In electrophilic aromatic

These parameters, q. and are two of a number of such parameters whose values are used as indices of reactivity in electrophilic aromatic substitution. " However, they are not completely independent quantities as the following discussion shows. 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

The applicability of the two-parameter equation and the constants devised by Brown to electrophilic aromatic substitutions was tested by plotting values of the partial rate factors for a reaction against the appropriate substituent constants. It was maintained that such comparisons yielded satisfactory linear correlations for the results of many electrophilic substitutions, the slopes of the correlations giving the values of the reaction constants. If the existence of linear free energy relationships in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were not in dispute, the above procedure would suffice, and the precision of the correlation would measure the usefulness of the p+cr+ equation. However, a point at issue was whether the effect of a substituent could be represented by a constant, or whether its nature depended on the specific reaction. To investigate the effect of a particular substituent in different reactions, the values for the various reactions of the logarithms of the partial rate factors for the substituent were plotted against the p+ values of the reactions. This procedure should show more readily whether the effect of a substituent depends on the reaction, in which case deviations from a hnear relationship would occur. It was concluded that any variation in substituent effects was random, and not a function of electron demand by the electrophile. ... 

Nitration in sulphuric acid is a reaction for which the nature and concentrations of the electrophile, the nitronium ion, are well established. In these solutions compounds reacting one or two orders of magnitude faster than benzene do so at the rate of encounter of the aromatic molecules and the nitronium ion ( 2.5). If there were a connection between selectivity and reactivity in electrophilic aromatic substitutions, then electrophiles such as those operating in mercuration and Friedel-Crafts alkylation should be subject to control by encounter at a lower threshold of substrate reactivity than in nitration this does not appear to occur. 

SUBSTITUENT EFFECTS IN ELECTROPHILIC AROMATIC SUBSTITUTION ACTIVATING SUBSTITUENTS... 

Substituent Effects in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Activating Substituents... 

Classification of Substituents in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions... 

Arenium ion (Section 12 2) The carbocation intermediate formed by attack of an electrophile on an aromatic substrate in electrophilic aromatic substitution See cyclohexadienyl cation... 

Cyclohexadienyl cation (Section 12 2) The key intermediate in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions It is repre sented by the general structure... 

Partial rate factor (Section 12 10) In electrophilic aromatic substitution a number that compares the rate of attack at a particular nng carbon with the rate of attack at a single po sition of benzene... 

Resonance effects are the primary influence on orientation and reactivity in electrophilic substitution. The common activating groups in electrophilic aromatic substitution, in approximate order of decreasing effectiveness, are —NR2, —NHR, —NH2, —OH, —OR, —NO, —NHCOR, —OCOR, alkyls, —F, —Cl, —Br, —1, aryls, —CH2COOH, and —CH=CH—COOH. Activating groups are ortho- and para-directing. Mixtures of ortho- and para-isomers are frequently produced the exact proportions are usually a function of steric effects and reaction conditions. 

Reactivity and orientation in electrophilic aromatic substitution can also be related to the concept of hardness (see Section 1.2.3). Ionization potential is a major factor in determining hardness and is also intimately related to the process of (x-complex formation when an electrophile interacts with the n HOMO to form a new a bond. In MO terms, hardness is related to the gap between the LUMO and HOMO, t] = (sujmo %omo)/2- Thus, the harder a reactant ring system is, the more difficult it is for an electrophile to complete rr-bond formation. 

Ipso substitution, in which the electrophile attacks a position already carrying a substituent, is relatively rare in electrophilic aromatic substitution and was not explicitly covered in Section 10.2 in the discussion of substituent effects on reactivity and selectivity Using qualitative MO cOTicepts, discuss the effect of the following types of substituents on the energy of the transition state for ipso substitution. 

These relative rate data per position are experimentally detennined and are known as partial rate factors. They offer a convenient way to express substituent effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. 

Table 12.2 summarizes orientation and rate effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions for a variety of frequently encountered substituents. It is arianged in order of decreasing activating power the most strongly activating substituents are at the top, the most strongly deactivating substituents are at the bottom. The main features of the table can be summarized as follows ... 

Aniline and its derivatives are so reactive in electrophilic aromatic substitution that special strategies are usually necessary to carry out these reactions effectively. This topic is discussed in Section 22.14. 

---