Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

I-S interaction

The I-I bond distances are varying from 2.79 A, in case of complexes with weak I-S interaction, to 3.08 A, as a result of a strong 1-S interaction. The corresponding I-I bond is subseqnently elongated with respect to the corresponding distance in free I-I in the solid state (2.717 A at 110 K). Bigoli et al. [10] has classified iodine adducts of sulfur donors into three classes, depending on 1-1 bond order (n). When n > 0.6 and d(I-I) < 2.85 A the adduct is type A and when n < 0.4 and d(l-l) > 3.01 A it is type C. Componnds with intermediate values were classified as type B. Thus, compounds (18) and (20) are classified to A type, compounds (19), (21) and (22) to B type, whereas componnd (17) is of C type. [Pg.144]

In the separated local field technique, dipolar I-S interactions are separated from chemical shifts of nucelus S. As dipolar interactions are highly sensitive to internuclear distances, the obvious use of the method is for the determination of molecular structure in the solid state. An example is provided by the work of Hester et al. (411) and Rybaczewski et al. (414) on... [Pg.351]

With the aim of increasing the dimensionality through I S interaction, Imakubo et al. (99) used the IEDT-TTF donor molecule (IEDT-TTF = CxH5S6l, iodoethylenedithiotetrathiafulvalene) (see Scheme 11) derived from EDT-TTF by substituting an iodine for one hydrogen atom on the TTF moiety. Indeed, the crystal structure of (IEDT-TTF)[Pd(dmit)2] reveals T S distances of 3.308(4) A, shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii (4.0 A), indicating strong I S interactions. Due to these I - S interactions, the donor and the Pd(dmit)2 units are almost parallel, which is not the case in the parent (EDT-TTF)2[Pd(dmit)2]2 compound (97, 98). The complex (IEDT-TTF)[Pd(dmit)2] behaves like a metal down to 4.2 K, whereas (EDT-TTF)2[Pd(dmit)2]2 remains metallic at lower temperatures (500 mK) (97). [Pg.415]

SEDOR has certain limitations. The method is less reliable when the I - I interactions are stronger than the I — S interactions, or when strong S - S interactions are present. Therefore, the technique seems to be well suited for the study of catalysis on surfaces where the above limitations are not severe, at least... [Pg.386]

They interpreted the marked effect of the simultaneous addition of carbon and La on the creep life due to the I-S (interstitial-substitutional) interaction, which forms clusters by chemical affinity around dislocations (Monma and Suto 1966). That is, carbon and La (which has a large atomic radius) form clusters with a large apparent size of the solute atmosphere around dislocations, which markedly decrease the moving velocity of dislocations by anchoring them to the atmosphere. Dislocations can move, however, by a process in which the solute atoms migrate with dislocations, and this will be controlled by the diffusion rate of the solute. The diffusion rate of La atoms is considered to be small, especially when they form clusters by the I-S interaction. Further detailed research is required on this diffusion controlled mechanism. [Pg.33]

A part of the relativistic corrections due to a heavy neighboring atom can be approximated by third-order perturbation theory with nonrelativistic functions. The contribution to shielding comes from the cross term involving the spin-orbit coupling, I S interaction, and the external field-orbit interaction. In nonrelativistic terms, the shielding mechanism is that the external field induces an orbital angular momentum on the electrons of the heavy atom (Br or I), this produces a polarization in the electron spin by spin-orbit coupling, and the spin polarization is transferred to the resonant nucleus by a Fermi contact and by a nuclear spin-electron spin dipolar... [Pg.61]

As another example of the use of the SC rules, consider the configuration interaction which occurs between the Is22s2 and Is22p2 i S CSFs in the Be atom. [Pg.284]

A second way of dealing with the relationship between aj and the experimental concentration requires the use of a statistical model. We assume that the system consists of Nj molecules of type 1 and N2 molecules of type 2. In addition, it is assumed that the molecules, while distinguishable, are identical to one another in size and interaction energy. That is, we can replace a molecule of type 1 in the mixture by one of type 2 and both AV and AH are zero for the process. Now we consider the placement of these molecules in the Nj + N2 = N sites of a three-dimensional lattice. The total number of arrangements of the N molecules is given by N , but since interchanging any of the I s or 2 s makes no difference, we divide by the number of ways of doing the latter—Ni and N2 , respectively—to obtain the total number of different ways the system can come about. This is called the thermodynamic probabilty 2 of the system, and we saw in Sec. 3.3 that 2 is the basis for the statistical calculation of entropy. For this specific model... [Pg.511]

