Forward reactions second-order

Pagenkopf 1978), for which the forward reaction (second-order) rate function is... 

If the forward reaction is pseudo first order and the reverse reaction second order, then, as discussed in Sections 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 in Volume 3, the rate equation may be written as ... 

In the range pH 9-11 the rate of formation of the diester is slow enough at 0 °C to be followed by conventional spectrophotometry. The kinetics are those of a reversible reaction, second-order in the forward direction and first-order in the reverse direction, in agreement with the reaction scheme... 

Forward reaction rate constant for ion exchange, m /mol s. Reverse reaction rate constant for ion exchange, m /mol s. Organic reaction second-order constant, m /mol s. Overall mass transfer coefficient for species i, m/s. 

An excess alcohol makes the forward reaction pseudo-first order whereas reverse reaction second order in the case of com oil (Meher et al., 2006). When com oil is transesterified in a pressiuized batch reactor in the presence of sodium methoxide and methanol, higher conversion can be obtained. Kinetic constants of the stepwise reactions are increased in the direction of the progressing steps of the transesterification (Velazquez 2007). 

The paradigmatical binding reaction (equation (C2.l4.22)) is generally analysed as a second order forward reaction and a first order backward reaction, leading to the following rate law ... 

Much of the language used for empirical rate laws can also be appHed to the differential equations associated with each step of a mechanism. Equation 23b is first order in each of I and C and second order overall. Equation 23a implies that one must consider both the forward reaction and the reverse reaction. The forward reaction is second order overall the reverse reaction is first order in [I. Additional language is used for mechanisms that should never be apphed to empirical rate laws. The second equation is said to describe a bimolecular mechanism. A bimolecular mechanism implies a second-order differential equation however, a second-order empirical rate law does not guarantee a bimolecular mechanism. A mechanism may be bimolecular in one component, for example 2A I. 

Suppose that experiments show that both the forward reaction and the reverse reaction are elementary second-order reactions. Then we would write the following rate laws ... 

An analogous study has been reported of the oxidation of 2-methyl-but-3-yn-ol by Cu(II) chloride in aqueous ammonia to give 2,7-dimethylocta-3,5-diene-2,7-diol. Simple, second-order kinetics were obtained, but a very sharp increase in rate occurred when the pH was increased from 8 to 10. Addition of ammonium ions retarded reaction but Cu(I) was without effect. The reaction mechanism put forward is similar to that given above. 

From Table 5.11, there is very little to choose between the best two models. The best fit is given by a second-order model for the forward and a first-order model for the reverse reaction with ... 

However, there is little to choose between this model and a second-order model for both forward and reverse reactions, b. Now use the kinetic model to size a reactor to produce 10 tons per day of ethyl acetate. First, the conversion at equilibrium needs to be calculated. At equilibrium, the rates of forward and reverse reactions are equal ... 

The forward reaction is third-order (second-order with respect to monomer and first-order with respect to catalyst). The reverse reaction is second-order overall (first-order with respect to both catalyst concentration and dimer). The reaction is catalyzed by tributylphosphine at a concentration of 0.05 moles/liter. 

Fig. 5 Logarithmic plots of rate-equilibrium data for the formation and reaction of ring-substituted 1-phenylethyl carbocations X-[6+] in 50/50 (v/v) trifluoroethanol/water at 25°C (data from Table 2). Correlation of first-order rate constants hoh for the addition of water to X-[6+] (Y) and second-order rate constants ( h)so1v for the microscopic reverse specific-acid-catalyzed cleavage of X-[6]-OH to form X-[6+] ( ) with the equilibrium constants KR for nucleophilic addition of water to X-[6+]. Correlation of first-order rate constants kp for deprotonation of X-[6+] ( ) and second-order rate constants ( hW for the microscopic reverse protonation of X-[7] by hydronium ion ( ) with the equilibrium constants Xaik for deprotonation of X-[6+]. The points at which equal rate constants are observed for reaction in the forward and reverse directions (log ATeq = 0) are indicated by arrows.

A rate equation is required for this reaction taking place in dilute solution. It is expected that reaction will be pseudo first-order in the forward direction and second-order in reverse. The reaction is studied in a laboratory batch reactor starting with a solution of methyl acetate and with no products present. In one test, the initial concentration of methyl acetate was 0.05 kmol/m3 and the fraction hydrolysed at various times subsequently was ... 

The tabulated data of rate versus concentration refer to a reaction that is believed of the second order in the forward direction and first order in reverse. Initial concentrations of the two reactants were 1.2 mol/cuft each and there was no product to start with, [a) Find the specific rates (b) How long does it take to convert 60% of the reactants ... 

