Geometrical Degrees of Freedom

l CRYSTALLINE INTERFACES AND THEIR GEOMETRICAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM 

Interfaces that involve a crystalline material may be classified in different ways. The broadest system of classification is based on the state of matter abutting the crystal  

1 Further information and references may be found in several references [1-3]. 

Kinetics of Materials. By Robert W. Balluffi, Samuel M. Allen, and W. Craig Carter. 591 Copyright 2005 John Wiley Sons, Inc. 

---

For all but the few smallest clusters, the number of possible structures is virtually unlimited. In order to be able to treat the larger systems, quite restrictive assumptions about their geometry has to be made. For those clusters where well-defined equilibrium structures do exist, these are likely to possess a non-trivial point-group symmetry (in many cases the highest possible symmetry). It therefore seemed justified to focus the study on high-symmetric systems. Symmetry can also be used to simplify the calculation of electronic structure, and reduces the number of geometrical degrees of freedom to be optimized. 

The generalized compliance matrix, combining the system electronic and geometric degrees-of-freedom,... 

The constraint of F = Ft s = O in these derivatives implies that the remaining internal coordinates of the nuclear frame are free to relax the atomic positions until the forces associated with these geometrical degrees-of-freedom vanish, thus marking the minimum of the system energy with respect to Qtys -... 

Nalewajski, R. F. 2000. Coupling relations between molecular electronic and geometrical degrees of freedom in density functional theory and charge sensitivity analysis. Computers Chem. 24 243-257. 

Nalewajski, R. F. 2006b. Probing the interplay between electronic and geometric degrees-of-freedom in molecules and reactive systems. Adv. Quant. Chem. 51 235-305. 

Fig. 2. Energies of the dimethyl disulfide neutral (circles) and cr anion (triangles) as functions of the S-S bond length (A) with all other geometrical degrees of freedom relaxed to minimize the energy.

Semi-empirical methods, such as those outlined in Appendix F, use experimental data or the results of ab initio calculations to determine some of the matrix elements or integrals needed to carry out their procedures. Totally empirical methods attempt to describe the internal electronic energy of a system as a function of geometrical degrees of freedom (e.g., bond lengths and angles) in terms of analytical force fields whose parameters have been determined to fit known experimental data on some class of compounds. Examples of such parameterized force fields were presented in Section III. A of Chapter 16. 

The number of geometrical degrees of freedom is the number of geometrical parameters that must be specified in order to define the interface. 

On the other hand the Ih symmetry imposes no constraint on the lengths of the 6-6 and 6-5 bonds, other than that all 6-6 bonds must be identical and all 6-5 bonds must be identical. There are thus just two geometric degrees of freedom, and both can be represented by stretching force constants just as in planar hydrocarbons. 

In a related issue, the development of reliable, fast, and generally applicable empirical potentials (or other procedures) that will allow examination of large numbers of degrees of freedom in a wide variety of classes of organic compounds remains an important unsolved problem. Just as in the case of neglect of geometric degrees of freedom, the use of naive approximations or potential functions that omit obvious terms of importance cannot be expected to provide reliable results (78). 

R. W. HaU (2005) Simulation of electronic and geometric degrees of freedom using a kink-based path integral formnlation Application to molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 122, p. 164112(1-8]... 

The efficiency of microiterations is well exemplified by test IMQMM calculations on the cis isomers of Pt(P( Bu)3)2(H)2, a system already used earlier and taken from an IMOMM calibration study (23). In this molecule, there are a total of 83 atoms. Therefore, the total number of geometrical degrees of freedom in the system is 243 (83 x 3 coordinates per atom, minus the 6 degrees of freedom corresponding to translation and rotation). If one further subtracts the 6 frozen distances between the connecting atoms, there are a total of 237 variables to be optimized in the calculation. If one uses a standard optimization scheme, with no microiterations, after 99 steps and 144 minutes of computer time the calculation is still far from convergence, with the maximum gradient 10 times above the threshold. 

---