Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hamilton’s test

The problems surrounding Hamilton s test (vide supra), as well as some misconceptions and misuses encountered in the literature, led Rogers to propose an alternative and more reliable method for determining the absolute structure58. A factor >7 is introduced which multiplies the imaginary component Aff of the anomalous scattering terms of the atomic scattering factors of all atoms (equation 11, which replaces equation 9, see Section 4.2.2,1.1), and which is treated as a variable in the least-squares refinement. [Pg.390]

We can confront this model with various alternative hypotheses and use Hamilton s test (4) to determine whether or not any of these is a significant competitor. When the best versions of the alternative hypotheses have been produced by minimising ft (eqn. xxiv) the (ft /ft ) ratio is the statistic which should be used to decide between models P and Q. However,... [Pg.20]

Furthermore, using Hamilton s test, all the differences were significant at the 5% level of probability. Thus it was concluded that for all combinations of other factors, the structure factor set of Yokouchi et al gave the best description of the final model. Further considerations were therefore restricted to this set. [Pg.346]

Abstract. Three independent determinations have been made of the crystalline structure of the a-phase of poly (tetra-methylene terephthalate). The data on which these determinations have been based are used to asses the contributions to the uncertainties of the structural parameters caused by errors in the unit cell parameters, structure factors, and bond parameters. The effects of differences in the model from which refinement is started are also assessed. The major contribution to uncertainty arises from errors in the structure factors (the "R-factor" between structure factor sets from two different laboratories can be greater than 20%) but errors in bond parameters also make a sizeable contribution. Hamilton s test indicates that one of the structure factor sets used in this study is less inaccurate than the other two and using this the best model satisfying all the other data is estimated together with the uncertainties in its parameters. [Pg.348]

The alarm substance (Schreckstoff) has served to test Hamilton s selfish-herd theory. Fourteen dace, Leuciscus leuciscus, were habituated to minnow schreckstoff, until they no longer responded. They were then joined by a single, naive minnow. Upon adding schreckstoff to the water, the single minnow was alarmed while the school was not. The single minnow moved into the school and became surrounded by other fish on all sides (Krause, 1993). Among alarmed fish, it is everybody for himself. ... [Pg.194]

Krause, J. (1993). The effect of schreckstoff on the shoaling behavior of the minnow a test of Hamilton s selfish herd theory. Animal Behaviour 45,1019-1024. [Pg.479]

Dieter, C.D., Hamilton, S.J., Duffy, W.G. and Flake, L.D. (1994) Evaluation of the Microtox test to detect phorate contamination in wetlands, Journal of Freshwater Ecology 9 (4), 271-280. [Pg.43]

Rogers, D. On the application of Hamilton s ratio test to the assignment of absolute configuration and an alternative test. Acta Cryst. A37, 734-741 (1981). [Pg.624]

There are several components to a classical trajectory simulation [1-4]. A potential-energy function F(q) must be formulated. In the past F(q) has been represented by an empirical function with adjustable parameters or an analytic fit to electronic structure theory calculations. In recent work [6] the potential energy and its derivatives dV/dqt have been obtained directly from an electronic structure theory, without an intermediate analytic fit. Hamilton s equations of motion [Eq. (1.1)] are solved numerically and numerous algorithms have been developed and tested for doing this is an efficient and accurate manner [1-4]. When the trajectory is completed, the final values for the momenta and coordinates are transformed into properties that may be compared with experiment, such as product vibrational, rotational, and relative translational energies. [Pg.172]

The random lifetime assumption is perhaps most easily tested by classical trajectory calculations (Bunker, 1962 1964 Bunker and Hase, 1973). Initial momenta and coordinates for the Hamiltonian of an excited molecule can be selected randomly, so that a microcanonical ensemble of states is selected. Solving Hamilton s equations of motion, Eq. (2.9), for an initial condition gives the time required for the system to reach the transition state. If the unimolecular dynamics of the molecule are in accord with RRKM theory, the decomposition probability of the molecule versus time, determined on the basis of many initial conditions, will be exponential with the RRKM rate constant. That is, the decay is proportional to exp[-k( )t]. The observation of such an exponential distribution of lifetimes has been identified as intrinsic RRKM behavior. If a microcanonical ensemble is not maintained during the unimolecular decomposition (i.e., IVR is slower than decomposition), the decomposition probability will be nonexponential, or exponential with a rate constant that differs from that predicted by RRKM theory. The implication of such trajectory studies to experiments and their relationship to quantum dynamics is discussed in detail in chapter 8. [Pg.194]

The simpler Euler-Bernoulli theory which considers zero transverse shear deformation Yxz has also been tested. Using Hamilton s principle the equations of motion of the beam are derived. This model has been used in various investigations of our group (see, among others, Stavroulakis et al. 2005, 2007). Further applications of piezoelectric layers in control can be found in the review article (Irschik 2002). [Pg.168]

Kaye has pointed out that sample cells for the near-infrared region must be many times thicker than those used for conventional (rock-salt region) infrared spectroscopy. Thicknesses of 1, 5, and 10 cm are convenient for most near-infrared work with liquid samples. He recommends the pathlengths shown in Table I for specific applications with liquids in this region. Hamilton s paper on displacement spectrophotometry describes means of using ordinary test tubes in quantitative work. [Pg.250]

Hamilton Anxiety Scale. The Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale was designed to be used in adult patients who already have a diagnosis of anxiety neurosis rather than for making a diagnosis of anxiety in patients who have other problems. The test contains 14 items, each with a five-point scale, and is completed by a physician or psychologist. The test emphasizes the patient s subjective state. The two subscales determined are somatic anxiety and psychic anxiety. [Pg.813]

Mirsalis, J.C., Tyson, C.K., Steinmetz, K.L., Loh, E.K., Hamilton, C.M., Bakke, J.P. Spalding, J.W. (1989) Measnrement of unschednled DNA synthesis and S-phase synthesis in rodent hepatocytes following in vivo treatment testing of 24 eompounds. Environ, mol. Mutag., 14, 155-164... [Pg.191]


See other pages where Hamilton’s test is mentioned: [Pg.302]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.1099]    [Pg.1357]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.1091]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.2144]    [Pg.2636]    [Pg.26]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.337 , Pg.346 ]




SEARCH



Hamilton

© 2024 chempedia.info