Hartree-Fock theory states

Hartree-Fock theory is very useful for providing initial, first-level predictions for many systems. It is also reasonably good at computing the structures and vibrational frequencies of stable molecules and some transition states. As such, it is a good base-level theory. However, its neglect of electron correlation makes it unsuitable for some purposes. For example, it is insufficient for accurate modeling of the energetics of reactions and bond dissociation. 

Like Hartree-Fock theory, Cl-Singles is an inexpensive method that can be applied to large systems. When paired with a basis set, it also may be used to define excited state model chemistries whose results may be compared across the full range of practical systems. 

Note that the frequency calculation produces many more frequencies than those listed here. We ve matched calculated frequenices to experimental frequencies using symmetry types and analyzing the normal mode displacements. The agreement with experiment is generally good, and follows what might be expected of Hartree-Fock theory in the ground state. ... 

The problem has now become how to solve for the set of molecular orbital expansion coefficients, c. . Hartree-Fock theory takes advantage of the variational principle, which says that for the ground state of any antisymmetric normalized function of the electronic coordinates, which we will denote H, then the expectation value for the energy corresponding to E will always be greater than the energy for the exact wave function ... 

Equilibrium geometries, dissociation energies, and energy separations between electronic states of different spin multiplicities are described substantially better by Mpller-Plesset theory to second or third order than by Hartree-Fock theory. 

Finally, we should note Koopmans theorem (Koopmans, 1934) which provides a physical interpretation of the orbital energies e from equation (1-24) it states that the orbital energy e obtained from Hartree-Fock theory is an approximation of minus the ionization energy associated with the removal of an electron from that particular orbital i. e., 8 = EN - Ey.j = —IE(i). The simple proof of this theorem can be found in any quantum chemistry textbook. 

For most molecules studied, modest Hartree-Fock calculations yield remarkably accurate barriers that allow confident prediction of the lowest energy conformer in the S0 and D0 states. The simplest level of theory that predicts barriers in good agreement with experiment is HF/6-31G for the closed-shell S0 state (Hartree-Fock theory) and UHF/6-31G for the open-shell D0 state (unrestricted Hartree-Fock theory). The 6-31G basis set has double-zeta quality, with split valence plus d-type polarization on heavy atoms. This is quite modest by current standards. Nevertheless, such calculations reproduce experimental barrier heights within 10%. 

DFT has come to the fore in molecular calculations as providing a relatively cheap and effective method for including important correlation effects in the initial and final states. ADFT methods have been used, but by far the most popular approach is that based on Slater s half electron transition state theory [73] and its developments. Unlike Hartree-Fock theory, DFT has no Koopmans theorem that relates the orbital energies to an ionisation potential, instead it has been shown that the orbital energy (e,) is related to the gradient of the total energy E(N) of an N-electron system, with respect to the occupation number of the 2th orbital ( , ) [74],... 

Most semi-empirical models are based on the fundamental equations of Hartree-Fock theory. In the following section, we develop these equations for a molecular system composed of A nuclei and N electrons in the stationary state. Assuming that the atomic nuclei are fixed in space (the Born-Oppenheimer approximation), the electronic wavefunction obeys the time-independent Schrodinger equation ... 

The value of 3 and its dispersion can be theoretically calculated from equation 6, provided a complete set of electron states of the system is known. Such quantum mechanical calculations have been developed based on molecular Hartree-Fock theory including configuration interactions( 1 3). A detailed theoretical analysis of 3 and contributing 1T -electron states has been presented for several important molecular structures. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

An initial equilibrium structure is obtained at the Hartree-Fock (HF) level with the 6-31G(d) basis [47]. Spin-restricted (RHF) theory is used for singlet states and spin-unrestricted Hartree-Fock theory (UHF) for others. The HF/6-31G(d) equilibrium structure is used to calculate harmonic frequencies, which are then scaled by a factor of 0.8929 to take account of known deficiencies at this level [48], These frequencies are used to evaluate the zero-point energy Ezpe and thermal effects. 

Within the theoretical framework of time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory, Suzuki has proposed an initial-value representation for a spin-coherent state propagator [286]. When we adopt a two-level system with quantum Hamiltonian H, this propagator reads... 

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... 

Consequently, we can carry out the BCH expansion to arbitrarily high order without any increase in the complexity of the terms in the effective Hamiltonian. In practice, the expansion is carried out until convergence in a suitable norm of the operator coefficients is achieved, as illustrated in Table I. Rapid convergence is usually observed. Note that through the decomposition (23), the effective Hamiltonian depends on the one- and two-particle density matrices and therefore becomes state specific, much like the Fock operator in Hartree-Fock theory. 

The Hartree-Fock ground state of the F anion is described by orbitals of s Emd of p symmetry. In the first part of this study, attention was restricted to the convergence of the second order many-body perturbation theory component of the correlation energy for stematically constructed even-tempered basis sets of primitive Gaussian-typ>e functions of s and p symmetry. 

We have presented a practical Hartree-Fock theory of atomic and molecular electronic structure for individual electronically excited states that does not involve the use of off-diagonal Lagrange multipliers. An easily implemented method for taking the orthogonality constraints into account (tocia) has been used to impose the orthogonality of the Hartree-Fock excited state wave function of interest to states of lower energy. 

Hartree—Fock Theory. In the lowest electronic state of most stable molecules the n orbitals of lowest energy are all doubly occupied, thus forming a closed shell. If, at least as a first approximation, such an electronic state is described by a single configuration, the wave function for this state can be written as... 

Whereas Si and s2 are true one-electron spin operators, Ky is the exchange integral of electrons and in one-electron states i and j (independent particle picture of Hartree-Fock theory assumed). It should be stressed here that in the original work by Van Vleck (80) in 1932 the integral was denoted as Jy but as it is an exchange integral we write it as Ky in order to be in accordance with the notation in quantum chemistry, where Jy denotes a Coulomb integral. 

---