Group IIIA elements

In all above mentioned applications, the surface properties of group IIIA elements based solids are of primary importance in governing the thermodynamics of the adsorption, reaction, and desorption steps, which represent the core of a catalytic process. The method often used to clarify the mechanism of catalytic action is to search for correlations between the catalyst activity and selectivity and some other properties of its surface as, for instance, surface composition and surface acidity and basicity [58-60]. Also, since contact catalysis involves the adsorption of at least one of the reactants as a step of the reaction mechanism, the correlation of quantities related to the reactant chemisorption with the catalytic activity is necessary. The magnitude of the bonds between reactants and catalysts is obviously a relevant parameter. It has been quantitatively confirmed that only a fraction of the surface sites is active during catalysis, the more reactive sites being inhibited by strongly adsorbed species and the less reactive sites not allowing the formation of active species [61]. 

In this chapter, a brief summary of studies that made use of calorimetry to characterize compounds comprising group IIIA elements (zeolites, nitrides, and oxides catalysts) was presented. It was demonstrated that adsorption microcalorimetry can be used as an efficient technique to characterize the acid-base strength of different types of materials and to provide information consistent with the catalytic data. 

Anderson, T.A. and Parsons, M.L., ICP emission spectra III the spectra for the group IIIA elements and spectral interferences due to group IIA and IIIA elements, Appl. Spectrosc., 38, 625,1984 Parsons, M.L., Forster, A., and Anderson, D., An Atlas of Spectral Interferences in ICP Spectroscopy, Plenum Press, New York, 1980. 

Synthetic strategies to alkoxide complexes have been covered in full by previous reviews [14]. The silylamide route proved to be an advantageous method of preparation, especially in the case of homoleptic derivatives [15]. The group (IIIA) elements - scandium, yttrium and lanthanum - are considered as lanthanides on the basis of their general chemical similarity to the true lanthanides. 

Generally speaking most of the shallow impurity levels which we shall encounter are based on substitution by an impurity atom for one of the host atoms. An atom must also occupy an interstitial site to be a shallow impurity. In fact, interstitial lithium in silicon has been reported to act as a shallow donor level. All of the impurities associated with shallow impurity levels are not always located at the substitutional sites, but a part of the impurities are at interstitial sites. Indeed, about 90% of group-VA elements and boron implanted into Si almost certainly take up substitutional sites i.e., they replace atoms of the host lattice, but the remaining atoms of 10% are at interstitial sites. About 30% of the implanted atoms of group-IIIA elements except boron are located at either a substitutional site or an interstitial site, and the other 40% atoms exist at unspecified sites in Si [3]. The location of the impurity atoms in the semiconductors substitutional, interstitial, or other site, is a matter of considerable concern to us, because the electric property depends on whether they are at the substitutional, interstitial, or other sites. The number of possible impurity configurations is doubled when we consider even substitutional impurities in a compound semiconductor such as ZnO and gallium arsenide instead of an elemental semiconductor such as Si [4],... 

We have to make a comparison of the donor ionization energies between the experimental and calculated values, at least, for the monovalent substitutional impurities of group-IIIA elements at the host Zn site. It is, however, difficult due to a lack of detailed information of the experimentally obtained energy levels. 

Write names and symbols for (a) the alkali metals, (b) the noble gases, (c) the Group IIIA elements. 

The first ionization energies for the Group IIIA elements (B, Al, Ga, In, Tl) are exceptions to the general horizontal trends. They are lower than those of the IIA elements in the same periods because the IIIA elements have only a single electron in their outermost p orbitals. Less energy is required to remove the first p electron than the second s electron from the outermost shell, because the p orbital is at a higher energy (less stable) than an r orbital within the same shell (w value). 

B. Most covalent compounds of the Group IIIA elements, especially boron, B. The IIIA elements contain only three valence shell electrons, so they often form three covalent bonds when they bond to three other atoms. We therefore use six electrons as the number needed by the IIIA elements in step 2 and in steps 3 and 4 we use only three pairs of electrons for the IIIA elements. 

Theoretically, any species that contains an unshared electron pair could act as a base. In fact, most ions and molecules that contain unshared electron pairs undergo some reactions by sharing their electron pairs. Conversely, many Lewis acids contain only six electrons in the highest occupied energy level of the central element. They react by accepting a share in an additional pair of electrons. These species are said to have an open sextet. Many compounds of the Group IIIA elements are Lewis acids, as illustrated by the reaction of boron trichloride with ammonia, presented earlier. 

Corresponding to the place in the Periodic Table, in Tl-compounds the metal occurs in oxidation states + I and + III. In contrast to the other Group IIIA elements, the monovalent form is more stable than the trivalent. The chemical and physical properties of metallic thallium and thallium compounds are similar to those of adjacent elements, mainly to lead (atomic number 82). 

---