Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrolysis reactions, species differences

So far, as in Equation (3.33), the hydrolyses of ATP and other high-energy phosphates have been portrayed as simple processes. The situation in a real biological system is far more complex, owing to the operation of several ionic equilibria. First, ATP, ADP, and the other species in Table 3.3 can exist in several different ionization states that must be accounted for in any quantitative analysis. Second, phosphate compounds bind a variety of divalent and monovalent cations with substantial affinity, and the various metal complexes must also be considered in such analyses. Consideration of these special cases makes the quantitative analysis far more realistic. The importance of these multiple equilibria in group transfer reactions is illustrated for the hydrolysis of ATP, but the principles and methods presented are general and can be applied to any similar hydrolysis reaction. [Pg.77]

The difference in these patterns probably reflects that the hydrate entropies are related simply to the net positive charge on the cationic species (i.e., +2 for Pu022) while the hydrolysis reaction is the result of interaction of a water molecule with the metal atom itself — i.e., Pu in Pu022. If this is a valid explanation, the hydrolysis order indicates that the charge on Pu in Pu022 is actually between +3 and +4 and probably about +3.3. [Pg.220]

In 1992, Paul and Van Alstyne reported on the processes that occur after tissue disruption in different species of the calcified green seaweed Halimeda [56]. After wounding, these algae transform their major secondary metabolite, the his-enoylacetate diterpene halimedatetraacetate (48), into halimedatrial (50) and epihalimedatrial (51). The structural relationship between the educt and the reaction products suggests that the transformation occurs by a combination of solvolysis and hydrolysis reactions as indicated in Scheme 14 [108]. [Pg.201]

Interestingly, there is a marked species difference in the in vitro hydrolysis of carbamazepine 10,11-epoxide, such that the reaction was observed only in liver microsomes from humans but not in liver microsomal or cytosolic preparations from dogs, rabbits, hamsters, rats, or mice [181][196], Thus, carbamazepine appears to be a very poor substrate for EH, in analogy with the simpler analogues 10.129 (X = RN, RCH, or RCH=C). The human enzyme is exceptional in this respect, but not, however, in the steric course of the reaction. The diol formed (10.131, X = H2NCON) is mostly the trans-(10.S, 11. S )-enaniiomer [196], In other words, the product enantioselectivity of the hydration of carbamazepine epoxide catalyzed by human EH is the same as that of di benzol a,oxide catalyzed by rabbit microsomal EH, discussed above. [Pg.664]

Recall in our discussion of routes of biotransformation we considered species differences using malathion as an example. Insects convert this compound to its toxic oxidation product more quickly than they detoxify it by hydrolysis. Humans do the conversions in the opposite priority. However, the insects which might be different from the general population and perform detoxification reactions at a faster rate would survive pesticide application and their "resistant" genes would be selectively passed on to the next generations. [Pg.78]

In fact, the very recent 195Pt NMR results of Bancroft et al. (41) indicate that, in agreement with Miller and House (36c), most likely [cis-Pt(NH3)2Cl(H20)]+ is the predominant species that reacts with biomolecules (at least with DNA). Other Pt amine compounds that are antitumor active have different kinetics of the hydrolysis reactions, and usually react much slower. The second-generation drug CBDCA (Fig. 2) is known to hydrolyze (in a 1 mAf solution) with a half-life at 37°C of a few days (41a) (compared to only 1 hour for cis-Pt). [Pg.180]

Amongst the lipases, the pig pancreatic lipase (PPL), the yeast lipase from Candida cylindracea (rugosa) (CCL), and the bacteria lipases from Pseudomonas fluorescens (cepecia) (PEL) and other unclassified Pseudomonas species (PSL) have been most widely used. The experimental methods are very straightforward and little different in their execution from conventional chemical reactions. Hydrolysis reactions are conducted on the soluble lipase in buffered aqueous solutions, commonly in the presence of an organic cosolvent. In organic media the enzyme is added as a powder or in an immobilized form and the resulting suspension stirred or (better) shaken at approximately 40 °C. The enzyme is removed by filtration. [Pg.377]

Condensation reactions under acid catalysed conditions are much slower than hydrolysis reactions and generally start when the hydrolysis process is almost complete. The largest differences in reaction rate constants for hydrolysis and condensation are reported for pH = 0.9 and these differences decrease if the pH is increased [56]. As a consequence a large amount of hydrolysed species is present at the moment condensation becomes significant. Further condensation reactions then take place between individual hydrolysed species (clusters) and lead to aggregated clusters. This is schematically represented for a simple case in Fig. 8.22 where dimers react with each other leading to a linear molecule. Further condensation reactions with other condensed polymers will take place preferentially at the end groups [54]. [Pg.301]

A nucleophilic hydroxide coordinated to one metal ion (terminal coordination) or bridged to both metals (, -hydroxo coordination) is possible both types are present in the X-ray structures. We first consider the possibility that the nucleophile in the reaction is a water molecule coordinated to the Fe + ion of the binuclear metal center. A terminal metal-hydroxo species serving as a nucleophile in an hydrolysis reaction has precedence in model chemistry [62]. The Lewis acidity of the metal, which plays a role by decreasing the pXa of the coordinated water molecule, is more favorable for Fe + than Fe +. The pAaS of water coordinated to aqueous Fe " " and Fe + ate 2.13 and 8.44, respectively, a > 10 -fold difference in acidity [74]. A lower pAa makes it easier to deprotonate to form the hydroxide, the putative nucleophile in the reaction. The loss of activity of Fe -Fe calcineurin upon reduction to the Fe " -Fe + state may therefore reflect the poorer Lewis acidity of Fe + and the requirement for an hydroxide coordinated to the Fe " " ion in the Ml site [35]. [Pg.290]

As with hydrolysis, the relative rates of reaction of different species depend on steric effects and the charge on the transition state. Thus, for acid hydrolysis with a positively charged transition state stabilized by electron-donating groups, (ROjjSiOH condenses faster than (RO)2Si(OH)2, which condenses faster than (RO)Si(OH)3, etc. [Pg.274]

Because of the pronounced differences in the reaction kinetics between reactions (1) and (2), in particular at low solution pH, it seems advisable to look separately at the relative concentrations of the different iodine species present in the equilibrium solution for the cases with iodate formation and without iodate formation . The results of both Bell et al. (1982 a) and of Palmer and Lietzke (1982) on the equilibrium state of the main hydrolysis reactions can be summarized as follows ... [Pg.596]

NMR can be very informative relative to the details of the chemical species produced in solution and on the surfaces. Proton NMR has been used to follow hydrolysis reactions. It is especially easy to follow the alcohol produced. Proton NMR is not as useful in determining the exact nature of the species present during condensation, but silicon-29 NMR is, and it can provide information on the number of different groups attached to the silicon atom. The disadvantage is that the silicon-29 nucleus is not very abimdant (4.7%), and so most of the silicon atoms are not NMR-active. For a model compoimd such as methyltrimethoxysilane, it is possible to identify all the different substituents on the sihcon atoms at the early stages of hydrolysis and condensation. The relative amoimts of the different components were shown to fit to a statistical model for hydrolysis (20). [Pg.7568]


See other pages where Hydrolysis reactions, species differences is mentioned: [Pg.274]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.1784]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.211]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.141 ]




SEARCH



Different species

Hydrolysis reactions

Reaction species

Species differences

© 2024 chempedia.info