wafer as obtained by l5N-nuclear reaction analysis ( 5N-NRA). The small hydrogen peak at the surface is due to contamination (probably water) of the surface. The sharp interface between PS(D) and PS(H) is smeared by the experimental resolution (approx. 10 nm at a depth of 80 nm) [57], The solid line is a guide for the eye... Fig. 5. Hydrogen depth profile of a deuterated polystyrene PS(D) film deposited on a protonated polystyrene PS(H) film on top of a silicon wafer as obtained by l5N-nuclear reaction analysis ( 5N-NRA). The small hydrogen peak at the surface is due to contamination (probably water) of the surface. The sharp interface between PS(D) and PS(H) is smeared by the experimental resolution (approx. 10 nm at a depth of 80 nm) [57], The solid line is a guide for the eye...
The resolution of infra-red densitometry (IR-D) is on the other hand more in the region of some micrometers even with the use of IR-microscopes. The interface is also viewed from the side (Fig. 4d) and the density profile is obtained mostly between deuterated and protonated polymers. The strength of specific IR-bands is monitored during a scan across the interface to yield a concentration profile of species. While in the initial experiments on polyethylene diffusion the resolution was of the order of 60 pm [69] it has been improved e.g. in polystyrene diffusion experiments [70] to 10 pm by the application of a Fourier transform-IR-microscope. This technique is nicely suited to measure profiles on a micrometer scale as well as interdiffusion coefficients of polymers but it is far from reaching molecular resolution. [Pg.376]

Fig. 8. X-ray reflection diagram of a thin polystyrene film on float glass [160]. The reflectivity R is plotted against the glancing angle . The film is spin coated from solution. A model fit (dashed line) to the reflectivity data is also shown where the following parameters are obtained film thickness = 59.1 0.1 nm, interface roughness glass-polymer = 0.4 0.1 nm, surface roughness polymer-air = 0.6+1 nm, mean polymer density = 1.05 + 0.01 g/cm-3. The X-ray wavelength is 0.154nm... Fig. 8. X-ray reflection diagram of a thin polystyrene film on float glass [160]. The reflectivity R is plotted against the glancing angle . The film is spin coated from solution. A model fit (dashed line) to the reflectivity data is also shown where the following parameters are obtained film thickness = 59.1 0.1 nm, interface roughness glass-polymer = 0.4 0.1 nm, surface roughness polymer-air = 0.6+1 nm, mean polymer density = 1.05 + 0.01 g/cm-3. The X-ray wavelength is 0.154nm...
Fig. 10. X-ray reflectivity curves of polystyrene (PS)/poly-p-bromostyrene (PBrS) on a glass substrate before (solid line) and after annealing for 13 h at 130 °C (dashed tine) [191]. The width of the interface changes from 1.3 nm to 2.0 nm due to interfacial mixing of components. The X-ray wavelength is 0.154 nm and films have a thickness of 37.8 nm (PS) and 45.0 nm (PBrS), respectively... Fig. 10. X-ray reflectivity curves of polystyrene (PS)/poly-p-bromostyrene (PBrS) on a glass substrate before (solid line) and after annealing for 13 h at 130 °C (dashed tine) [191]. The width of the interface changes from 1.3 nm to 2.0 nm due to interfacial mixing of components. The X-ray wavelength is 0.154 nm and films have a thickness of 37.8 nm (PS) and 45.0 nm (PBrS), respectively...
The first study utilizing this method was reported by Schuller in 1966 [65]. Schuller used polystyrene latex beads that were spread on a salt-containing aqueous subphase in order to keep the particles at the interface. tt-A plots of the floating particles were determined, which showed several phase regions with reproducible transition points. The author determined the particle diameters from the A-value, at which a steep rise in the isotherm occurred. Moreover, Schuller also spread millimeter-sized Styropor particles and found isotherms of similar shape [66]. By taking pictures at different surface pressure, he was able to correlate the shape with different states of order in the monolayer. Shortly after that. [Pg.214]

For the characterization of Langmuir films, Fulda and coworkers [75-77] used anionic and cationic core-shell particles prepared by emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization. These particles have several advantages over those used in early publications First, the particles do not contain any stabihzer or emulsifier, which is eventually desorbed upon spreading and disturbs the formation of a particle monolayer at the air-water interface. Second, the preparation is a one-step process leading directly to monodisperse particles 0.2-0.5 jim in diameter. Third, the nature of the shell can be easily varied by using different hydrophilic comonomers. In Table 1, the particles and their characteristic properties are hsted. Most of the studies were carried out using anionic particles with polystyrene as core material and polyacrylic acid in the shell. [Pg.218]

Torres, F. E., Russel, W. B., and Schowalter, W. R., Floe structure and growth kinetics for rapid shear coagulation of polystyrene colloids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 142, 554-574 (1991a). Torres, F. E., Russel, W. B., and Schowalter, W. R., Simulations of coagulation in viscous flows. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 145, 51-73 (1991b). [Pg.204]

In suspension polymerization, the monomer is agitated in a solvent to form droplets, and then stabilized through the use of surfactants to form micelles. The added initiator is soluble in the solvent such that the reaction is initiated at the skin of the micelle. Polymerization starts at the interface and proceeds towards the center of the droplet. Polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride are often produced via suspension polymerization processes. [Pg.56]


See other pages where Interface polystyrene is mentioned: [Pg.808]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.2694]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.828]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.393]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.130 ]




SEARCH



Interface poly polystyrene

Poly interface with polystyrene, diblock copolymers

Poly interface with polystyrene, fracture energy

Poly interface with polystyrene, interfacial

Poly interface with polystyrene, random copolymers

Polystyrene interface with poly

Polystyrene interface with poly , diblock

Polystyrene interface with poly , fracture

Polystyrene interface with poly , random

Polystyrene water interface, surfactant adsorption

© 2024 chempedia.info