Hard electron donors

Although the subject of stability of complexes will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 19 it is appropriate to note here some of the general characteristics of the metal-ligand bond. One of the most relevant principles in this consideration is the hard-soft interaction principle. Metal-ligand bonds are acid-base interactions in the Lewis sense, so the principles discussed in Sections 9.6 and 9.8 apply to these interactions. Soft electron donors in which the donor atom is sulfur or phosphorus form more stable complexes with soft metal ions such as Pt2+ or Ag+, or with metal atoms. Hard electron donors such as H20, NH3( or F generally form stable complexes with hard metal ions like Cr3+ or Co3+. 

The O or S atoms in P=0 and P=S groups may act as electron donors although these groups form relatively weak complexes with electron acceptor compounds such as nonpolarizable, more electropositive (ie, hard) acids, including protons (14). Use is made of this property in the recovery of uranium from wet-process phosphoric acid by extractants such as trioctylphosphine oxide [78-50-2] and di(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate [298-07-7]. 

The strength of the complexation is a function of both the donor atom and the metal ion. The solvent medium is also an important factor because solvent molecules that are potential electron donors can compete for the Lewis acid. Qualitative predictions about the strength of donor-acceptor complexation can be made on the basis of the hard-soft-acid-base concept (see Section 1.2.3). The better matched the donor and acceptor, the stronger is the complexation. Scheme 4.3 gives an ordering of hardness and softness for some neutral and ionic Lewis acids and bases. 

Ahrland et al. (1958) classified a number of Lewis acids as of (a) or (b) type based on the relative affinities for various ions of the ligand atoms. The sequence of stability of complexes is different for classes (a) and (b). With acceptor metal ions of class (a), the affinities of the halide ions lie in the sequence F > Cl > Br > I , whereas with class (b), the sequence is F < Cl" < Br < I . Pearson (1963, 1968) classified acids and bases as hard (class (a)), soft (class (b)) and borderline (Table 1.23). Class (a) acids prefer to link with hard bases, whereas class (b) acids prefer soft bases. Yamada and Tanaka (1975) proposed a softness parameter of metal ions, on the basis of the parameters En (electron donor constant) and H (basicity constant) given by Edwards (1954) (Table 1.24). The softness parameter a is given by a/ a - - P), where a and p are constants characteristic of metal ions. 

Here, the t-Bu+ carbocation is a hard acid, so the product is determined by its interaction with the oxygen (harder) electron donor. With CH3I, the product is nitromethane, showing the softer character of the methyl group. 

Earlier it was described how PH3 is a much weaker base than NH3. That is certainly true when the interaction of these molecules with H+ is considered. However, if the electron pair acceptor is Pt2+, the situation is quite different. In this case, the Pt2+ ion is large and has a low charge, so it is considered to be a soft (polarizable) Lewis acid. Interaction between Pt2+ and PH3 provides a more stable bond that when NH3 bonds to Pt2+. In other words, the soft electron acceptor, Pt2+, bonds better to the softer electron donor, PH3, than it does to NH3. The hard-soft interaction principle does not say that soft Lewis acids will not interact with hard Lewis bases. In fact, they will interact, but this is not the most favored type of interaction. 

The behavior of 3 toward ether or amines on the one hand and toward phosphines, carbon monoxide, and COD on the other (Scheme 2), can be qualitatively explained on the basis of the HSAB concept4 (58). The decomposition of 3 by ethers or amines is then seen as the displacement of the halide anion as a weak hard base from its acid-base complex (3). On the other hand, CO, PR3, and olefins are soft bases and do not decompose (3) instead, complexation to the nickel atom occurs. The behavior of complexes 3 and 4 toward different kinds of electron donors explains in part why they are highly active as catalysts for the oligomerization of olefins in contrast to the dimeric ir-allylnickel halides (1) which show low catalytic activity. One of the functions of the Lewis acid is to remove charge from the nickel, thereby increasing the affinity of the nickel atom for soft donors such as CO, PR3, etc., and for substrate olefin molecules. A second possibility, an increase in reactivity of the nickel-carbon and nickel-hydrogen bonds toward complexed olefins, has as yet found no direct experimental support. 

The principle of hard and soft Lewis acids and bases, proposed by Pearson (1963), is useful to describe these reactions. A Lewis acid is any chemical species that employs an empty electronic orbital available for reaction, while a Lewis base is any chemical species that employs a doubly occupied electronic orbital in a reaction. Lewis acids and bases can be neutral molecules, simple or complex ions, or neutral or charged macromolecules. The proton and all metal cations of interest in subsurface aqueous solutions are Lewis acids. Lewis bases include H, O, oxyanions, and organic N, S, and P electron donors. A list of selected hard and soft Lewis acids and bases found in soil solutions is presented in Table 6.1. 

Pearson35,36 and Parr and co-workers366 c developed the principle of maximum hardness, which states that reacting molecules will arrange their electrons so as to be as hard as possible. Chemical equilibrium, then, is the state of maximum hardness. Soft donors prefer soft acceptors because both partners can increase their hardness by reacting with one another—the shared electrons flow to become less polarizable. To implement this theory quantitatively, Pearson et al. introduced scales of absolute hardness rj and its reciprocal, softness a ... 

Clearly different ligand types will favor different oxidation states. Higher oxidation states prefer hard acid donor atoms, generally first-row p-block elements, rich in electron density and capable of strong a donation. A further provision is that they should resist oxidation. Common donor chromophores which have been used are amines N, imides (including oximes and imines)I>N , oxides —0 and fluorides F-. Second- and third-row p-block donors have also been used, forming bonds which are more covalent in character and creating special problems, as discussed below. 

Neutral extracting agents possessing oxygen-donor atoms (hard bases) in their structure easily coordinate trivalent lanthanide and actinide cations, but do not discriminate between the two families of elements, because the ion-dipole (or ion-induced dipole type) interactions mostly rely on the charge densities of the electron donor and acceptor atoms. As a result, the similar cation radii of some An(III) and Ln(III) and the constriction of the cation radius along the two series of /elements make An(III)/Ln(III) separation essentially impossible from nitric acid media. They can be separated, however, if soft-donor anions, such as thiocyanates, SCN-, are introduced in the feed (34, 35, 39, 77). 

The idea of hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB) is a development of the concept of Lewis acids and bases, so that acids are electron acceptors and bases are electron donors. 

---