Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Gaussian methods methods

A different approach is to represent the wavepacket by one or more Gaussian functions. When using a local harmonic approximation to the trae PES, that is, expanding the PES to second-order around the center of the function, the parameters for the Gaussians are found to evolve using classical equations of motion [22-26], Detailed reviews of Gaussian wavepacket methods are found in [27-29]. [Pg.253]

To add non-adiabatic effects to semiclassical methods, it is necessary to allow the trajectories to sample the different surfaces in a way that simulates the population transfer between electronic states. This sampling is most commonly done by using surface hopping techniques or Ehrenfest dynamics. Recent reviews of these methods are found in [30-32]. Gaussian wavepacket methods have also been extended to include non-adiabatic effects [33,34]. Of particular interest here is the spawning method of Martinez, Ben-Nun, and Levine [35,36], which has been used already in a number of direct dynamics studies. [Pg.253]

Finally, Gaussian wavepacket methods are described in which the nuclear wavepacket is described by one or more Gaussian functions. Again the equations of motion to be solved have the fomi of classical trajectories in phase space. Now, however, each trajectory has a quantum character due to its spread in coordinate space. [Pg.258]

The big advantage of the Gaussian wavepacket method over the swarm of trajectory approach is that a wave function is being used, which can be easily manipulated to obtain quantum mechanical information such as the spechum, or reaction cross-sections. The initial Gaussian wave packet is chosen so that it... [Pg.273]

Both the BO dynamics and Gaussian wavepacket methods described above in Section n separate the nuclear and electronic motion at the outset, and use the concept of potential energy surfaces. In what is generally known as the Ehrenfest dynamics method, the picture is still of semiclassical nuclei and quantum mechanical electrons, but in a fundamentally different approach the electronic wave function is propagated at the same time as the pseudoparticles. These are driven by standard classical equations of motion, with the force provided by an instantaneous potential energy function... [Pg.290]

The most important direct solution algorithms used in finite element computations are based on the Gaussian elimination method. [Pg.200]

To describe the basic concept of the Gaussian elimination method we consider the following system of simultaneous algebraic equations... [Pg.200]

The Gaussian elimination method provides a systematic approach for implementation of the described forward reduction and back substitution processes for large systems of algebraic equations. [Pg.200]

SOLUTION ALGORITHMS BASED ON THE GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION METHOD... [Pg.203]

The most frequently used modifications of the basic Gaussian elimination method in finite element analysis are the LU decomposition and frontal solution techniques. [Pg.203]

SOLUTION ALGORITHMS GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION METHOD 205 6.4.2 Frontal solution technique... [Pg.205]

Procedure. Write a program for solving simultaneous equations by the Gaussian elimination method and enter the absorptivity matiix above to solve Eqs. (2-51). Set up and solve the problem resulting from a new set of experimental observations on a new unknown solution leading to the nonhomogeneous veetor b = 0.327,0.810,0.673. ... [Pg.54]

Solve the same two problems with Mathcad. Is there a noticeable difference between the two sets Mathcad uses a variant on the Gaussian substitution method called LU Factorization (Kreyzig, 1988). [Pg.55]

In hybrid DET-Gaussian methods, a Gaussian basis set is used to obtain the best approximation to the three classical or one-election parts of the Schroedinger equation for molecules and DET is used to calculate the election correlation. The Gaussian parts of the calculation are carried out at the restiicted Hartiee-Fock level, for example 6-31G or 6-31 lG(3d,2p), and the DFT part of the calculation is by the B3LYP approximation. Numerous other hybrid methods are currently in use. [Pg.329]

The original paper defining the Gaussian-2 method by Curtiss, Raghavachari, Trucks and Pople tested the method s effectiveness by comparing its results to experimental thermochemical data for a set of 125 calculations 55 atomization energies, 38 ionization potentials, 25 electron affinities and 7 proton affinities. All compounds included only first and second-row heavy atoms. The specific calculations chosen were selected because of the availability of high accuracy experimental values for these thermochemical quantities. [Pg.144]

A variety of compound methods have been developed in an attempt to accurately model the thermochemical quantities we have been considering. These method-s attempt to achieve high accuracy by combining the results of several different calculations as an approximation to a single, very high level computation which is much too expensive to be practical. We will consider two families of methods the Gaussian-n methods and the Complete Basis Set (CBS) methods. [Pg.150]

The net result of all these operations is that in place of the system Ax = h, the system CAx = Ch is obtained, where CA is an upper triangular matrix. Such a matrix is easfiy inverted (the inverse will be exhibited below), and the triangular system is even more easily solved. With this explanation of the gaussian method, the basic theory of this and related methods will now be developed. [Pg.63]

Due to the possible change in retention time and peak profile that may take place during day-to-day operation, it is necessary to measure peak characteristics every day to verify the status of the method validation. A blank sample should be evaluated for an analysis run, where the resolution is determined. For asymmetric peaks, the Gaussian equation cannot be used, so the modified equation, using an exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) method has been proposed [21]. [Pg.249]

Explicitly correlated Gaussians (ECG) methods have already been developed earlier 10,11,12) and have been used for accurate calculations on small molecules. The main difference between these ECG methods and the use of Gaussian geminals in the framework of R12 theory is that in the latter, their purpose is to dampen the linear r term more than being a correlation factor on its own. [Pg.9]


See other pages where Gaussian methods methods is mentioned: [Pg.2215]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 , Pg.164 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 , Pg.164 ]




SEARCH



Cluster applications Gaussian methods

Computational methods Gaussian least-squares method

Density-based methods Gaussian functions

Electronic structure methods Gaussian

Frozen Gaussian propagation method

Gauss-Seidel method Gaussian

Gaussian Geminal Methods

Gaussian deconvolution method

Gaussian elimination method

Gaussian fitting method

Gaussian least-squares method

Gaussian methods

Gaussian methods

Gaussian methods correlated calculations

Gaussian methods quantum dynamics

Gaussian methods solvent dynamic effect

Gaussian very fast multipole methods

Gaussian-n methods

Hartree-Fock method Gaussian orbitals

Hartree-Fock method from Gaussian basis sets

Number of operations in the Gaussian elimination method

Solution algorithms based on the Gaussian elimination method

Statistical methods Gaussian probability

© 2024 chempedia.info