Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fracture toughness analysis

Yilmaz, S., Kodal, M., Yilmaz, T., and Ozkoc, G. (2014) Fracture toughness analysis of O-POSS/PLA composites... [Pg.338]

In addition to chemical analysis a number of physical and mechanical properties are employed to determine cemented carbide quaUty. Standard test methods employed by the iadustry for abrasive wear resistance, apparent grain size, apparent porosity, coercive force, compressive strength, density, fracture toughness, hardness, linear thermal expansion, magnetic permeabiUty, microstmcture, Poisson s ratio, transverse mpture strength, and Young s modulus are set forth by ASTM/ANSI and the ISO. [Pg.444]

If we take the nominal fracture toughness of IG-11 graphite to be 1 MPayin and the maximum stress in the process zone to be = 60.2 MPa according to the above analysis, we find that rj, = 88 pm. This value is virtually identical to r<, , = 90pm, the process zone dimension determined using Eq. 3. To summarize, the above analysis strongly supports a hypothesis that the maximum critical stress... [Pg.513]

The first detailed book to describe the practice and theory of stereology was assembled by two Americans, DeHoff and Rhines (1968) both these men were famous practitioners in their day. There has been a steady stream of books since then a fine, concise and very clear overview is that by Exner (1996). In the last few years, a specialised form of microstructural analysis, entirely dependent on computerised image analysis, has emerged - fractal analysis, a form of measurement of roughness in two or three dimensions. Most of the voluminous literature of fractals, initiated by a mathematician, Benoit Mandelbrot at IBM, is irrelevant to materials science, but there is a sub-parepisteme of fractal analysis which relates the fractal dimension to fracture toughness one example of this has been analysed, together with an explanation of the meaning of fractal dimension , by Cahn (1989). [Pg.204]

Wallin, Kim. Master curve analysis of ductile to brittle transition region fracture toughness round robin data. The EURO fiacture toughness curve. 1998. 58 p. [Pg.132]

Ceramic-matrix fiber composites, 26 775 Ceramics mechanical properties, 5 613-638 cyclic fatigue, 5 633-634 elastic behavior, 5 613-615 fracture analysis, 5 634-635 fracture toughness, 5 619-623 hardness, 5 626-628 impact and erosion, 5 630 plasticity, 5 623-626 strength, 5 615-619 subcritical crack growth, 5 628—630 thermal stress and thermal shock, 5 632-633... [Pg.159]

To complete the analysis of the fracture toughness the values of and Ic calculated from the maximum load and the energy for crack initiation are summarized in Fig. 52. It becomes obvious that the brittle-ductile transition, which... [Pg.232]

The interface debond criterion used in this analysis is based on the concept of fracture mechanics where the strain energy release rate against the incremental debond length is equated to the interface fracture toughness, Gk, which is considered to be a material constant... [Pg.104]

Carlsson, L.A. and Aksoy, A. (1991). Analysis of interleaved end-notched flexural specimen for measuring mode II fracture toughness. Int. J. Fracture 52, 66-77. [Pg.360]

An appropriate cure cycle was established based on the results obtained from the thermal analysis and cure rheology studies of the resin and cured BCB bar and dogbone shaped samples were fabricated for testing. Bar shaped specimens had the dimensions of 3.5 x 0.5 X 0.125 and were used to stake compact tension specimens for fracture toughness studies and for dynamic mechanical analysis of a torsion bar. Dogbone shaped specimens for tensile tests had a gauge area of 1 x 0.15 and were approximately 0.040 thick. [Pg.369]

Form groups of three. Each person should select a material from the three categories under consideration for this application (steel, aluminum alloy, and titanium alloy) other than the three listed in Table 8.3 and should perform a similar analysis—that is, calculate or look up yield strength, fracture toughness, critical crack size, number of cycles to failure, and the constants A and m in the Paris equation. Combine your results and compare your answers. Do you obtain a result similar to that in Table 8.3 ... [Pg.827]


See other pages where Fracture toughness analysis is mentioned: [Pg.45]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.403]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.219 ]




SEARCH



Tough

Tough fracture

© 2024 chempedia.info