The interaction of carbon dioxide with transition metal complexes. I. S. Kolomnikov and M. K. Grigoryan, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 1978,47, 334-353 (306). [Pg.59]

The form of the functions may be closely similar to that of the molecular orbitals used in the simple theory of metals. If there are M interatomic positions in the crystal which might be occupied by any one of the N electron-pair bonds, then the M functions linear aggregates that approximate the solutions of the wave equation with inclusion of the interaction terms representing resonance. This combination can be effected with use of Bloch factors ... [Pg.392]

OIDEP usually results from Tq-S mixing in radical pairs, although T i-S mixing has also been considered (Atkins et al., 1971, 1973). The time development of electron-spin state populations is a function of the electron Zeeman interaction, the electron-nuclear hyperfine interaction, the electron-electron exchange interaction, together with spin-rotational and orientation dependent terms (Pedersen and Freed, 1972). Electron spin lattice relaxation Ti = 10 to 10 sec) is normally slower than the polarizing process. [Pg.121]

Note that, throughout this discussion, we have used lower-case letters when refering to orbitals and upper-case when we mean many-electron wavefunctions. There arises the question of, what are the relationships between I and L, or between s and S . They are determined by the vector coupling rule. This states that the angular momentum for a coupled (i.e. interacting) pair of electrons may take values ranging from their sum to their difference (Eq. 3.11). [Pg.42]

In an effort to understand how actin-actin interactions might be affected by the binding of the myosin head, and in order to gain more insight into the nature of the actin-myosin interface, we have investigated the nature of the kinetic actin-myosin intermediates involved in the process of S)-induced polymerization of G-actin. For this purpose, a variety of fluorescent probes (e.g., pyrene, NBD, AEDANS) have been covalently attached to the C-terminus of G-actin to probe the G-actin-S] interaction under conditions of tightest binding, i.e., in the absence of ATP. [Pg.54]

Cmtzen, P. J. (1988). Tropospheric ozone an overview. In "Tropospheric Ozone-Regional and Global Scale Interactions" (I. S. A. Isaksen, ed.). NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 227. D. Reidel Publ. Co., Boston, MA. [Pg.340]

A schematic molecular orbital diagram for the Fe-Fe interaction in an S = I valence-delocalized Fe Fe pair based on effective C v symmetry at the Fe sites and the observed electronic transitions for the valance-delocalized [Fe2S2l cluster is shown in Fig. 15. The dominant interaction (responsible for the S = ground state) is the a overlap between the pair of orbitals, with progressively smaller tt interactions between pairs of d z and dyz orbitals and S interactions between pairs of d y amd / orbitals. The three highest energy tran-... [Pg.45]

Replacement of gas by the nonpolar (e.g., hydrocarbon) phase (oil phase) has been sometimes used to modify the interactions among molecules in a spread film of long-chain substances. The nonpolar solvent/water interface possesses an advantage over that between gas and water in that cohesion (i.e., interactions between adsorbed molecules) due to dipole and van der Waals s forces is negligible. Thus, at the oil/water interfaces, the behavior of adsorbates is much more ideal, but quantitative interpretation may be uncertain, in particular for the higher chains, which are predominantly dissolved in the oil phase to an unknown extent. The oil phase is poured on the surface of an aqueous solution. Thus, the hydrocarbon, such as heptane or decane, forms a membrane a few millimeters thick. It is thicker than the adsorbed monolayer. Owing to the small difference in dielectric constant between the air and a hydrocarbon oil, the... [Pg.36]

Since the dependence of the i/i o6) ratio on d and the tip geometry can be calculated theoretically [8], simple current measurements with mediators which do not interact at the interface can be used to determine d. When either the solution species of interest, or electrolysis product(s), interact with the target interface, the hindered mass transport picture of Fig. 1(b) is modified. The effect is manifested in a change in the tip current, which is the basis of using SECM to investigate interfacial reactivity. [Pg.291]

Figure 3.22 shows the result of verification of equations (3.28) and (3.29) under conditions of interaction of oxygen adsorbed on ZnO film with molecules of polar and chemically analogous solvents for the same concentration of dissolved oxygen. The values s of these solvents vary from 17 to 81. Experimental points are fairly satisfactorily plotted against the straight line IgB - i/s which is in consistency with the requirements of equations (3.28) and (3.29). [Pg.215]


See other pages where I-S interaction is mentioned: [Pg.502]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.1482]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.924]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.330]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 ]




SEARCH



Covalent S-I Interactions for Mesoporous TM Oxides

S to I Charge Transfer Interactions for Mesoporous TM Oxides

SuperHyperfine Interactions (S.A.I)

© 2024 chempedia.info