Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Repulsion interaction

The analysis of Table 31.2 by CFA is shown in Fig. 31.11. As can be seen, the result is very similar to that obtained by log double-centering in Figs. 31.9 and 31.10. The first latent variable expresses a contrast between NO2 substituted chalcones and the others. The second latent variable seems to be related to the electronic properties of the substituents. The contributions of the two latent variables to the total inertia is 96%. The double-closed biplot of Fig. 31.11 does not allow a direct interpretation of unipolar and bipolar axes in terms of the original data X. The other rules of interpretation are similar to those of the log double-centered biplot in the previous subsection. Compounds and methods that seem to have moved away from the center and in the same directions possess a positive interaction (attraction). Those that moved in opposite directions show a negative interaction (repulsion). [Pg.132]

H2-----H2 interaction repulsive. The net result is a positive overlap population... [Pg.87]

All measurements, of course, have to be made at a finite concentration. This implies that interparticle interactions cannot be fully neglected. However, in very dilute solutions we can safely assume that more than two particles have only an extremely small chance to meet [72]. Thus only the interaction between two particles has to be considered. There are two types of interaction between particles in solution. One results from thermodynamic interactions (repulsion or attraction), and the other is caused by the distortion of the laminar fiow due to the presence of the macromolecules. If the particles are isolated only the laminar flow field is perturbed, and this determines the intrinsic viscosity but when the particles come closer together the distorted flow fields start to overlap and cause a further increase of the viscosity. The latter is called the hydrodynamic interaction and was calculated by Oseen to various approximations [3,73]. Figure 7 elucidates the effect. [Pg.134]

Desorption can proceed via several mechanisms. For solids with a negative electron alSnity such as Ar [49,149-151] and N2 [153], the extended electron cloud around a metastable center will interact repulsively with the surrounding medium and metastables formed at the film-vacuum interface will be expelled into vacuum (the so-called cavity expulsion mechanism [161]). Also permitted in solids with positive electron affinities (e.g., CO) is the transfer of energy intramolecular vibration to the molecule-surface bond with the resulting desorption of a molecule in lower vibrational level [153,155,158-160]. Desorption of metastables via the excitation of dissociative molecular (or excimer) electronic states is also possible [49,149-151,154,156,157]. A concise review of the topic can be found in Ref. 162. [Pg.224]

As has already been pointed out (see p. 59), the carbon chain in ribitol17 is nonplanar, and the molecule adopts a sickle conformation.18 This conformation is just one of the conformational changes that can be directly attributed to interaction (repulsion) between nonbonded atoms, Were ribitol planar, the contact between 0-2 and 0-4 would be close, as shown in Fig. 3. The C-O bonds would be... [Pg.104]

Most liquid-crystalline polymer solutions have a large second virial coefficient ( > 10 4 cm 3mol/g2) [41], which means that it is rather difficult to find poor or theta solvents for these polymers and that liquid-crystalline polymers in solution interact repulsively. This fact is essential in formulating their static solution properties (osmotic pressure, phase separation, etc.). [Pg.93]

In many-electron atoms, the Schrodinger equation cannot be solved exactly, so approximations must be made. The simplest and crudest approximation is to neglect entirely electron-electron interactions (repulsions) and electron spin. In this way, hydrogenic orbitals are found as solutions. Into these orbitals we then place the electrons, according to the aufbau principle, and thus derive electron... [Pg.91]

Figure 1. Adsorption isotherms for interacting (repulsive as well attractive) dimers and 10-mers (a) k= 2, w / kHT = -10 (b) k = 2, w / kgT = 0 (c) k = 2, w / knT = +10 (d) A = 10, w / ksT =+10. The full circles represent results from Monte Carlo Simulation in the lattice-gas model. Comparison between experimental isotherm of CH4 from ref. [11] (open triangles, T = 77.35 K open diamonds, T = 96.50 K) and theoretical isotherm [from Eq. (6)] of dimers in the lattice-gas approximation (full triangles, T = 77.35 K, w = 0.61 Kcal/mol full diamonds T = 96.50 K,w = 0.61 Kcal/mol). Figure 1. Adsorption isotherms for interacting (repulsive as well attractive) dimers and 10-mers (a) k= 2, w / kHT = -10 (b) k = 2, w / kgT = 0 (c) k = 2, w / knT = +10 (d) A = 10, w / ksT =+10. The full circles represent results from Monte Carlo Simulation in the lattice-gas model. Comparison between experimental isotherm of CH4 from ref. [11] (open triangles, T = 77.35 K open diamonds, T = 96.50 K) and theoretical isotherm [from Eq. (6)] of dimers in the lattice-gas approximation (full triangles, T = 77.35 K, w = 0.61 Kcal/mol full diamonds T = 96.50 K,w = 0.61 Kcal/mol).
Atomic nuclei consist of nucleons (protons and neutrons). The total number of nucleons is denoted as A and is called the mass number. The nucleus charge, z, is equal to the number of protons. The nucleus bond energy comprises a combination of the nuclear interaction (attraction) energy of the nucleons and the Coulomb interaction (repulsion) energy of the protons. The characteristic feature of the nuclear forces appears to be short-range action nucleons interact only when they are in a very close contact at a distance of about 10 13 cm. Another important feature is the incompressibility of the nucleons and, due to this, the volume of the nucleus grows in proportion to the mass number and its radius, in proportion to Al,i. [Pg.7]

