Heterogeneous closed system

Phase diagrams show coexistent phases in equilibrium. We have seen in Chapter 1 that the conditions for equilibrium in a heterogeneous closed system at constant pressure and temperature can be expressed in terms of the chemical potential of the components of the phases in equilibrium ... 

Equilibrium between phases in heterogeneous closed systems... 

We return now to a discussion of open systems, which we said were of two types. The first type is simply the various phases in a heterogeneous closed system, consideration of which allowed us to develop the full form of the fundamental equations. The second type consists of a system and an environment, connected by a membrane or membranes permeable to selected constituents of the system. The system is thus open to its environment because certain constituents can enter or leave the system, and these constituents can have their activities controlled by the environment rather than by the system. This arrangement has obvious geological applications in metaso-matic and alteration zones, where a fluid is introduced into a rock (the system) from somewhere else (the environment). 

Our interest is in solution kinetics, so we will concern ourselves only with homogeneous reactions, which take place in a single phase. Heterogeneous reactions take place, at least in part, at interfaces between phases.) Further, we will mainly work with closed systems, those in which matter is neither gained nor lost during the period of observation. 

Chemical equilibria with reactants and products that are all in the same phase are called homogeneous equilibria. Equilibria C, D, and E are homogeneous. Equilibria in systems having more than one phase are called heterogeneous equilibria. Equilibrium F is heterogeneous so too is the equilibrium between water vapor and liquid water in a closed system ... 

As mentioned earlier, a great deal of literature has dealt with the properties of heterogeneous liquid systems such as microemulsions, micelles, vesicles, and lipid bilayers in photosynthetic processes [114,115,119]. At externally polarizable ITIES, the control on the Galvani potential difference offers an extra variable, which allows tuning reaction paths and rates. For instance, the rather high interfacial reactivity of photoexcited porphyrin species has proved to be able to promote processes such as the one shown in Fig. 3(b). The inhibition of back ET upon addition of hexacyanoferrate in the photoreaction of Fig. 17 is an example of a photosynthetic reaction at polarizable ITIES [87,166]. At Galvani potential differences close to 0 V, a direct redox reaction involving an equimolar ratio of the hexacyanoferrate couple and TCNQ features an uphill ET of approximately 0.10 eV (see Fig. 4). However, the excited state of the porphyrin heterodimer can readily inject an electron into TCNQ and subsequently receive an electron from ferrocyanide. For illumination at 543 nm (2.3 eV), the overall photoprocess corresponds to a 4% conversion efficiency. 

Figure 1.1 Scaling the sample relative to an arbitrary heterogeneity. Here, the rock is assumed to have a characteristic exchange distance 8. Atoms in the outer shell (stippled) may have moved in or out inside all the movements kept the system closed. The size of a rock sample will be scaled for a closed system by minimizing the relative proportion of the shell and will be large. For an open system, it will be taken smaller than 8.

In heterogeneous equilibria, not all the species present are in the same state. An example of a heterogeneous equilibrium reaction is heating calcium carbonate in a closed system so that the carbon dioxide gas produced cannot escape and equilibrium is established. The equation for the reaction is ... 

Following Shaw (1970), we can distinguish two types of melting of a heterogeneous solid in a closed system ... 

Recently, heterogeneous catalytic systems were described41 that employ molecular oxygen for the liquid phase oxidative cleavage of vicinal diols. Although the catalysts appear to be mixed metal oxides rather than supported metals the method resembles closely the noble metal-catalyzed oxidations described above, hence their inclusion in this section. 

In many problems of thermodynamics we are concerned with both open and closed systems simultaneously. As an example we may consider a heterogenous system composed of several phases. The whole system is closed. However, we can consider each phase as a system, and these phases are open because material can be transferred from one phase to another. 

Hydrogeochemical reactions involving only a single phase are called homogeneous, whereas heterogeneous reactions occur between two or more phases such as gas and water, water and solids, or gas and solids. In contrast to open systems, closed systems can only exchange energy, not constituents, with the environment. 

For the reactions considered in the previous chapter the adjustment of the thermodynamic equilibrium, as the most stable time-independent form of a closed system, was always assumed. To what extent or in which time this equilibrium is reached can not be described by thermodynamic laws. Thus, slow reversible, irreversible or heterogeneous reactions actually require the consideration of kinetics, i.e. of the rate at which a reaction occurs or the equilibrium adjusts. 

Transport problems in discontinuous (heterogeneous) system discuss the flows of the substance, heat, and electrical energy between two parts of the same system. These parts or phases are uniform and homogeneous. The two parts make up a closed system, although each individual part is an open system, and a substance can be transported from one part to another. There is no chemical reaction taking place in any part. Each part may contain n number of substances. For example, thermal diffusion in a discontinuous system is usually called thermal osmosis. If the parts are in different states of matter, there will be a natural interface. However, if both parts are in liquid or gas phases, then the parts are separated by a porous wall or a semi-permeable membrane. 

Thus far, the discussion of reaction rate has been confined to homogeneous reactions taking place in a closed system of uniform composition, temperature, and pressure. However, many reactions are heterogeneous they occur at the interface between phases, for example, the interface between two fluid phases (gas-liquid, liquid-liquid), the interface between a fluid and solid phase, and the interface between two solid phases. In order to obtain a convenient, specific rate of reaction it is necessary to normalize the reaction rate by the interfacial surface area available for the reaction. The interfacial area must be of uniform composition, temperature, and pressure. Frequently, the interfacial area is not known and alternative definitions of the specific rate are useful. Some examples of these types of rates are ... 

Note that these closed-system considerations do not require assumptions regarding the size of the reservoir. While models have assumed that it constimtes the entire mantle below 670 km (e.g., Allegre et ai, 1986), it can involve a portion of a stratified mantle or material that is distributed as heterogeneities within another mantle reservoir. However, a large deep-mantle reservoir is compatible with the K-" °Ar budget and heat- He balance. 

Irreversible processes of phase transfer and chemical reaction within a closed system, whether homogeneous (a single phase) or heterogeneous (more than one phase), lead to T djS > 0. At equilibrium, T djS = 0. For fixed S and V constraints, dE = —T djS. A reversible process corresponds to zero internal entropy change and a minimum in dE. 

Buffering of pH of natural waters is not caused solely by the C02-HC03 -C03 equilibrium. Heterogeneous equilibria are the most efficient buffer systems of natural waters. In Section 3.9 the pH buffer intensity, 3q, was defined for the incremental addition of C, to a closed system of constant Cj at equilibrium... 

In one field, although restricted, there is a reasonably close analogy between the reactivity of olefins under reducing conditions in both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic systems. We now turn our attention to possible explanations of the observed anomalies and to the causes of the different behaviors shown by the two systems in oxidation and polymerization. 

---