Inhibitor-serine hydrolase interactions

The greatly increased nucleophilicity of the catalytic serine distinguishes it from all other serine residues and makes it an ideal candidate for modification via activity-based probes [58]. Of the electrophilic probe types to profile serine hydrolases, the fluorophosphonate (FP)-based probes are the most extensively used and were first introduced by Cravatt and coworkers [38, 39]. FPs have been well-known inhibitors of serine hydrolases for over 80 years and were first applied as chemical weapons as potent acetylcholine esterase inhibitors. As FPs do not resemble a peptide or ester substrate, they are nonselective towards a particular serine hydrolase, thus allowing the entire family to be profiled. FPs also show minimal cross-reactivity with other classes of hydrolases such as cysteine-, metallo-, and aspartylhydrolases [59]. Furthermore, FP-based probes react only with the active serine hydrolase, and not the inactive zymogen, allowing these probes to interact only with functional species within the proteome [59]. Extensive use of this probe family has demonstrated their remarkable selectivity for serine hydrolases and resulted in the identification of over 100 distinct serine hydrolases... 

The inhibitory and postinhibitory steps in the interaction of an OP compound with a serine hydrolase (E-OH) sueh as NTE or AChE are illustrated in Figure 57.6. The mathe-matieal relationships deseribing the kineties of irreversible inhibition of serine esterases by OP eompounds and post-inhibitory reaetions of the enzyme-inhibitor adduet (eonjugate) summarized here were elegantly set forth in the elassie work by Aldridge and Reiner (1972), and synopses are available in other sourees (Clothier et al, 1981 Main, 1980 Riehardson, 1992). The equations featured below... 

Since MGL is a serine hydrolase, its sensitivity to many of the available serine hydrolase inhibitors has been explored (Table 3). The results support the hypothesis that MGL can be inhibited by compounds that interact with its reactive serine. On the other hand, the potencies of the inhibitors are quite variable in some cases, this likely reflects differences in assay methodology (i.e., substrate concentration, pH, form of the enzyme). However, in a few cases, the same assay conditions revealed very different inhibitory potencies (e.g., compare the platelet and macrophage membrane studies by Di Marzo et al. 1999). In any event, studies of these compounds are not likely to yield selective inhibitors of MGL. All of these compounds are inhibitors of FAAH (see above) and many are also inhibitors of PLA2, diacylglycerol lipase, and acetylcholine esterase, among other hydrolases. By analogy to the development of the URB series of FAAH inhibitors (Kathuria et al. 2003), it is likely that selective inhibitors of MGL will come from other synthetic avenues. 

---