Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

HETP of a Packed Absorber

Example 9 HETP of a Packed Absorber McDaniel, Bassyoni, and Holland [Chem. Engng. Sci., 25, 633 (1970)] presented the results of field tests on a packed absorber in a gas plant. The packed section was 23 ft in height, and the column was 3 ft in diameter and filled with 2-in metallic Pall rings. The measured feeds are summarized in the table below. [Pg.45]

As with distillation, the correlation for overall tray efficiency for absorbers, given in Equation 10.7, should only be used to derive a first estimate of the actual number of trays. More elaborate and reliable methods are available, but these require much more information on tray type and geometry and physical properties. If the column is to be packed, then the height of the packing is determined from Equation 9.64. As with distillation, the height equivalent of a theoretical plate (HETP) can vary... [Pg.182]

Equilibrium-stage methods are usually adequate for nearly ideal distillation systems when coupled with calculations of plate efficiency to estimate actual trays or, in the case of packed towers, when HETS (height equivalent of a theoretical stage) or HETP (height equivalent to a theoretical plate) values are known from experience or from experiment to enable the estimation of packed height. For absorbers, strippers, and nonideal distillation systems, mass-transfer models are preferred, but their use requires a value for the tower diameter and a tray layout or type and size of packing. Even when mass-transfer models are preferred, initial calculations are usually made with equilibrium-stage models. Also, note that data for reliable mass-transfer coefficients is often difficult to obtain. [Pg.449]

Next, to determine packed column height use Table 9 for distillation HETP values, leaning tow ards the high side of the range for studies. For use of Kqa values see Section A—Absorbers. Bed height per packed bed runs up to 20-30 ft for metal or ceramic packings, but plastic packing is usually limited to 24 ft. [Pg.85]

Design of inorganic absorbers quite often involves a system whose major parameters are well defined such as system film control, mass transfer coefficient equations, etc. Ludwig gives design data for certain well-known systems sueh as NH3-Air-H20, CI2-H2O, COi in alkaline solutions, etc. Likewise, data for commercially available packings is well documented such as packing factors, HETP, HTU, etc. [Pg.101]

In packed columns, it is conceptually incorrect to use the staged model even though it works if the correct height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) is used. In this chapter we will develop a physically more realistic model for packed columns that is based on mass transfer between the phases. After developing the model for distillation, we will discuss mass transfer correlations that allow us to predict the required coefficients for common packings. Next, we will repeat the analysis for both dilute and concentrated absorbers and strippers and analyze cocurrent absorbers. A simple model for mass transfer on a stage will be developed for distillation, and the estimation of stage efficiency will be considered. After a mass transfer analysis of mixer-setder extractors. Section 16.8 and the appendix to Chapter 16 will develop the rate model for distillation. [Pg.665]


See other pages where HETP of a Packed Absorber is mentioned: [Pg.1435]    [Pg.1432]    [Pg.1435]    [Pg.1432]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.109]   


SEARCH



Absorbance, A

HETP

Packing HETP

© 2024 chempedia.info