Gravitational invariant

This yields a harmonic relation similar to Eq. (2.35) which, when rg is the Compton radius rc, relates to a gravitational invariant S similar to Hat flne-structure constant a (Table 2.1) ... 

The concept of potential energy in mechanics is one example of a scalar field, defined by a simple number that represents a single function of space and time. Other examples include the displacement of a string or a membrane from equilibrium the density, pressure and temperature of a fluid electromagnetic, electrochemical, gravitational and chemical potentials. All of these fields have the property of invariance under a transformation of space coordinates. The numerical value of the field at a point is the same, no matter how or in what form the coordinates of the point are expressed. 

To obtain the result that describes the invariance in the gravitational case space-time is assumed to be curved as described by a function x(A) at any point z. Since... 

The concept of a gauge field and the notion of gauge invariance originated with a premature suggestion by Weyl [42] how to accommodate electromagnetic variables, in addition to the gravitational field, as geometric features of a differential manifold. 

There are both theoretical and experimental reasons to search for CPT violations. The strong theoretical incentive is that, even though the CPT invariance is required to formulate a quantum field theory consistent with special relativity, it turns out to be difficult to construct a gravitational relativistic quantum field theory of the GUT type with the CPT symmetry maintained. In other words it is difficult to incorporate the CPT invariance in the GUT-type extensions of the Standard Model. 

Note that there are some variations in the literature about the definition of these quantities sometimes the definitions of 4> and 4 are swapped, and their sign is also sometimes different. Here we choose the convention that and 4 are equal in the absence of anisotropic stress (see below), and that is the quantity that appears in the Laplacian term of the 00 part of the Einstein equations (the general relativistic analog of the Poisson equation), thus following the Newtonian convention to note the gravitational potential by. ) It is of course possible to define other scalar gauge invariant quantities. For example one can define... 

Equation (2.11) with variable metric tensor describes the invariance in the gravitational case which is characterized by curved space-time. The summation extends over all values of y, and u, so that the sum consists of 4 x 4 terms, of which 12 are equal in pairs, hence 10 independent functions. The motion of a free material point in this field will take the form of curvilinear non-uniform motion. If the matrix of the metric tensor can be diagonalized it is independent of position and the corresponding geometry is said to be flat, which is the special case of SR. 

In summary, the principle of local invariance in a curved Riemannian manifold leads to the appearance of compensating fields. The electromagnetic field is the compensating field of local phase transformation and the gravitational field is the compensating field of local Lorentz transformations. 

Since ip depends on space-time coordinates, the relative phase factor of ip at two different points would be completely arbitrary and accordingly, a must also be a function of space-time. To preserve invariance it is necessary to compensate the variation of the phase a (a ) by introducing the electromagnetic potentials (T4.5). In similar vein the gravitational field appears as the compensating gauge field under Lorentz invariant local isotopic gauge transformation [150]. 

It only remains to add that Einstein would probably reject the theory of multiple space-time systems which I have been expounding to you. He would interpret his formula in terms of contortions in space-time which alter the invariance theory for measure properties, and of the proper times of each historical route. His mode of statement has the greater mathematical simplicity, and only allows of one law of gravitation, excluding the alternative. But, for myself, I cannot reconcile it with the given facts of our experience as to simultaneity, and spatial arrangement. 

Mass m is an invariant measure of the amount of matter. Weight iv is the force of gravitational attraction between that matter and Earth. 

Robert Dicke (1961) later hit on an interesting rejoinder. As noted, Dirac had taken it to be more than mere coincidence that the Hubble age should happen to have the value A, thus linking it to the other two cosmic features. Dicke showed that this was indeed not a coincidence, but his explanation was quite different from Dirac s. Observers can exist in the universe only after heavy elements have had time to form, and within the maximum lifetime of a massive star. Calculations show that, given the components from which the other two constants are constructed, the Hubble age during the epoch of man, as Dicke called it, would necessarily be of the order of A. The relationship between H and the other two does not therefore indicate an invariant relationship, as Dirac thought, but is a selection effect, a constraint set on the value of Tby the conditions of human observership. Ihere is no reason, then, to make the gravitational constant or the mass of the universe vary. 

This scaling invariance also holds for Newtonian gravity (also an inverse square law force like the Coulomb force) and can be used to transform exact solutions of Newtonian gravity with a constant value of G into new ones in which G varies with time or in which the gravitating masses all vary with time [32],... 

Special relativity asserts that, in the absence of gravitational fields, the speed of light is the same for all observers in free fall, the so-called inertial observers. Let S,S be inertial frames of two such observers the invariance of the speed of light implies that the coordinates of the same event, x in S and x = hx m S, must satisfy s = (x,x) = xf,x/). Since for every pair of vectors x,y. 

Most analytical balances used today are electronic balances. The mechanical single-pan balance is still used, though, and so we will describe its operation. Both types are based on comparison of one weight against another (the electronic one for calibration) and have in common factors such as zero-point drift and air buoyancy. We really deal with masses rather than weights. The weight of an object is the force exerted on it by the gravitational attraction. This force will differ at different locations on Earth. Mass, on the other hand, is the quantity of matter of which the object is composed and is invariant. 

The synthesis of general relativity and quantum theory is embodied in the gauge principle that emerges as a natural feature of projective relativity and explains the unihcation of the electromagnetic and gravitational helds. A brief introduction to the concept of gauge invariance is provided in a second Appendix. 

On the topic of Chemical Cosmology not many concepts are as relevant as gauge invariance - the most direct manifestation of space-time curvature. In an attempt to unify the electromagnetic and gravitational helds the idea of gauge transformation was hrst proposed by Herman Weyl (1920) as a space-time dependent change of scale, S dx, on displacement from point... 

K3 Barometric Equation M = = -4- n Vq UjMs = = -pn Gravitation/physical chemistry Invariable... 

---