Inhomogeneity factor

For pc-Au/electrolyte interfaces, Clavilier and Nguyen Van Huong256 also concluded that the crystallographic inhomogeneity factor depends on ce. Later, the influence of the crystallographic inhomogeneity of pc and monocrystalline electrodes (with various surface defects) was discussed in many papers.75,152,154 156 247-259 It has been shown that the potential of the diffuse-layer capacitance minimum for a polycrystalline electrode does not correspond to Ea=Q of the whole surface, i.e., 2J 0,< 0 at E n. 

If we assume that the adsorption isotherm for the chemisorbate is of the Temkin form, then i k" cMcoh exp(-a/0ads), where a is the transfer coefficient, with a value usually close to 0.5, and / is the inhomogeneity factor of the Pt surface, with a value of 10-11. Integrating this equation assuming that cMeoH and E are constant, we obtain... 

FIGURE 2.5 Inhomogeneity factor for random packs of spheres. Source Perkins and Johnston (1963). 

When evaluating U the analyst has to include the Us component, which in fact consists in doing a sampling of the material and therefore includes potential heterogeneity or inhomogeneity factors. This often limits the determination of U. If the analyst works properly this should not affect too much the determination of U as the sub-sampling factor is mainly an uncertainty due to weighing. Various ways exist to... 

In the first case, if the uncertainty of the assessed, i.e. certified, value is similar or larger than the between bottle homogeneity, there is no reason to include an inhomogeneity factor into the certified value. Similarly, there is no reason to suspect (unless scientific arguments exist) that one organic substance behaves differently from the others. Therefore no correction has to be applied. 

One way of testing such numerical implementations is to recover known results. In the present setting, this means recovering the results of Johnson and Cahn for the transition from circular to elliptical shapes. In fig. 10.17 we show the results for the critical size (the inverse of this size is actually plotted) at which the bifurcation from circular to elliptical shapes takes place as a function of the inhomogeneity factor 8 = where jx and jx are the shear moduli for the precipitate and the... 

A conservative assumption is that O can be set equal to zero. When the stress O equals the characteristic strength O the faUure probabUity is 63.2%. Under conditions other than tensUe loading, the stress distribution in a body is inhomogeneous. To account for this, a loading factor k is used to calculate the effective volume under stress and kVreplaces V. 

RSFs. Figure 2 exhibits the aven RSFs determined from analyses of 30 different standard samples of seven different matrices. The RSFs are matrix independent, with the spread in RSF determinations being due primarily to standard alloy inhomogeneities. It is remarkable that for all but N and O the factors range over only a decade. 

In contrast, because of the spatially variable (inhomogeneous) nature of material in a composite stiffener, the bending stiffness cannot be separated into a material factor times a geometric term as in Equation (7.6). Instead, the composite stiffener bending stiffness is... 

The porosity and permeability of CP are the most important factors determining their ability to sorb and immobilize BAS. For solving these problems, it was necessary to synthesize various types of porous and permeable CP differing in the mobility of elements of the crosslinked structure and in the rigidity of the polymer backbone. For biological problems related to the application of CP as biosorbents, it has been found necessary to use CP with a marked structural inhomogeneity. 

Leikis et al,223 used the Parsons-Zobel method to obtain the roughness factor fpz for pc/Ag electrodes. It was found that /pz 1.2, which was explained by the geometric inhomogeneity of the pc-Ag electrode surface. A more detailed analysis is given in Section II.2. Thus it should be noted that in the case of pc electrodes with appreciable differences of EamQvalues for the various planes (AEff o > 100 mV), it is impossible to obtain the true roughness coefficient, the actual Ea=0, and the inner-layer capacity. 

Electroreflectance data for pc-Cu579 confirm that the capacity minimum at E- -0.2 to -0.3 V (SCE) is due to the oxidation of the electrode surface. According to impedance data,564,565 as for pc-Ag and pc-Au,63 67 74 roughness factor for a pc-Cu electrode is approximately 2, which has been explained by the high surface inhomogeneity of the electrode surface. 

On inhomogeneous surfaces where adsorption obeys the Temkin isotherm, an exponential factor will appear in the kinetic equation ... 

Thus, the recombination theory provided the first theoretical interpretation of the linear relation between polarization and the logarithm of current density that had been established experimentally. It is true, though, that the preexponential factor in Eq. (15.12) [2303(RTI2FI) 0.03 V] is four times smaller than the experimental values of slope b but it has been shown in later work that factors closer to the experimental values can be obtained when an inhomogeneous surface is assumed. 

For a normal (Gaussian) error distribution, the RMSE is by a factor of Jl larger than the mean absolute error, also denoted as mean unsigned error. The error distribution of log Sw prediction methods appears to be somewhat less inhomogeneous than a Gaussian distribution and typically leads to a ratio of RMSE/mean absolute error... 

---