Hypothesis rejecting

Consider the hypothesis Ii = [Lo- If, iri fact, the hypothesis is correct, i.e., Ii = [Lo (under the condition Of = o ), then the sampling distribution of x — x is predictable through the t distribution. The obseiwed sample values then can be compared with the corresponding t distribution. If the sample values are reasonably close (as reflectedthrough the Ot level), that is, X andxg are not Too different from each other on the basis of the t distribution, the null hypothesis would be accepted. Conversely, if they deviate from each other too much and the deviation is therefore not ascribable to chance, the conjecture would be questioned and the null hypothesis rejected. 

Real state Accept hypothesis Reject hypothesis... 

Fail to reject null hypothesis Reject null hypothesis... 

The decision to reject the null hypothesis depends on the value of the test statistic relative to the distribution of its values under the null hypothesis. Rejection of the null hypothesis means one of two things ... 

Two kinds of errors may be committed when testing a hypothesis rejecting a hypothesis when it is true, and accepting a hypothesis when it is... 

Alternative hypothesis i.e., null hypothesis rejected at probability determined by decision point... 

Finally, when attempting to adapt their reasoning to the scaffolding-device, peers shift from the problematic inductive pattern to the deductive one, but they do not proceed to the required predictions of those outcomes or to a rejection of the hypothesis. Instead, they remain consistent with their confirmatory context, since they only follow the first steps of proposing a test and predicting its outcomes, while leaving out of focus the critical step of defining the conditions of hypothesis rejection. 

The second hypothesis on the phenomenon of dose compensation was suggested by Goldschmidt. This hypothesis rejected the presence of specific compensatory gene modifiers and explained dose compensation through physiological peculiarities in male development as compared with female development (Goldschmidt, 1961). 

Next, an equation for a test statistic is written, and the test statistic s critical value is found from an appropriate table. This critical value defines the breakpoint between values of the test statistic for which the null hypothesis will be retained or rejected. The test statistic is calculated from the data, compared with the critical value, and the null hypothesis is either rejected or retained. Finally, the result of the significance test is used to answer the original question. 

A statement that the difference between two values is too great to be explained by indeterminate error accepted if the significance test shows that null hypothesis should be rejected (Ha). 

Examples of (a) two-tailed, (b) and (c) one-tailed, significance tests. The shaded areas in each curve represent the values for which the null hypothesis is rejected. 

Significance test in which the null hypothesis is rejected for values at either end of the normal distribution. 

Since significance tests are based on probabilities, their interpretation is naturally subject to error. As we have already seen, significance tests are carried out at a significance level, a, that defines the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is true. For example, when a significance test is conducted at a = 0.05, there is a 5% probability that the null hypothesis will be incorrectly rejected. This is known as a type 1 error, and its risk is always equivalent to a. Type 1 errors in two-tailed and one-tailed significance tests are represented by the shaded areas under the probability distribution curves in Figure 4.10. 

The second type of error occurs when the null hypothesis is retained even though it is false and should be rejected. This is known as a type 2 error, and its probability of occurrence is [3. Unfortunately, in most cases [3 cannot be easily calculated or estimated. 

Relationship between confidence intervals and results of a significance test, (a) The shaded area under the normal distribution curves shows the apparent confidence intervals for the sample based on fexp. The solid bars in (b) and (c) show the actual confidence intervals that can be explained by indeterminate error using the critical value of (a,v). In part (b) the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In part (c) the null hypothesis is retained. 

The critical value for f(0.05,4), as found in Appendix IB, is 2.78. Since fexp is greater than f(0.05, 4), we must reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. At the 95% confidence level the difference between X and p, is significant and cannot be explained by indeterminate sources of error. There is evidence, therefore, that the results are affected by a determinate source of error. 

If evidence for a determinate error is found, as in Example 4.16, its source should be identified and corrected before analyzing additional samples. Failing to reject the null hypothesis, however, does not imply that the method is accurate, but only indicates that there is insufficient evidence to prove the method inaccurate at the stated confidence level. 

Regardless of whether equation 4.19 or 4.20 is used to calculate fexp, the null hypothesis is rejected if fexp is greater than f(a, v), and retained if fexp is less than or equal to f(a, v). 

Since Fgxp is larger than the critical value of 7.15 for F(0.05, 5, 5), the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis that the variances are significantly different is accepted. As a result, a pooled standard deviation cannot be calculated. 

The value of fexp is then compared with a critical value, f(a, v), which is determined by the chosen significance level, a, the degrees of freedom for the sample, V, and whether the significance test is one-tailed or two-tailed. For paired data, the degrees of freedom is - 1. If fexp is greater than f(a, v), then the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. If fexp is less than or equal to f(a, v), then the null hypothesis is retained, and a significant difference has not been demonstrated at the stated significance level. This is known as the paired f-test. 

Because (fexp)AB is greater than f(0.05, 18), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis that the results for analyst B are significantly greater than those for analyst A. Working in the same fashion, it is easy to show that... 

---