Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adiabatic nuclear wave function

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. [Pg.80]

This is the two- (electronically adiabatic-) state approximation. The corresponding equations for the adiabatic nuclear wave functions xad and xadj are... [Pg.428]

If now the nuclear coordinates are regarded as dynamical variables, rather than parameters, then in the vicinity of the intersection point, the energy eigenfunction, which is a combined electronic-nuclear wave function, will contain a superposition of the two adiabatic, superposition states, with nuclear... [Pg.106]

This makes it desirable to define other representations in addition to the electronically adiabatic one [Eqs. (9)-(12)], in which the adiabatic electronic wave function basis set used in the Bom-Huang expansion (12) is replaced by another basis set of functions of the electronic coordinates. Such a different electronic basis set can be chosen so as to minimize the above mentioned gradient term. This term can initially be neglected in the solution of the / -electionic-state nuclear motion Schrodinger equation and reintroduced later using perturbative or other methods, if desired. This new basis set of electronic wave functions can also be made to depend parametrically, like their adiabatic counterparts, on the internal nuclear coordinates q that were defined after Eq. (8). This new electronic basis set is henceforth refened to as diabatic and, as is obvious, leads to an electronically diabatic representation that is not unique unlike the adiabatic one, which is unique by definition. [Pg.188]

U(qJ is referred to as an adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation (ADT) matrix. Its mathematical sbucture is discussed in detail in Section in.C. If the electronic wave functions in the adiabatic and diabatic representations are chosen to be real, as is normally the case, U(q ) is orthogonal and therefore has n n — l)/2 independent elements (or degrees of freedom). This transformation mabix U(qO can be chosen so as to yield a diabatic electronic basis set with desired properties, which can then be used to derive the diabatic nuclear motion Schrodinger equation. By using Eqs. (27) and (28) and the orthonormality of the diabatic and adiabatic electronic basis sets, we can relate the adiabatic and diabatic nuclear wave functions through the same n-dimensional unitary transformation matrix U(qx) according to... [Pg.189]

As discussed in Section II.A, the adiabatic electronic wave functions and depend on the nuclear coordinates Rx only through the subset... [Pg.198]

As shown above in Section UFA, the use of wavepacket dynamics to study non-adiabatic systems is a trivial extension of the methods described for adiabatic systems in Section H E. The equations of motion have the same form, but now there is a wavepacket for each electronic state. The motions of these packets are then coupled by the non-adiabatic terms in the Hamiltonian operator matrix elements. In contrast, the methods in Section II that use trajectories in phase space to represent the time evolution of the nuclear wave function cannot be... [Pg.288]

This means that the electronic and nuclear wave functions cannot be separated anymore, and therefore the adiabatic approximation cannot be applied beyond the second-order perturbation. [Pg.406]

In the Bom-Oppenheimer picture the nuclei move on a potential energy surface (PES) which is a solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation. The PES is independent of the nuclear masses (i.e. it is the same for isotopic molecules), this is not the case when working in the adiabatic approximation since the diagonal correction (and mass polarization) depends on the nuclear masses. Solution of (3.16) for the nuclear wave function leads to energy levels for molecular vibrations (Section 13.1) and rotations, which in turn are the fundamentals for many forms of spectroscopy, such as IR, Raman, microwave etc. [Pg.56]


See other pages where Adiabatic nuclear wave function is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.168]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.73 ]




SEARCH



Wave function adiabatic

© 2024 chempedia.info