Gibbs free standard energy proton solvation

Examples of excellent work in the literature, where the authors have taken care in their use of the best experimental value for the Gibbs free energy of solvation of the proton, and made careful use of thermodynamic cycles with attention to standard state issues, and made a good choice of methods for gas-phase and solution-phase calculations are listed here. These include the trimethylaminium ion [123], carboxylic acids [124],... 

It is a serious drawback that it is not possible to determine the transfer activity coefficient of the proton (or of any other single-ion species) directly by thermodynamic methods, because only the values for both the proton and its counterion are obtained. Therefore, approximation methods are used to separate the medium effect on the proton. One is based on the simple sphere-in-continuum model of Born, calculating the electrostatic contribution of the Gibb s free energy of transfer. This approach is clearly too weak, because it does not consider solvation effects. Different ex-trathermodynamic approximation methods, unfortunately, lead not only to different values of the medium effect but also to different signs in some cases. Some examples are given in the following log yH+ for methanol -1-1.7 (standard deviation 0.4) ethanol -1-2.5 (1.8), n-butanol -t-2.3 (2.0), dimethyl sulfoxide -3.6 (2.0), acetonitrile -1-4.3 (1.5), formic acid -1-7.9 (1.7), NH3 -16. From these data, it can be seen that methanol has about the same basicity as water the other alcohols are less basic, as is acetonitrile. Di-... 

---