Friction heterogeneous

Figure Bl.19.24. Friction loop and topography on a heterogeneous stepped surface. Terraces (2) and (3) are composed of different materials. In regions (1) and (4), the cantilever sticks to the sample surface because of static friction The sliding friction is tj on part (2) and on part 3. In a torsional force image, the contrast difference is caused by the relative sliding friction, Morphological effects may be...

Figure 2-51. Friction factor correlation for slurry flow in heterogeneous flow regime. By permission, Turian, R. M. and Yuan, T. F., Flow of Slurries in Pipelines, A/.Ch.E. Journal, vol. 23, 1977, p. 232-243.

For heterogeneous media composed of solvent and fibers, it was proposed to treat the fiber array as an effective medium, where the hydrodynamic drag is characterized by only one parameter, i.e., Darcy s permeability. This hydrodynamic parameter can be experimentally determined or estimated based upon the structural details of the network [297]. Using Brinkman s equation [49] to compute the drag on a sphere, and combining it with Einstein s equation relating the diffusion and friction coefficients, the following expression was obtained ... 

Such transformations have been extensively studied in quenched steels, but they can also be found in nonferrous alloys, ceramics, minerals, and polymers. They have been studied mainly for technical reasons, since the transformed material often has useful mechanical properties (hard, stiff, high damping (internal friction), shape memory). Martensitic transformations can occur at rather low temperature ( 100 K) where diffusional jumps of atoms are definitely frozen, but also at much higher temperature. Since they occur without transport of matter, they are not of central interest to solid state kinetics. However, in view of the crystallographic as well as the elastic and even plastic implications, diffusionless transformations may inform us about the principles involved in the structural part of heterogeneous solid state reactions, and for this reason we will discuss them. 

Micromechanical experiments made so far can be roughly divided into two parts (i) design of special techniques to measure and evaluate separately different contributions in the net force, such as adhesion, friction, deformation, and (ii) imaging of various heterogeneous surfaces such as blends, composites and microphase separated structures by conventional SFM s to collect statistical information and understand the origin of the mechanical contrast. Many of the micromechanical experiments were discussed elsewhere [58, 67, 68, 381, 412-414]. Here we will focus on recent advances in analytical applications of the active probe SFM. 

Because of the availability of these new methods, devices, and purer materials, it has become more feasible to carry on effective research with adequate surface-chemical control of gas and liquid adsorption, wetting, adhesion, emulsification, foaming, boundary friction, corrosion inhibition, heterogeneous catalysis, electrophoresis, electrode surface potentials, and a variety of other subjects of interest in the surface-chemical and allied fields of research. In view of the present situation, serious investigators should now be able to report results in the scientific literature which will have much more value than ever before. There is no excuse for any investigator s taking such inadequate care in controlling surface composition or surface-active contaminants as was common in over 50% of the research publications in surface and colloid science in the past. 

Hydrodynamic theory [67], based on Stokes-Einstein equation, postulates that solute is represented by a very large sphere in comparison with the surrounding small liquid phase molecules. Solute mobility, and thus its diffusion coefficient, depends on the frictional drag exerted by liquid phase molecules. For heterogeneous gels (rigid polymeric chains), Cukier [85] suggests... 

Methods for the determination of the frictional pressure drop usually start with simple models. For the most part, either homogeneous flow (homogeneous distribution of the phases s — 1) or heterogeneous flow (heterogeneous distribution of the phases, s > 1) are presumed. Less common are methods based upon specific flow patterns and are only applicable if this flow pattern is present. 

In flows with a high proportion of small bubbles, x — 0, in spray or drop flow, x —> 1, or in flows with small density differences, like those near the critical state, the frictional pressure drop can be well represented by the homogeneous model. The heterogeneous model delivers inaccurate results for these conditions. 

---