Infinite-finite numbers

Beer s law applies where refractive index, scattering specular reflection at infinite-finite numbers of surfaces all obey the Fresnel formulas. A definite reflectance theory does not exist, as the convolution of an infinite number of integrals would be required to describe all the combined light interaction effects at all surfaces under varying conditions. Thus, Beer s law is often shown to illustrate the properties of NIR spectroscopy for lack of an ideal model. 

There are differences between photons and phonons while the total number of photons in a cavity is infinite, the number of elastic modes m a finite solid is finite and equals 3N if there are N atoms in a three-dimensional solid. Furthennore, an elastic wave has tliree possible polarizations, two transverse and one longimdinal, in contrast to only... 

Choosing a standard GTO basis set means that the wave function is being described by a finite number of functions. This introduces an approximation into the calculation since an infinite number of GTO functions would be needed to describe the wave function exactly. Dilferences in results due to the quality of one basis set versus another are referred to as basis set effects. In order to avoid the problem of basis set effects, some high-accuracy work is done with numeric basis sets. These basis sets describe the electron distribution without using functions with a predefined shape. A typical example of such a basis set might... 

The convergence or divergence of an infinite series is unaffected by the removal of a finite number of finite terms. This is a trivial theorem but useful to remember, especially when using the comparison test to be described in the subsection Tests for Convergence and Divergence. ... 

In developing perturbation theory it was assumed that the solutions to the unpermrbed problem formed a complete set. This is general means that there must be an infinite number of functions, which is impossible in actual calculations. The lowest energy solution to the unperturbed problem is the HF wave function, additional higher energy solutions are excited Slater determinants, analogously to the Cl method. When a finite basis set is employed it is only possible to generate a finite number of excited determinants. The expansion of the many-electron wave function is therefore truncated. 

Although CA are most often assumed to live 011 infinitely large lattices, we can equally well consider lattices that are finite in extent (which is done in practice regardless, since all CA simulations are ultimately restricted by a finite computer memory). If a lattice has N sites, there are clearly a finite number,, of possible global configurations. The global dynamical evolution can then be represented by a finite state transition graph Gc, much like the one considered in the description of an abstract automaton in section 2.1.4. 

The first problem of wavefront sensing should now be readily apparent. In practice we always have a finite number of measurements m, but the number of unknown parameters we need to estimate, a, is infinite. This problem is not unique to wavefront sensing, but typical of a general class of problem known as... 

The problem we face is that we have to estimate a wavefront, which has an infinite number of degrees of freedom, from a finite number of measurements. At first this may seem impossible, but in reality an infinite range of possible solutions describes most practical situations, not just wavefront sensing. The key to solving the problem is that we need to make an assumption about the relative likelihood of the solutions. As an example of how this is done, consider a wavefront sensor which makes a single measurement that is sensitive to only two basis functions. 

The only way to avoid this convergence problem is to terminate the infinite series (equation (G.49)) after a finite number of terms. If we let 2 take on the successive values / + 1, / + 2,..., then we obtain a series of acceptable solutions of the differential equation (G.43)... 

The problem of convergence of the infinite series developed above can be circumvented by stopping the chosen series after a given finite number of terms. To break off the series at the term where n = v, it is sufficient to replace /t by v in Eq. (90) and pose 2v — [Pg.58]

Truncation errors. These errors arise from the substitution of a finite number of steps for an infinite sequence of steps which would yield the exact result. To illustrate this error consider the infinite series for e e =l — x + x /2 — x /6 + ET(x), where ET is the truncation error, ET= (l/24)e exi, 0 < e [Pg.43]

Any finite interpretation is necessarily recursive. There are only a finite number of function letters and predicate letters in P and so for each finite domain D only a finite number of possible assignments of functions from iP to D or eP to 0,1. We can recursively enumerate all finite interpretations. A program must loop if it ever enters the sane statement twice with all values specified alike. If finite domain D of interpretation I has d objects and P has n statements and m variables of any kind, then any execution sequence under I with more than ncP steps must twice enter the same statement with the same specification of all variables and hence must represent an infinite loop. Hence for each input vector a computation (P,I,a) diverges if and only if it fails to halt within ndm steps. So for each finite interpretation we can decide whether P baits for some inputs or all inputs. Thus (5) and (6) are partially decidable. 

Now in fact, all this is also in accord with reality an attempt to use data in which the reference energy becomes so small that the noise brings even a single reading down to zero will cause the computed value corresponding to that reading to become infinite then, averaging that with any finite number of other finite values will still result in an... 

The conclusion from all this is that the variance and therefore the standard deviation attains infinite values when the reference energy is so low that it includes the value zero. However, in a probabilistic way it is still possible to perform computations in this regime and obtain at least some rough idea of how the various quantities involved will change as the reference energy approaches zero after all, real data is obtained with a finite number of readings, each of which is finite, and will give some finite answer what we can do for the rest of this current analysis is perform empirical computations to find out what the expectation for that behavior is we will do that in the next chapter. 

Figure 8 illustrates the performance of a system with three equilibrium stages in the absorber and six in the stripper. The actual steam requirement is 147 moles/mole SO2 (41.3 kg/kg). The use of a finite number of stages increases the steam requirement a factor of 2.5 from the case of infinite stages with a nonlinear equilibrium. 

It is helpful to remember that factors are less than, or equal to, the given number. Multiples start at 0, followed by the number itself, and then all other multiples are greater than the number. There are a finite number of factors, but an infinite number of multiples. To find the greatest common factor, list out all of the factors and find the largest one in common. For the least common multiple, list all of the multiples, starting with the number in question, until you find the first multiple that the numbers have in common. 

A corollary is the question of how many individuals it takes to form a collectivity and to display the collective properties how many molecules of water to have a boiling point, how many atoms to form a metal, how many components to display a phase transition Or, how do boiling point, metallic properties, phase transition etc. depend on and vary with the number of components and the nature of their interac-tion(s) In principle any finite number of components leads to a collective behavior that is only an approximation, however dose it may well be, an asymptotic approach to the true value of a given property for an infinite number of units. 

---