General Setting Boundary-Layer Equations

The boundary-layer equations represent a coupled, nonlinear system of parabolic partial-differential equations. Boundary conditions are required at the channel inlet and at the extremeties of the y domain. (The inlet boundary conditions mathematically play the role of initial conditions, since in these parabolic equations x plays the role of the time-like independent variable.) At the inlet, profiles of the dependent variables (w(y), T(y), and Tt(y)) must be specified. The v(y) profile must also be specified, but as discussed in Section 7.6.1, v(y) cannot be specified independently. When heterogeneous chemistry occurs on a wall the initial species profile Yk (y) must be specified such that the gas-phase composition at the wall is consistent with the surface composition and temperature and the heterogeneous reaction mechanism. The inlet pressure must also be specified. 

Boundary conditions are required for u, T, and Yk at both extremeties of the (cross-flow) y domain for all x. The boundaries may be solid walls or, such as in the case of 

---

While the boundary layer equations that were derived in the preceding sections are much simpler than the general equations from which they were derived, they still form a complex set of simultaneous partial differential equations. Analytical solutions to this set of equations have been obtained in a few important cases. For the majority of flows, however, a numerical solution procedure must be adopted. Such solutions are readily obtained today using modest modem computing facilities. This was, however, not always so. For this reason, approximate solutions to the boundary layer equations have in the past been quite widely used. While such methods of solution are less important today, they are still used to some extent. One such approach will, therefore, be considered in the present text. 

As an alternative to film models, McNamara and Amidon [6] included convection, or mass transfer via fluid flow, into the general solid dissolution and reaction modeling scheme. The idea was to recognize that diffusion was not the only process by which mass could be transferred from the solid surface through the boundary layer [7], McNamara and Amidon constructed a set of steady-state convective diffusion continuity equations such as... 

The general model assumes instantaneous equilibria in the boundary layer of all solution species except C02> It uses a different diffusivity for each species. It accounts for the finite-rate, reversible reaction of CO2 and H2O to give IT " and HCO3- by iterative, numerical integration of a second-order, nonlinear differential equation and a set of nonlinear algebraic equations. 

There are different possibilities to form mixed surfactant layers and respective quantitative theories have to consider the particular initial and boundary conditions. The general description of the adsorption kinetics of a surfactant mixture however can be made in an analogous way as for a single surfactant solution. Instead of Eq. (4.5) a set of transport equations has to be used, one for each of the r different surfactants. The initial and boundary conditions are defined for... 

Next, let us consider the application of Equation (21) to a particle migrating in an electric field. We recall from Chapter 4 that the layer of liquid immediately adjacent to a particle moves with the same velocity as the surface that is, whatever the relative velocity between the particle and the fluid may be some distance from the surface, it is zero at the surface. What is not clear is the actual distance from the surface at which the relative motion sets in between the immobilized layer and the mobile fluid. This boundary is known as the surface of shear. Although the precise location of the surface of shear is not known, it is presumably within a couple of molecular diameters of the actual particle surface for smooth particles. Ideas about adsorption from solution (e.g., Section 7.7) in general and about the Stern layer (Section 11.8) in particular give a molecular interpretation to the stationary layer and lend plausibility to the statement about its thickness. What is most important here is the realization that the surface of shear occurs well within the double layer, probably at a location roughly equivalent to the Stern surface. Rather than identify the Stern surface as the surface of shear, we define the potential at the surface of shear to be the zeta potential f. It is probably fairly close to the... 

In Fig. 2.10, the boundary between the enzyme-containing layer and the transducer has been considered as having either a zero or a finite flux of chemical species. In this respect, amperometric enzyme sensors, which have a finite flux boundary, stand apart from other types of chemical enzymatic sensors. Although the enzyme kinetics are described by the same Michaelis-Menten scheme and by the same set of partial differential equations, the boundary and the initial conditions are different if one or more of the participating species can cross the enzyme layer/transducer boundary. Otherwise, the general diffusion-reaction equations apply to every species in the same manner as discussed in Section 2.3.1. Many amperometric enzyme sensors in the past have been built by adding an enzyme layer to a macroelectrode. However, the microelectrode geometry is preferable because such biosensors reach steady-state operation. 

The solid flow only covers zone D and some mesh elements there are blocked to the solid flow to fit the thickness of iron ore fines layer which are illustrated in Figure 1. Conservation equations of the steady, incompressible solid flow could be defined using the general equation is Eq. (6). In Eq. (6), physical solid velocity is applied. Species of the solid phase include metal iron (Fe), iron oxide (Fc203) and gangue. Terms to represent, T and 5 for the solid flow are listed in Table n. Specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity and viscosity of the solid phase are constant. They are 680 J/(kg K), 0.8 W m/K and 1.0 Pa s respectively. Boundary conditions for solid flow are Sides of the flowing down channels and the perforated plates are considered as non-slip wall conditions for the solid flow and are adiabatic to the solid phase up-surfeces of the solid layers on the perforated plates are considered to be free surfaces at the solid inlet, temperature, volume flow rate and composition of the ore fines are set depending on the simulation case At the solid outlet, a fiilly developed solid flow is assumed. 

One of the most important points to be discussed in this section is the mutual influence of the bulk and the boundary part of the medium confined by the curved interface on their melting behavior. From Equation 9.38 it follows that the shift of the triple point temperature for the sublayers of a curved boundary phase will differ from that for the case of plane interface (as described by Equation 9.22), first fall due to the effect of curvature described by the terms in the second set of brackets (within []). This shift, in turn, affects the values of y l and nl (because of their temperature dependence), which should be substituted into the first set of brackets and the magnitude of the effective latent heat of fusion (see the discussion after Equation 9.36). As a mle, the terms in the first and in the second sets of brackets act in the same direction (while it is not necessary for the general case). This synergetic action makes the sequential phase transitions in boundary sublayers more pronounced and more separated on the temperature scale compared to the case of plane interfaces. Therefore, the phase transitions in deeper boundary sublayers become experimentally detectable. This effect is revealed in most experimental methods as an apparent increase in the thickness of a skin layer (melted layer in the case of premelting) for the curved interfaces [11, 60]. 

---