Total energy functional

The evaluation to the desired numerical accuracy of the density functional total energy has been a major obstacle to such calculations for many years. Part of the difficulty can be related to truncation errors in the orbital representation, or equivalently to basis set limitations, in variational calculations. Another part of the difficulty can be related to inaccuracies in the solution of Poisson s equation. The problem of maximizing the computational accuracy of the Coulomb self-interaction term in the context of least-squares-fitted auxiliary densities has been addressed in [39]. A third part of the difficulty may arise from the numerical integration, which is unavoidable in calculating the exchange and correlation contributions to the total energy in the density functional framework. 

Dunlap, B. L, Andzehn, J. (1992). Second derivatives of the local-density-functional total energy when the local potential is fitted. Phys. Rev. A 45, 81-86. 

Duiilap, B. I., Andzehn, J., Mintmire, J. W. (1990). Local-density-functional total energy gradients in the linear combination of Gaussian-type orbitals method. Phys. Rev. A 42,6354-6358. 

CALCULATION OF VERTICAL IONIZATION POTENTIALS USING A DENSITY FUNCTIONAL TOTAL-ENERGY DIFFERENCE APPROACH... 

Table 1 Expansion of the Ground State Wave Function for the Hydrogen Atom in a Basis Set of Is Gaussian Functions. Total Energy, , is in hartrees the Basis Set Error, AEbs( ) in millihartrees (Relative to —0.5 hartrees). Data taken from Ref. 68...

Weinert M, Wimmer E and Freeman A J 1982 Total-energy all-electron density functional method for bulk solids and surfaces Phys. Rev. B 26 4571-8... 

Figure 1. Quasiclassical cross-sections for the reaction D -I- H2 (w — 1,2 — 1) DH (v — 1, /) -f H at 1.8-eV total energy as a function of/. The solid line indicates results obtained without including the geometric phase effect. Boxes show the results with the geometric phase included using either 9o = 0 (dashed) or 9o = 11.5 " (dotted).

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. 

Fig. 7. Total energy as a function of setting angle 0. The minimal energy value corresponds to a setting angle of 42.4°.

Th c in pin, th e Ham ilton ian describes th e particles of the system the output, H, is the total energy of the system and the wave function, 4, con stitn tes all we can know ami learn about the particn lar molecular system represented by... 

VV e now wish to establish the general functional form of possible wavefunctions for the two electrons in this pseudo helium atom. We will do so by considering first the spatial part of the u a efunction. We will show how to derive functional forms for the wavefunction in which the i change of electrons is independent of the electron labels and does not affect the electron density. The simplest approach is to assume that each wavefunction for the helium atom is the product of the individual one-electron solutions. As we have just seen, this implies that the total energy is equal to the sum of the one-electron orbital energies, which is not correct as ii ignores electron-electron repulsion. Nevertheless, it is a useful illustrative model. The wavefunction of the lowest energy state then has each of the two electrons in a Is orbital ... 

The canonical ensemble is the name given to an ensemble for constant temperature, number of particles and volume. For our purposes Jf can be considered the same as the total energy, (p r ), which equals the sum of the kinetic energy (jT(p )) of the system, which depends upon the momenta of the particles, and the potential energy (T (r )), which depends upon tlie positions. The factor N arises from the indistinguishability of the particles and the factor is required to ensure that the partition function is equal to the quantum mechanical result for a particle in a box. A short discussion of some of the key results of statistical mechanics is provided in Appendix 6.1 and further details can be found in standard textbooks. 

The pressure often fluctuates much more than quantities such as the total energy in constant NVE molecular dynamics simulation. This is as expected because the pressure related to the virial, which is obtained as the product of the positions and the derivativ of the potential energy function. This product, rijdf rij)/drij, changes more quickly with than does the internal energy, hence the greater fluctuation in the pressure. 

Thomas-Fermi total energy Eg.j.p [p] gives the so-called Thomas-Fermi-Dirac (TFD) energy functional. 

---