Graphitized mesophase carbon fiber

Synthetic carbonaceous materials are widely used in these applications. Several types of synthetic materials (e.g. graphitized mesophase carbon microbeads (MCMB), graphitized milled carbon fiber, and even, initially, hard carbons) became the materials of choice at the time of commercialization of first successful lithium-ion batteries in late 1980s. New trends, mainly driven by cost reduction and need for improved performance, currently shift focus towards application of natural graphite. 

Microstructure Formation in Mesophase Carbon Fibers and Other Graphitic Materials... 

In the previous symposium, we reviewed mesophase mechanisms involved in the formation of petroleum coke ( 2 ). Since 1975, two significant developments have been the use of hot-stage microscopy to observe the dynamic behavior of the carbonaceous mesophase in its fluid state (3-6), and the emergence of carbon fibers spun from mesophase pitch (7-9) as effective competitors in applications in which high elastic modulus or good graphiticity is important. This paper focuses on mesophase carbon fibers as an example of how the plastic mesophase can be manipulated to produce fibers with intense preferred orientations and elastic moduli that approach the theoretical limit for the graphite crystal in the a-direction. 

This paper commences with evidence for lamelliform morphologies in mesophase carbon fiber, summarizes relevant information on disclination structures in the carbonaceous mesophase, and then reviews what we learn of disclination behavior from hot-stage observations and from deformation and carbonization experiments. The results indicate that disclination interactions that occur before the mesophase is fully hardened play an important role in determining the microstructures of mesophase carbon fibers, as well as those of cokes and graphites that form through the carbonaceous mesophase. 

Fibers produced from pitch precursors can be manufactured by heat treating isotropic pitch at 400 to 450°C in an inert environment to transform it into a hquid crystalline state. The pitch is then spun into fibers and allowed to thermoset at 300°C for short periods of time. The fibers are subsequendy carbonized and graphitized at temperatures similar to those used in the manufacture of PAN-based fibers. The isotropic pitch precursor has not proved attractive to industry. However, a process based on anisotropic mesophase pitch (30), in which commercial pitch is spun and polymerized to form the mesophase, which is then melt spun, stabilized in air at about 300°C, carbonized at 1300°C, and graphitized at 3000°C, produces ultrahigh modulus (UHM) carbon fibers. In this process tension is not requited in the stabilization and graphitization stages. 

A relatively new class of high-performance carbon fibers is melt-spun from mesophase pitch, a discotic nematic liquid crystalline material. This variety of carbon fibers is unique in that it can develop extended graphitic crystallinity during carbonization, in contrast to current carbon fibers produced from PAN. 

The properties of mesophase pitch-based carbon fibers can vary significantly with fiber texture. Inspection of the cross-section of a circular mesophase fiber usually shows that the graphitic structure converges toward the center of the fiber. This radial texture develops when flow is fully developed during extrusion through the spinnerette. Endo [48] has shown that this texture of mesophase pitch-based carbon fibers is a direct reflection of their underlying molecular structure. 

Since PAN-based carbon fibers tend to be fibrillar in texture, they are unable to develop any extended graphitic structure. Hence, the modulus of a PAN-based fiber is considerably less than the theoretical value (a limit which is nearly achieved by mesophase fibers), as shown in Fig. 9. On the other hand, most commercial PAN-based fibers exhibit higher tensile strengths than mesophase-based fibers. This can be attributed to the fact that the tensile strength of a brittle material is eontrolled by struetural flaws [58]. Their extended graphitic structure makes mesophase fibers more prone to this type of flaw. The impure nature of the pitch preciusor also contributes to their lower strengths. 

The future remains bright for the use of carbon materials in batteries. In the past several years, several new carbon materials have appeared mesophase pitch fibers, expanded graphite and carbon nanotubes. New electrolyte additives for Li-Ion permit the use of low cost PC based electrolytes with natural graphite anodes. Carbon nanotubes are attractive new materials and it appears that they will be available in quantity in the near future. They have a high ratio of the base plane to edge plain found in HOPG. The ultracapacitor application to deposit an electronically conductive polymer on the surface of a carbon nanotube may be the wave of the future. 

Given the complex process to produce mesophase carbon (graphitized microbeads and fibers), natural graphite can be very competitive in terms of its manufacturing costs [18]. The physical characteristics of certain SLC type materials are extremely close to the characteristics of state-of-the-art MCMB grades. 

Takami N, Satoh A, Hara M, Ohsaki T. Rechargeable Lithium-ion cells using graphitized mesophase -pitch-based carbon fiber anodes. J Electrochem Soc 1995 142 2564-2571. 

---