Inferences Regarding Parameters

The marginal posterior density for a n j-parameter subset of 6 is obtained by integrating Eq. (7.5-1) from —oo to oo for the other estimated parameters. The result is 

Equation (7.5-2) is a normal density function, with mode da 

The probability content of the region of positive values of the estimated parameter 6. is 

The interval of highest posterior density with probability content (1 — a) for the estimated parameter Or is 

A common choice is q = 0.05, which gives U[a/2) — 1.96, GREGPLUS computes this interval for each estimated parameter. 

---

For inferences regarding the fixed effect parameters in the model, one common method to assess the significance of the estimates is to use a Z-test in which the parameter estimate (p) is divided by its asymptotic standard error [SE(p)] and compared to a Z-distribution... 

Regarding the issue of multidimensional niuner-ical integration of posterior, the paper employs WinBUGS software to establish the reliability growth model based on a new Dirichlet prior distribution, and solves posterior inference of parameters at the same time keeping enough calculation accuracy. 

A chroaatogreuB provides information regarding the complexity (numlser of components), quantity (peak height or area) and identity (retention par uleter) of the components in a mixture. Of these parameters the certainty of identification based solely on retention is considered very suspect, even for simple mixtures. When the identity can be firmly established the quantitative information from the chromatogram is very good. The reverse situation applies to spectroscopic techniques which provide a rich source of qualitative information from which substance Identity may be inferred with a reasonable degree of certainty. Spectroscopic Instruments have, however, two practical limitations it is often difficult to extract quantitative... 

From the work of O Brien [7] we infer that it should be possible to simulate the EPR spectra of CaO Cu2+ using a single-mode vibronic model, but in doing so the values for the parameters should be regarded as effective quantities. 

Consider now robustness. If the estimators A are computed from independent response variables then, as noted in Section 1, the estimators have equal variances and are usually at least approximately normal. Thus the usual assumptions, that estimators are normally distributed with equal variances, are approximately valid and we say that there is inherent robustness to these assumptions. However, the notion of robust methods of analysis for orthogonal saturated designs refers to something more. When making inferences about any effect A, all of the other effects At (k i) are regarded as nuisance parameters and robust means that the inference procedures work well, even when several of the effects ft are large in absolute value. Lenth s method is robust because the pseudo standard error is based on the median absolute estimate and hence is not affected by a few large absolute effect estimates. The method would still be robust even if one used the initial estimate 6 of op, rather than the adaptive estimator 6L, for the same reason. 

The requirements for validation of CE instrumentation have been described. Although these are broadly similar to the requirements for validation of any instrumentation used in GLP/GMP-compliant laboratories, some aspects are peculiar to CE, especially in regard to OQI PV testing. Those features of a CE instrument which should be tested in an OQ/PV include temperature and voltage stability, detector function and injector precision. These should be directly assessed and not inferred from other measurements dependent upon one or more of these parameters or upon chemistry. It is important that the contributions to the performance of an analysis... 

In the qualitative sense one can arrive at a similar conclusion as above regarding the bed by examining the magnitudes of characteristic dimensionless parameters (Table 27.8). Observe that Sw/h = 0.0005 from water. The Mach number Mao is about 0.14, which means that wave speed in water would be about seven times that in mud, a manifestation of the significant role of mud as an energy dissipater. The very low value (0.002) of r]"/rim, the ratio of loss due to mud elasticity to mud viscosity, corroborates the inference that the muck was more like a fluid than a solid. 

The parameterizations of 7i and 0 can be made based on both classical statistical and Bayesian principles of inference. The major difference between these two is that the Bayesian framework treat parameters as random variables, while the classical statistical regard them as fixed. Probabilities under the Bayesian framework are subjective and express the assessor s degree of belief Bayesian inference follows by assigning prior distribution to n and 0 expressing one s state of knowledge before observing the data. Bayes rule is then applied to update the beliefs into posterior distribution. 

The Bayesian posterior estimator for 0i found from the marginal posterior will be the same as that found from the joint posterior when we arc using the posterior mean as our estimator. For this example, the Bayesian posterior density of 0i found by marginalizing 02 out of the joint posterior density, and the profile likelihood function of 01 turn out to have the same shape. This will not always be the case. For instance, suppose we wanted to do inference on 02, and regarded 0i as the nuisance parameter. 

---