Future-life progression

Surprisingly, Dr. Wambach also found that some hypnotized clients seemed to see their future lives, where they lived in a devastated and depopulated Earth. Over the next few years. Dr. Wambach conducted a study of more than 2,000 people undergoing hypnotic future-life progression. During hypnosis, Wambach offered the participants a choice of three past time periods and two future time periods in which to enter. Of the 2,500 people in the study, six percent reported being alive in 2100 AD, and 13 percent said they were alive in the 2300 AD period. In other words, only a few of the subjects progressed to the future. 

Skeptics would ask why no one has used future-life progression to predict stock values or lottery numbers. Dr. Goldberg says he considers this an unnatural use of our natural psychic abilities and, in any case, the dates are not always accurate. For example, a progression of one week in the future may, in actuality, be three days or ten days hence. Still, that would be good enough to make a killing on Wall Street. 

Frangopol, D., M. Kallen, and J. van Noortwijk (2004). Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating stmctures review and future directions. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 6(4), 197 212. 

Frangopol, D.M, M.J. Kallen J. M. van Noortwijk 2004. Probabilistic Models for Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structures Review and Future Directions. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 6 197-212. 

The final audit report, action plans, progress reports, and any closure report should be retained by the facility based on the facihty record retention pohcy. Typically, these items will be retained until future audit documentation replaces them. In some cases, audit records are retained for the life of the plant. 

Another major hidden problem for the ecosystem s systematic development is a possible local physical disaster, as mentioned earlier. Events such as meteorite strikes and massive volcanic eruptions could cause and have caused considerable disruption in what could be called steady progress, but the general trend on the surface towards oxidation has and will resume after such set-backs due to the very nature of life s reductive chemistry. We turn away from all these considerations of the difficulties we face in any attempt to predict the future to make the statement... 

By April of 1921, the subcommittee s draft report was ready to be circulated to the larger Committee (69). The major revisions that were made in the draft seem to have resulted from Abel s concern that the report contained too much of a one-sided chemical viewpoint, with the medical side often revealing only a superficial acquaintance with the subject. He feared that there were too many positive statements with respect to therapeutics and fundamental problems in the life sciences that medical scientists could object to (70, 71). Abel s criticisms were taken into account, and the revised report was unanimously approved by the full Committee by early August of 1921 (72). The report was published by the Chemical Foundation in late 1921 as "The Future Independence and Progress of American Medicine in the Age of Chemistry" (73). Herty later commented "I put more of my heart into that document than into any piece of work in my life" (74). 

---