Heterogeneous catalysis types

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... 

Diffusivity and tortuosity affect resistance to diffusion caused by collision with other molecules (bulk diffusion) or by collision with the walls of the pore (Knudsen diffusion). Actual diffusivity in common porous catalysts is intermediate between the two types. Measurements and correlations of diffusivities of both types are Known. Diffusion is expressed per unit cross section and unit thickness of the pellet. Diffusion rate through the pellet then depends on the porosity d and a tortuosity faclor 1 that accounts for increased resistance of crooked and varied-diameter pores. Effective diffusion coefficient is D ff = Empirical porosities range from 0.3 to 0.7, tortuosities from 2 to 7. In the absence of other information, Satterfield Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, McGraw-HiU, 1991) recommends taking d = 0.5 and T = 4. In this area, clearly, precision is not a feature. 

This type of co-catalytic influence is well loiown in heterogeneous catalysis, in which for some reactions an acidic support will activate a metal catalyst more efficiently than a neutral support. In this respect, the acidic ionic liquid can be considered as a liquid acidic support for the transition metal catalysts dissolved in it. 

Normally in heterogeneous catalysis compensation effect behaviour is obtained either for the same reaction upon using differently prepared catalysts of the same type, or with the same catalyst upon using a homologous set of reactants. In the case of electrochemical promotion (Figs. 4.38 and 4.39) one has the same catalyst and the same reaction but various potentials, i.e. various amounts of promoter on the catalyst surface. 

The fourth type was not detected in homogeneous kinetics (116) because of the unsuitable statistical treatment used, but it was known in heterogeneous catalysis (4, 5). It is the so called anticompensation, when AH and AS change in the opposite sense. It was supposed that solvent effects particularly can cause such changes (37). 

In this chapter, we Hmit ourselves to the topic of zeolite membranes in catalysis. Many types of membranes exist and each membrane has its specific field where it can be appHed best. Comparing polymeric and inorganic membranes reveals that for harsher conditions and high-temperature applications, inorganic membranes outperform polymeric membranes. In the field of heterogeneous catalYsis, elevated temperatures are quite common and therefore this is a field in which inorganic membranes could find excellent applications. 

In any catalyst selection procedure the first step will be the search for an active phase, be it a. solid or complexes in a. solution. For heterogeneous catalysis the. second step is also deeisive for the success of process development the choice of the optimal particle morphology. The choice of catalyst morphology (size, shape, porous texture, activity distribution, etc.) depends on intrinsic reaction kinetics as well as on diffusion rates of reactants and products. The catalyst cannot be cho.sen independently of the reactor type, because different reactor types place different demands on the catalyst. For instance, fixed-bed reactors require relatively large particles to minimize the pressure drop, while in fluidized-bed reactors relatively small particles must be used. However, an optimal choice is possible within the limits set by the reactor type. 

The hydrogenation of p-unsaturated alcohols is a classical example of competing reaction processes in heterogeneous catalysis. In principle, either isomerization to an enol followed by tautomerization to the ketone can occur, or direct hydrogenation to the saturated alcohol is possible (1). It is fair to state that interest in this type of chemistry is derived from both basic scientific... 

Transition metal NPs dispersed in ILs are recognized as suitable catalyst systems for many reaction types with both typical homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis (see Sections 1.3.1-1.3.5). The most investigated reactions are the hydrogenation of multiple bonds and arenes [1, 5, 12, 13, 43, 44, 54, 80, 89, 92], carbon-carbon cross-... 

A survey of the literature shows that although very different calorimeters or microcalorimeters have been used for measuring heats of adsorption, most of them were of the adiabatic type, only a few were isothermal, and until recently (14, 15), none were typical heat-flow calorimeters. This results probably from the fact that heat-flow calorimetry was developed more recently than isothermal or adiabatic calorimetry (16, 17). We believe, however, from our experience, that heat-flow calorimeters present, for the measurement of heats of adsorption, qualities and advantages which are not met by other calorimeters. Without entering, at this point, upon a discussion of the respective merits of different adsorption calorimeters, let us indicate briefly that heat-flow calorimeters are particularly adapted to the investigation (1) of slow adsorption or reaction processes, (2) at moderate or high temperatures, and (3) on solids which present a poor thermal diffusivity. Heat-flow calorimetry appears thus to allow the study of adsorption or reaction processes which cannot be studied conveniently with the usual adiabatic or pseudoadiabatic, adsorption calorimeters. In this respect, heat-flow calorimetry should be considered, actually, as a new tool in adsorption and heterogeneous catalysis research. 

It is true, however, that many catalytic reactions cannot be studied conveniently, under given conditions, with usual adsorption calorimeters of the isoperibol type, either because the catalyst is a poor heat-conducting material or because the reaction rate is too low. The use of heat-flow calorimeters, as has been shown in the previous sections of this article, does not present such limitations, and for this reason, these calorimeters are particularly suitable not only for the study of adsorption processes but also for more complete investigations of reaction mechanisms at the surface of oxides or oxide-supported metals. The aim of this section is therefore to present a comprehensive picture of the possibilities and limitations of heat-flow calorimetry in heterogeneous catalysis. The use of Calvet microcalorimeters in the study of a particular system (the oxidation of carbon monoxide at the surface of divided nickel oxides) has moreover been reviewed in a recent article of this series (19). 

Of course, other reaction types have been also investigated more recently, such as the Beckmann rearrangement [247,277,278] or ethylbenzene disproportionation [279, 280], just to name a couple. In situ NMR methods are expected to play a vital role in the future science of heterogeneous catalysis. 

The following four types of heterogeneous catalysis in the liquid-phase oxidation of organic compounds were observed. 

---