Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Immiscibility variation with temperatur

The locus of the minima is shown as a dotted curve in Fig. 3.16.1. Any horizontal line within its boundaries represents the composition range over which the mixture is heterogeneous for a fixed value of RT/w. The plot of RT/w versus x obtained from the dotted curve is shown in Fig. 3.16.2. For constant w this figure traces the variation of the immiscibility range with temperature. As T is lowered the two phases approach the pure limiting compositions x - 0 and x - 1, which would be attained, if the system could be equilibrated, at T - 0. [Pg.375]

R. Ratnagiri and C. E. Scott, Effect of Viscosity Variation with Temperature on the Compounding Behavior of Immiscible Blends, Polym. Eng. Sci. 39(9), 1823-1835 (1999). [Pg.304]

Ni and Co are immiscible elements with Ag or Cu. Especially Ag is not miscible with Ni or Co even in liquid state. Therefore, there were no previous attempts to make Raney Ni or Co with dissolved Ag and no studies on their catalytic properties, ffere, we will show an approach to make Raney Ni or Co with Cu or Ag. In the case of Al-Co-Cu system precursor, MA was an effective process to prepare a supersaturated single solid solution as shown in Fig.9 (11). The crystallographic structure after leaching of this specimen showed a broad fee phase and no other phases were observed. To examine the as-leached state, the variation of magnetization was measured with the temperature (12). Figure 10 shows the result. The magnetization... [Pg.161]

Rheological properties of a binary mixture melt in the first case are those of a viscous liquid and are changed with temperature and composition due to variations in the thermodynamic interaction between melt components, that is, due to changing miscibility. In the second case, there is no strong dependence of rheological properties on the interaction between immiscible components and the properties are determined mainly by the rheological characteristics of the dispersion media and the dispersed (liquid or solid) phase. [Pg.502]

As indicated in the literature [4,6], although the (3 peak shows only little variation with the PA/PE ratio, the a peak decreases in temperature for lower PA/PE ratios and a shorter polyamide block length as observed in Figure 10. Such a lowering of the a peak is attributed to an internal plasticization coming from oligoether miscible components inside the polyamide-rich regions. Another possible interpretation could be that, since the immiscible polyamide and polyether components are linked by chemical bonds, the structure and mobility of each block affect the others [15]. [Pg.271]

Solution. We present results of regression obtained in ASPEN Plus with NRTL model. Experimental data comes from Landolt-Bomstein. Fig. 6.21 displays the comparison of data at 1.033 at when both VLE and LLE data have been combined. The accuracy is excellent. Both immiscible region and position of the azeotrope are correctly described. Fig. 6.22 displays at the split temperature of 73.2 C. The characteristic concave shape is reproduced. As before, the variation is sharper at the water-rich zone limit. [Pg.223]

Gas chromatography is primarily an analytical separation technique. However, since the basic process is an equilibration of a solute between two immiscible phases, the chromatographic technique may be used to measure such physical properties as activity coefficients, second virial coefficients of gas mixtures, partition coefficients, adsorption and partition isotherms, and complex formation constants. Other properties which can be measured with less accuracy, from secondary measurements or from temperature variation studies, include surface areas, heats of adsorption, and excess enthalpies and excess entropies of solution. A number of reviews and discussions on these measurements have appeared in the literature. The present work is restricted to a review of activity-coefficient measurements. [Pg.46]

Figure 13.5 shows the variation of melting and crystallization temperatures corresponding to each semicrystalline block within PLLA-6-PCL diblock copolymers as a function of composition [34]. For comparison purposes, solution blends of PCL and PLLA homopoljuners of equivalent molecular weights to those of the diblock copolymers were prepared and their characteristic transition temperatures were also reported in Fig. 13.5. This figure shows that the prepared PLLA and PCL blends are immiscible for the compositions examined as can be gathered by the invariance of the melting points associated with each homopolymer. Instead, the diblock copolymers exhibit signs of miscibility. In particular, the melting temperature of the PLLA block decreases as the content of PCL increases, and in the case of the L32C68 sample, the melting point depression of the PLLA block reaches 11°C. Figure 13.5 shows the variation of melting and crystallization temperatures corresponding to each semicrystalline block within PLLA-6-PCL diblock copolymers as a function of composition [34]. For comparison purposes, solution blends of PCL and PLLA homopoljuners of equivalent molecular weights to those of the diblock copolymers were prepared and their characteristic transition temperatures were also reported in Fig. 13.5. This figure shows that the prepared PLLA and PCL blends are immiscible for the compositions examined as can be gathered by the invariance of the melting points associated with each homopolymer. Instead, the diblock copolymers exhibit signs of miscibility. In particular, the melting temperature of the PLLA block decreases as the content of PCL increases, and in the case of the L32C68 sample, the melting point depression of the PLLA block reaches 11°C.
In smdies of mixed monolayers, examination of a series of compositions is important along with the variation in the temperature. The assignment of miscibility or immiscibility in mixed monolayers using BAM can be subtle. [Pg.626]

Pandey et al. [14] characterized the compatibility of immiscible binary blends of acrylonitrile-co-butadiene rubber (NBR) and ethylene proplylenediene rubber (EPDM) by using ultrasonic interferometry. Variations in the ultrasonic velocity of solution blends at room temperature with respect to the varied blend ratios, as... [Pg.271]


See other pages where Immiscibility variation with temperatur is mentioned: [Pg.280]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.2252]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.362]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.375 ]




SEARCH



Immiscibility

Immiscibility Immiscible

Immiscibility temperature

Immiscible

Temperature variations

Variation with

© 2024 chempedia.info