Actually, the classical charge-cloud repulsion is somewhat inappropriate for electrons in that smearing an electron (a particle) out into a cloud forces it to repel itself, as any two regions of the cloud interact repulsively. One way to compensate for this physically incorrect electron self-interaction is with a good exchange-correlation functional (below). [Pg.453]

Although these surface scans are approximate, and probably suffer somewhat from the requirement of D3h symmetry, they do reveal that this remarkably exothermic, and thermally allowed, reaction has an unusually high activation barrier. Acetylene is neither a good donor nor a good acceptor, and the approach of three acetylenes, even in a geometry which produces both in-plane and out-of-plane aromatic sextets, results in no strong HOMO-LUMO interactions. Repulsive interactions due to the overlap of filled orbitals of the three molecules occur, but the filled and vacant orbitals of the acetylenes are too far apart in energy for any appreciable stabi-... [Pg.13]

In the case of coin metals like Au and Ag (see Fig. 3), the center of the d band lies too low and thus both bonding and antibonding levels are situated below the Fermi level and in consequence are filled making the interaction repulsive. The opposite happens with Pt, which is a good catalyst. In this case, the center of the band is situated near the Fermi level, and thus the bonding... [Pg.33]

There is a well-developed theory—the Derjaguin-Landau and Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory—to describe the interaction between particles of a lyopho-bic colloid. This is reviewed in the texts of Hunter (1987) and Hiemenz (1986) and is based on the assumption that the van der Waals interactions (attractive forces) and the electrostatic interactions (repulsive forces) can be treated separately and then combined to obtain the overall effect of both of these forces on the particles. [Pg.640]

Electrostatic interactions (repulsion and attraction) between differently charged functional groups influence the acidity and complex formation constants of the humic substances ionic strength has a marked influence on these electrostatic interactions. [Pg.301]


See other pages where Repulsion interaction is mentioned: [Pg.2587]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.98]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.236 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.236 ]




SEARCH



1,3-diaxial interaction/repulsion

Attractive or Repulsive Interactions

Colloidal interactions repulsive steric forces

Coulomb repulsive interaction

Diastereoselectivity repulsive interactions

Diffusion repulsive interactions

Direct interaction product repulsion

Direct interaction with product repulsion

Direct interaction with product repulsion DIPR) model

Direct interaction with product repulsion model

Dispersion and repulsion interactions

Electrical double layer repulsive interaction

Electrostatic Interaction and Steric Repulsion

Electrostatic interactions short-range electron shell repulsion

Energy repulsive interaction

Inter-ionic repulsive interactions

Interaction attractive and repulsive

Interaction electrostatic repulsion

Interaction energy electrostatic repulsion

Interaction energy exchange repulsion

Interaction energy steric repulsion

Interactions entropic repulsion

Interactions repulsive

Interactions repulsive

Intermolecular repulsive interactions

Interpolymer interaction repulsive

Membranes repulsive interactions

Molecular interactions Born repulsive forces

Molecular interactions Pauli repulsion

Molecular orbitals repulsive interaction

Nonbonded repulsive interactions

On a few simple properties of chains with repulsive interactions

Pauli repulsive interactions

Potential energy attraction-interaction-repulsion

Proteins repulsive interactions

Repulsion, interactions between

Repulsion, interactions between polymer-bearing

Repulsion, interactions between surfaces

Repulsion, interactions between suspensions

Repulsive Interactions in Valence Bond Theory

Repulsive Interactions, Total Interaction Pair Potentials

Repulsive coulombic interactions

Repulsive interactions between droplets

Repulsive interactions between spherical double layers

Repulsive interactions of polymers

Repulsive interactions, miscibility

Repulsive screened Coulomb interactions

Results for repulsive interactions

Short-range repulsive interactions

Steps interaction between, repulsive

Steric Repulsion and Orbital Interaction

Steric interaction/repulsion

© 2024 chempedia.info