Head group between

The acid monolayers adsorb via physical forces [30] however, the interactions between the head group and the surface are very strong [29]. While chemisorption controls the SAMs created from alkylthiols or silanes, it is often preceded by a physical adsorption step [42]. This has been shown quantitatively by FTIR for siloxane polymers chemisorbing to alumina illustrated in Fig. XI-2. The fact that irreversible chemisorption is preceded by physical adsorption explains the utility of equilibrium adsorption models for these processes. 

The interest in vesicles as models for cell biomembranes has led to much work on the interactions within and between lipid layers. The primary contributions to vesicle stability and curvature include those familiar to us already, the electrostatic interactions between charged head groups (Chapter V) and the van der Waals interaction between layers (Chapter VI). An additional force due to thermal fluctuations in membranes produces a steric repulsion between membranes known as the Helfrich or undulation interaction. This force has been quantified by Sackmann and co-workers using reflection interference contrast microscopy to monitor vesicles weakly adhering to a solid substrate [78]. Membrane fluctuation forces may influence the interactions between proteins embedded in them [79]. Finally, in balance with these forces, bending elasticity helps determine shape transitions [80], interactions between inclusions [81], aggregation of membrane junctions [82], and unbinding of pinched membranes [83]. Specific interactions between membrane embedded receptors add an additional complication to biomembrane behavior. These have been stud-... 

Fig. 7.23 In simulations of stearic add on a hydrophobic surface hydrogen bonding between the head groups is important in controlling the orientation of the molecules [Kim et al, 1994b],...

Within a series with a fixed hydrophilic head group, detergency increases with increasing carbon chain length, reaches a maximum, and then decreases. This behavior frequentiy reflects a balance between increased surface activity of the monomer and decreased monomer concentration with increased surface activity. Similar effects are seen in surfactants in biological systems. 

The functional reaction center contains two quinone molecules. One of these, Qb (Figure 12.15), is loosely bound and can be lost during purification. The reason for the difference in the strength of binding between Qa and Qb is unknown, but as we will see later, it probably reflects a functional asymmetry in the molecule as a whole. Qa is positioned between the Fe atom and one of the pheophytin molecules (Figure 12.15). The polar-head group is outside the membrane, bound to a loop region, whereas the hydrophobic tail is... 

Amphipathic lipids spontaneously form a variety of structures when added to aqueous solution. All these structures form in ways that minimize contact between the hydrophobic lipid chains and the aqueous milieu. For example, when small amounts of a fatty acid are added to an aqueous solution, a mono-layer is formed at the air-water interface, with the polar head groups in contact with the water surface and the hydrophobic tails in contact with the air (Figure 9.2). Few lipid molecules are found as monomers in solution. 

There are other ways in which the lateral organization (and asymmetry) of lipids in biological membranes can be altered. Eor example, cholesterol can intercalate between the phospholipid fatty acid chains, its polar hydroxyl group associated with the polar head groups. In this manner, patches of cholesterol and phospholipids can form in an otherwise homogeneous sea of pure phospholipid. This lateral asymmetry can in turn affect the function of membrane proteins and enzymes. The lateral distribution of lipids in a membrane can also be affected by proteins in the membrane. Certain integral membrane proteins prefer associations with specific lipids. Proteins may select unsaturated lipid chains over saturated chains or may prefer a specific head group over others. 

The interfacial activity is determined by the sterical properties of the molecule. At the interface the spatial demand A0 of the hydrophobic part of the molecule is higher because of the second chain of the internal sulfonate compared with the terminal sulfonate. Thus, the surface concentration of the surfactant molecules is lower. That means that the hydrocarbon chains are laterally oriented and therefore cover the interface between the solution surface and air more completely. Because the ratio of the spatial demand of the head group to the volume of the alkyl chain governs the radius of the micellar surface, it... 

---