Impact assessments matrix effects

Selecting variables is difficult and yet is crucial to the success of the monitoring exercise. One way is to define valued ecosystem components and construct a matrix of interactions between causes and effects. These interactions are then scored for magnitude and relative importance. Those which show the greatest effects are then considered as monitoring variables. This system is used effectively at present for environmental impact assessment in North America and Europe. At present it can be criticised on the grounds of subjective assessment of importance and magnitude, but there are no methods in which environmental quality determinations such as these can be made more independent. 

The pioneering approach to impact assessment, the Leopold Matrix, was developed by Dr. Luna Leopold and others of the United States Geological Survey [6,10,74-75]. The matrix was designed for the assessment of impacts associated with almost any type of construction project. Its main strength is as a checklist that incorporates qualitative information on cause-and-effect relationships, but it is also useful for commimicating results. 

In a series of reviews [244-246] the models proposed for the assessment of the effect of fillers on the complex of PCM properties are discussed. Analysis of the models shows that, for a fixed filler content, the strength must be higher in compositions with fillers featuring the absolute adhesion to the matrix than in systems with little or no adhesion. The relative elongation and specific impact strength must, on the contrary, go up with the increasing adhesion. 

The results of map generation cannot be expressed effectively with the format available here. However, the State of Oregon utilized the map and matrix techniques in their nonpoint source evaluation and as a basis for designing more intensive survey approaches to assessing the impact of human activity on river quality. In addition to reflecting deposition of sediments, the methods can be applied to transport of pesticides, nutrients and trace elements since many of these substances tend to adsorb to the organic and inorganic fractions of soil. 

USEtox calculates characterization factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity. Assessing the toxicological effects of a chemical emitted into the environment implies a cause-effect chain that links emissions to impacts through three steps environmental fate, exposure, and effects. Linking these steps, a systematic framework for toxic impacts modeling based on matrix algebra was developed to some extent within the OMNIITOX project [10]. USEtox covers two spatial scales, the continental and the global scales. 

A classical strategy makes use of odor thresholds calculated in matrix as similar as possible to the wine subject of the study. This strategy, for instance, demonstrated its usefulness for assessing the importance of wood constituents on wine aroma (Boidron et al. 1988) or for establishing the maximum limits beyond which some odorants exert a negative effect on wine aroma (Chatonnet et al. 1993). However, this strategy is quite limited in scope and can only be applied to those compounds that really play the role of impact compounds and to those cases in which is possible to find wines free from such substances. It is, therefore, very well suited to characterize taints and off-flavors. 

Prospective evaluation of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system in a hospital clinical microbiology laboratory for identification of bacteria and yeasts a bench-by-bench study for assessing the impact on time to identification and cost-effectiveness. /. Clin. Microbiol., 50, 3301-3308. 

---