Interaction Rate

Predominant formation of either complex fluoride or complex oxyfluoride depends on the interaction rates ratio of processes (25) and (26). The relatively high interaction rates of (27) and (28) lead to the synthesis of simple fluorides or oxyfluorides, respectively. With the availability of two or more cations in the system, the ammonium complex fluorometalates interact forming stable binary fluorides or oxyfluorides or mixtures thereof. 

Heat-flow microcalorimetry may be used, therefore, not only to detect, by means of adsorption sequences, the different surface interactions between reactants which constitute, in favorable cases, the steps of probable reaction mechanisms, but also to determine the rates of these surface processes. The comparison of the adsorption or interaction rates, deduced from the thermograms recorded during an adsorption sequence, is particularly reliable, because the arrangement of the calorimetric cells remains unchanged during all the steps of the sequence. Moreover, it should be remembered that the curves on Fig. 28 represent the adsorption or interaction rates on a very small fraction of the catalyst surface which is, very probably, active during the catalytic reaction (Table VI). It is for these... 

Drug/Food interactions Rate and extent of INH absorption is decreased by food. 

III. Partial Segregation. Theory of Finite Interaction Rate. Models for Interaction... 

System Interaction rate State of segregation (here defined) Degree of segregation (Danckwerts) State of mixedness (Zwietering)... 

No segregation. When the interaction rate is infinite compared with the conversion rate, it may be assumed that in all drops the concentration of A is the same and equal to the outlet concentration 5. When the outside mass transfer is high,... 

Generally one must expect that in practice neither of these extreme cases will hold and that there is a finite interaction rate or partial segregation. This means that dispersed drops may have a certain period during which they keep their own identity, but after a shorter or longer time (which generally is spread statistically) they will coalesce with a neighboring drop, or with another part of the dispersed phase. After exchange of concentrations, new drops will be produced. 

Experiments to measure the interaction rate in a dispersed phase system have been carried out by Madden and Damerell (M2), Miller et al. (M4),... 

When the interaction rate is measured in this way one studies the course of a chemical reaction which occurs in the dispersed phase between two components. One component (C) is present in the reactor before the experiment starts and either is dissolved in the continuous phase or homogeneously distributed in the dispersed phase. The other component (A) is added at the beginning of the experiment in a highly concentrated form in a very small extra volume of the dispersed phase. The total amount of A must at leaBt be the stoichiometric equivalent of the total amount of component C already present in the reactor. 

Madden and Damerell carried out their study in a 1.5-liter vessel of stainless steel internally coated with Teflon to prevent wetting by the aqueous dispersed phase. This reactor was stirred by means of a turbine and equipped with wall baffles. They investigated the effect of stirring rate (corresponding with a power input from 0.25 to 2 hp./m.8) and the effect of dispersed phase fraction from 0.0014 to 0.011. The interaction rate co< they found varied from 0.04 to 0.5 sec.-1 (see Fig. 25). 

Measurements were carried out in a 6-liter brass vessel stirred by means of a flat blade stirrer and equipped with 4 wall baffles. The influence of dispersed phase fraction and of stirring rate was investigated. The dispersed phase fraction was varied from 0.06 to 0.15 while the power input by the stirring was varied from 0.1 to 3 hp./m.8. The interaction rate found was invariably 0.035 sec.-1. Another experiment was carried out by Kramers and de Korver using a short rotary contactor (height = 10 cm., diameter = 9.3 cm., diameter of rotor = 8.0 cm.) which was made entirely of Teflon to prevent wetting of the wall by the aqueous dispersed phase. This reactor... 

A last possibility, which has not been reported so far, is a method in which one measures the heat of reaction, which is released when drops containing component 1 coalesce with drops containing component 2. This method is only suitable in continuous operation, as otherwise the temperature rise that would occur would affect both the interaction rate and the chemical conversion rate. All other methods mentioned so far are suitable both for batch operation and for continuous operation, with a slight preference for the latter since steady-state operation probably will give more reproducible results. A limitation of all the above methods is that only the interaction rate of an aqueous dispersed phase can be measured, because of the requirement that the chemical reaction be nearly instantaneous. A further disadvantage is that the dispersed phase itself is not of uniform composition, so that the interfacial tension may not be the same for all drops, and therefore the drop size may depend on the amount and type of reactants which the drops contain. 

Miller and associates (M4) measured the interaction rate in a liquid-liquid two-phase batch reactor by means of a light transmission technique, which has the advantage that it can be used with the aqueous phase or the organic phase dispersed. 

In this equation To is the light transmission before the dye is added, T is the light transmission when the dye has spread uniformly over all the drops of the dispersed phase, Tt is the light transmission at a time t after the dye has been added, t i is the interaction rate constant, and F is a constant which can be determined experimentally. For the derivation of this formula, one is referred to the paper by Miller et al. 

Fig. 26. Results obtained by Miller et al. in a 0.30-gal. vessel, propellor in draft tube, (a) Effect of power input and dispersed fraction, (b) Effect of system on interaction rate at 4> = 0.20.

Groothuis and Zuiderweg also measured the influence of mass transfer on the interaction rate and found that when 1.37% acetic acid was added... 

The influence of the electric potential of the surface of the drops was shown by Watanabe and Gotoh (W3) for the case of mercury droplets in aqueous solutions. In the case of oil drops in water the electric double layer is in the water phase, which makes possible a real interaction between the double layers of the two drops that approach each other. In the case of water drops in an oil phase, however, the electric double layers are on the inside of the drops, so that the interaction of these layers when two drops approach each other is much smaller [see Sonntag and Klare (S5)], which means that the potential barrier is much smaller or may even be absent, and the attraction by London-van der Waals forces predominates. This at least is a first explanation of why systems in which water is the dispersed phase show much higher interaction rates than systems in which oil is the dispersed phase. 

Time-Resolved Spectroscopy. Steady-state solvatochromic techniques provide a reasonable means to study solvation processes in supercritical media (5,17-32,43-45,59-68). But, unless the interaction rates between the solute species and the supercritical fluid are slow, these "static" methods cannot be used to study solvation kinetics. Investigation of the kinetics requires an approach that offers inherent temporal resolution. Fortunately, time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy is ideally suited for this task. 

---