In an experiment at 25°C, starting with pure compound C at 0.02250 mols/liter, the concentration of benzaldehyde was found to be 0.01025 mol/liter after 53.8 hr. The equilibrium constant is 0.424. The reaction is believed second order in the forward direction and first order in reverse. Find the specific rate, x = change in concentration of C C = C0-x = 0.0225 - x A = B = x... 

A scheme equivalent to our supposition 2 was put forward by Chmelir, Marek and Wichterle to explain the polymerisations initiated by aluminium bromide in heptane [11]. The fact that these reactions were of second order with respect to the initiator demanded an explanation in terms of a pre-initiation reaction between two molecules of initiator. 

A and B have the same retention time in this case the problem is similar to the case of a reaction of type A B+C with the difference that the forward reaction is of second order and very sensitive to the injected concentrations. 

Quantitative measurements of simple and enzyme-catalyzed reaction rates were under way by the 1850s. In that year Wilhelmy derived first order equations for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of sucrose which he could follow by the inversion of rotation of plane polarized light. Berthellot (1862) derived second-order equations for the rates of ester formation and, shortly after, Harcourt observed that rates of reaction doubled for each 10 °C rise in temperature. Guldberg and Waage (1864-67) demonstrated that the equilibrium of the reaction was affected by the concentration ) of the reacting substance(s). By 1877 Arrhenius had derived the definition of the equilbrium constant for a reaction from the rate constants of the forward and backward reactions. Ostwald in 1884 showed that sucrose and ester hydrolyses were affected by H+ concentration (pH). 

The forward and reverse second-order rate constants for reaction... 

One way to ensure that back reactions are not important is to measure initial rates. The initial rate is the limit of the reaction rate as time reaches zero. With an initial rate method, one plots the concentration of a reactant or product over a short reaction time period during which the concentrations of the reactants change so little that the instantaneous rate is hardly affected. Thus,by measuring initial rates, one can assume that only the forward reaction in Eq. (35) predominates. This would simplify the rate law to that given in Eq. (36) which as written would be a second-order reaction, first-order in reactant A and first-order in reactant B. Equation (35), under these conditions, would represent a second-order irreversible elementary reaction. 

For the sake of simplicity, hereafter the charge of the species is omitted. The preceding chemical reaction is assumed to be a chemically reversible process attributed with first-order forward (s ) and backward kb (s ) rate constants. In the real experimental systems, the forward chemical reaction is most frequently a second-order process ... 

Second-order rate constant of forward reaction, mol i Standard heterogeneous rate constant, ms ... 

The binding of a small molecule ligand to a protein receptor follows a bimolecu-lar association reaction with second-order kinetics. For the reversible reaction of a ligand L and a protein P to form a non-covalendy bound complex C at equilibrium, Eq. (1) applies where kon and kgS represent the forward and reverse mass transfer rate constants. 

Theoretical studies are primarily concentrated on the treatment of flame blow-off phenomenon and the prediction of flame spreading rates. Dunskii [12] is apparently the first to put forward the phenomenological theory of flame stabilization. The theory is based on the characteristic residence and combustion times in adjoining elementary volumes of fresh mixture and combustion products in the recirculation zone. It was shown in [13] that the criteria of [1, 2, 5] reduce to Dunskii s criterion. Longwell et al. [14] suggested the theory of bluff-body stabilized flames assuming that the recirculation zone in the wake of the baffle is so intensely mixed that it becomes homogeneous. The combustion is described by a second-order rate equation for the reaction of fuel and air. 

Note. Units of k and K are customary with concentrations in M and time in s. In the "Order" column the first number indicates the reaction order of the forward reaction, and the second number for the backward reaction. 

In summary, because the forward reaction rate constant is similar to the back reaction rate constant, the concentration evolution of a second-order isotopic exchange reaction often reduces to that of a first-order reaction (exponential evolution) but the rate "constants" and mean reaction time for the reduced reaction depend on total concentrations. 

Schiff s base formation occurs by condensation of the free amine base with aldehyde A in EtOAc/MeOff. The free amine base solution of glycine methyl ester in methanol is generated from the corresponding hydrochloride and triethylamine. Table 4 shows the reaction concentration profiles at 20-25°C. The Schiffs base formation is second order with respect to both the aldehyde and glycine ester. The equilibrium constant (ratio k(forward)/ k(reverse)) is calculated to be 67. 

---