Interface ideal polarized

Potentiometric measurements are done under the condition of zero current. Therefore, the domain of this group of sensors lies at the zero-current axis (see Fig. 5.1). From the viewpoint of charge transfer, there are two types of electrochemical interfaces ideally polarized (purely capacitive) and nonpolarized. As the name implies, the ideally polarized interface is only hypothetical. Although possible in principle, there are no chemical sensors based on a polarized interface at present and we consider only the nonpolarized interface at which at least one charged species partitions between the two phases. The Thought Experiments constructed in Chapter 5, around Fig. 5.1, involved a redox couple, for the sake of simplicity. Thus, an electron was the charged species that communicated between the two phases. In this section and in the area of potentiometric sensors, we consider any charged species electrons, ions, or both. 

An ideally polarized electrode is rigorously defined as the electrode at which no charge transfer across the metal/solution interface can occur, regardless of the potential externally imposed on the electrode. At any fixed potential, such an electrode system attains a true state of equilibrium. 

The situation that no charge transfer across the interface occurs is named the ideal polarized or blocked interface. Such interfaces do not permit, due to thermodynamic or kinetic reasons, either electron or ion transfer. They possess Galvani potentials fixed by the electrolyte and charge. Of course, the ideal polarizable interface is practically a limiting case of the interfaces with charge transfer, because any interface is always permeable to ions to some extent. Therefore, only an approximation of the ideal polarizable interface can be realized experimentally (Section III.D). 

Kakiuchi and Senda [36] measured the electrocapillary curves of the ideally polarized water nitrobenzene interface by the drop time method using the electrolyte dropping electrode [37] at various concentrations of the aqueous (LiCl) and the organic solvent (tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate) electrolytes. An example of the electrocapillary curve for this system is shown in Fig. 2. The surface excess charge density Q, and the relative surface excess concentrations T " and rppg of the Li cation and the tetraphenylborate anion respectively, were evaluated from the surface tension data by using Eq. (21). The relative surface excess concentrations and of the d anion and the... 

Girault and Schiffrin [6] and Samec et al. [39] used the pendant drop video-image method to measure the surface tension of the ideally polarized water-1,2-dichloroethane interface in the presence of KCl [6] or LiCl [39] in water and tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate in 1,2-dichloroethane. Electrocapillary curves of a shape resembling that for the water-nitrobenzene interface were obtained, but a detailed analysis of the surface tension data was not undertaken. An independent measurement of the zero-charge potential difference by the streaming-jet electrode technique [40] in the same system provided the value identical with the potential of the electrocapillary maximum. On the basis of the standard potential difference of —0.225 V for the tetrabutylammonium ion transfer, the zero-charge potential difference was estimated as equal to 8 10 mV [41]. 

In a closely related study, Marecek et al. [46] used the pendant drop video-image method to investigate the adsorption and surface reactions of calix[4]arene ligands at the ideally polarized water-1,2-dichloroethane interface. The difference between the surface tensions in acidic and alkaline media was ascribed to a difference in the charge on the... 

Koryta et al. [48] first stressed the relevance of adsorbed phospholipid monolayers at the ITIES for clarification of biological membrane phenomena. Girault and Schiffrin [49] first attempted to characterize quantitatively the monolayers of phosphatidylcholine and phos-phatidylethanolamine at the ideally polarized water-1,2-dichloroethane interface with electrocapillary measurements. The results obtained indicate the importance of the surface pH in the ionization of the amino group of phosphatidylethanolamine. Kakiuchi et al. [50] used the video-image method to study the conditions for obtaining electrocapillary curves of the dilauroylphosphatidylcholine monolayer formed on the ideally polarized water-nitrobenzene interface. This phospholipid was found to lower markedly the surface tension by forming a stable monolayer when the interface was polarized so that the aqueous phase had a negative potential with respect to the nitrobenzene phase [50,51] (cf. Fig. 5). 

Samec et al. [15] used the AC polarographic method to study the potential dependence of the differential capacity of the ideally polarized water-nitrobenzene interface at various concentrations of the aqueous (LiCl) and the organic solvent (tetrabutylammonium tetra-phenylborate) electrolytes. The capacity showed a single minimum at an interfacial potential difference, which is close to that for the electrocapillary maximum. The experimental capacity was found to agree well with the capacity calculated from Eq. (28) for 1 /C,- = 0 and for the capacities of the space charge regions calculated using the GC theory,... 

Kakiuchi et al. [75] used the capacitance measurements to study the adsorption of dilauroylphosphatidylcholine at the ideally polarized water-nitrobenzene interface, as an alternative approach to the surface tension measurements for the same system [51]. In the potential range, where the aqueous phase had a negative potential with respect to the nitrobenzene phase, the interfacial capacity was found to decrease with the increasing phospholipid concentration in the organic solvent phase (Fig. 11). The saturated mono-layer in the liquid-expanded state was formed at the phospholipid concentration exceeding 20 /amol dm, with an area of 0.73 nm occupied by a single molecule. The adsorption was described by the Frumkin isotherm. 

The electrical double layer has also been investigated at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions and at the solid electrolyte-electrolyte solution interface. Under certain conditions, the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) has the properties of an ideally polarized interphase. The dissolved electrolyte must have the following properties ... 

When LaFa is in direct contact with metals, such as Ag, Hg, Pb, Ga, Cd, ZnHg or La, the contact attains the properties of an ideally polarized interface [96] with poorly defined E ise values. 

It is possible to find a range in which the electrode potential is changed and no steady state net current flows. An electrode is called ideally polarized when no charge flows accross the interface, regardless of the interfacial potential gradient. In real systems, this situation is observed only in a restricted potential range, either because electronic aceptors or donors in the electrolyte (redox systems) are absent or, even in their presence, when the electrode kinetics are far too slow in that potential range. This represents a non-equilibrium situation since the electrochemical potential of electrons is different in both phases. 

A notable difference between these two relationships is that the Gibbs-Lippmann equation contains one more independent variable parameter, the interfacial charge. It cannot be determined directly. Several unsuccessful attempts to design chemical sensors (e.g., the immunosensor) based on the measurement of adsorbed surface charge have been made. There are no ideally polarized interfaces that are sufficiently ideal to allow such direct measurement of interfacial charge. 

For a DC measurement, what type of interface would that have to be, ideally polarized or nonpolarized Would the same restriction apply in the case of an AC measurement ... 

A gold electrode with self-assembled monolayers, in the absence of any redox species, is an almost ideally polarized (i.e., purely capacitive) interface. A Nyquist... 

Although the thermodynamic definition of an ideally polarized interface is unequivocal [28], the polarizability of an actual interface is understood differently, depending on what is to be measured at the interface. Gavach et al. [3] obtained the polarized range of c. 150 mV at the interface between an aqueous 10 M KCl solution and a nitrobenzene solution of dodecyltrimethylammonium dode-... 

Kinetic data that have been obtained so far fall into three groups. The first comprises data measured without the proper ohmic drop compensation or subtraction and/or the ideal polarization of the liquid-liquid interface being considered. Thus, from kinetic measurements made by Gavach et al. [138] Buck and coworkers [121, 122], or Samec et al. [38], rather low values of the standard rate constant kl were... 

The situation is fundamentally different near an interface due to a significant redistribution of charge. Consider, for example, the potential distribution in an electrochemical cell at open circuit. Consider that a potential can be applied between the two metal electrodes such that no current flows. A situation like this is described in Section 5.1. The electrodes can be considered to be ideally polarized since a potential can be applied without passage of current. 

---