Incompatible polymers, copolymers

Heterogeneous alloys can be formed when graft or block copolymers are combined with a compatible polymer. Alloys of incompatible polymers can be formed if an interfacial agent can be found. 

More extensive roughening of an interface between incompatible polymers can be obtained by use of various types of copolymer, introduced at the interface as putative compatibilisers. The interface may be strengthened, as a result of interdiffusion and roughening on a nanoscale. Many elegant experiments have been done in this area. 

These effects have been found by Creton et al. [79] who laminated sheets of incompatible polymers, PMMA and PPO, and studied the adhesion using a double cantilever beam test to evaluate fracture toughness Fc. For the original laminate Fc was only 2 J/m, but when interface reinforced with increasing amounts of a symmetrical P.M.M.A.-P.S. diblock copolymer of high degree of polymerisation (A > A e), the fracture toughness increased to around 170 J/m, and then fell to a steady value of 70 J/m (Fig. 9). 

Polypropylene block and graft copolymers are efficient blend compatibilizers. These materials allow the formation of alloys, for example, isotactic polypropylene with styrene-acrylonitrile polymer or polyamides, by enhancing the dispersion of incompatible polymers and improving their interfacial adhesion. Polyolefinic materials of such types afford property synergisms such as improved stiffness combined with greater toughness. 

Characterization and control of interfaces in the incompatible polymer blends were reported by Fayt et al. [23]. They used techniques such as electron microscopy, thermal transition analysis, and nonradiative energy transfer (NRET), etc. They have illustrated the exciting potentialities offered by diblock copolymers in high-performance polymer blends. 

Since it involves two incompatible polymers, the mixture is heterogeneous at the beginning, but as block copolymer is formed, it progressively becomes homogeneous. It is remarkable that the reaction is quite fast although it takes place at the interface. 

The heat of fusion AHf (obtained from the area under the DSC melting curve) and percentage crystallinity calculated from AHf is found to be linearly dependent on butadiene content, and independent of the polymer architecture. This is shown in Figure 3. Also, the density of the block copolymers was found to be linearly dependent on butadiene content (see Figure 4). The linear additivity of density (specific volume) has been observed by other workers for incompatible block copolymers of styrene and butadiene indicating that very little change in density from that of pure components has occurred on forming the block copolymers.(32) While the above statement is somewhat plausible, these workers have utilized the small positive deviation from the linear additivity law to estimate the thickness of the boundary in SB block copolymers.(32)... 

Another key point is selective chemical functionalization at one or both ends, or inside the chain (see scheme 2).m Thus, thiolo functions can serve as clips to create contact with metal surfaces or particles. Quantitative end functionalization of the rigid-rod on one end is a key step toward rod-coil copolymer synthesis (see scheme 3),131 and such a covalent coupling of incompatible polymer blocks is relevant for supramolecular organization.141... 

Solid films of our block copolymers and their surface behavior have been examined using a variety of techniques. Block copolymers composed of incompatible polymer blocks are known for mesophase formation as a consequence of the microphase separation of the chains. Our fluorinated block copolymers form a microphase-separated structure with a high degree of order. This can easily be visualized by polarization microscopy and SAXS. 

Covalently connecting two incompatible polymers at their ends leads to a fascinating class of self-assembling materials [1]. Block copolymers constitute a well-studied and well-documented set of nanostructured hybrid materials [2], Many synthetic techniques are available for generating AB diblock, ABA triblock, ABC triblock and even more complicated block architectures [3,4], Furthermore, the thermodynamics governing the self-assembly... 

The formation of graft copolymers leads to the possibility of combining incompatible polymers in such a way that the components may be distributed homogeneously or they are at least firmly fixed to each other at the phase boundaries, for example, with high-impact polystyrene, where the two components, polystyrene, ( 90%) and rubber ( 10%), are combined through... 

Polyolefins are well adapted to the mono-material concept talc-filled polypropylene and LFRT for structural parts, foamed polyethylene and polypropylene for damping, polypropy-lene/EPDM alloys or copolymers for skins. Some other functions need incompatible polymers with specific characteristics such as optical properties. Without claiming to be exhaustive, the other thermoplastic materials are ... 

Note 5 The use of the term "polymer alloy for polymer blend is discouraged, as the former term includes multiphase copolymers but excludes incompatible polymer blends (see Definition 1.3). 

One approach is the use of copolymers. There are a number of variations to this. In some situations, polymer-copolymer combinations are used where the adage the enemy of my enemy is my friend comes into play. Thus, the random copolymer of styrene and acrylonitrile forms a miscible blend with PMMA. The copolymer is composed of nonpolar styrene units and polar acrylonitrile units that are incompatible with one another. These units will blend with PMMA in order to avoid one another. 

In segmented polyurethanes as well as in many other block copolymers incompatible polymer segments are combined. This incompatibility of different CRUs means that block copolymers often form multiphase systems (see TEM-... 

Adhesives and Sealants. Dominated by copolymers, adhesives and sealants remain somewhat of a specialty market. These polymers usually contain high copolymer content and low viscosity, and often require blending with oilier compounds prior to final application. Their uses are numerous, e.g., as seals for bottled drinks, as tie layers between incompatible polymers, or as automotive adhesives... 

Homogeneous alloys have a single glass transition temperature which is determined by the ratio of the components. The physical properties of these alloys are averages based on the composition of the alloy. Heterogeneous alloys can be formed when graft or block copolymers are combined with a compatible polymer. Alloys of incompatible polymers can be formed if an interfacial agent can be found. 

Leibler L (1988) Emulsifying effects of block copolymers in incompatible polymer blends. Makromol Chem, Marcomol Symp 16 1-17... 

The choice of the solvent is important, too. By choosing an appropriate solvent or a special mixture of solvents, a transparent solid resin results. Thus, the phase separation between polyvinyl acetate part and the silicone part of the copolymer, two normally incompatible polymers, can be reduced or even be completely avoided. 

For random copolymers and miscible polymer blends, only a single Tg, which is usually intermediate between the Tg of the corresponding neat homopolymers, is observed. For block copolymers with mutually incompatible blocks, the microdomains formed by the different blocks exhibit different Tg, and for incompatible polymer blends separate Tg values are also observed. 

Figure 5.15. MFC can be obtained from incompatible polymer blends by extrusion and orientation (the fibrillization step) followed by thermal treatment at a temperature between the melting points of the two components at constant strain (the isotropization step). The block copolymers formed during the isotropization (in the case of condensation polymers) play the role of a self-compatibilizer. Prolonged annealing transforms the matrix into a block and thereafter into a random copolymer (a) an MFC on the macro level, (b) an MFC on the micro (molecular) level (Fakirov Evstatiev, 1994).

Because "reaction (1) Is considerably faster than "reaction (2)", only a minor quantity of block copolymer Is formed. The Impact modifier segregates as fine spheres homogeneously distributed In the nylon phase. The block copolymer concentrates at the Interface, acting as an emulsifier for the two Incompatible polymers (2 ). In this polymeric oil In oil emulsion the Interfacial adhesion Is good. 

---