Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formic acid potentials

Bulk aluminum may undergo the following dangerous interactions exothermic reaction with butanol, methanol, 2-propanol, or other alcohols, sodium hydroxide to release explosive hydrogen gas. Reaction with diborane forms pyrophoric product. Ignition on contact with niobium oxide + sulfur. Explosive reaction with molten metal oxides, oxosalts (nitrates, sulfates), sulfides, and sodium carbonate. Reaction with arsenic trioxide + sodium arsenate + sodium hydroxide produces the toxic arsine gas. Violent reaction with chlorine trifluoride, Incandescent reaction with formic acid. Potentially violent alloy formation with palladium, platinum at mp of Al, 600°C. Vigorous dissolution reaction in... [Pg.44]

Momany F A 1978 Determination of partial atomic charges from ab initio molecular electrostatic potentials. Application to formamide, methanol and formic acid J. Phys. Chem. 82 592... [Pg.216]

Finally, it must be restated that the biggest plus of this method is that it produces 70-80% MD-P2P or P2P, and 20-30% isosafrole or propenylbenzene as a side product. So if the chemist were to turn around and process that isosafrole using, say, the formic acid method 1, then the potential P2P production from this method could climb to well over 90% ... [Pg.75]

Lone pair donation from the hydroxyl oxygen makes the carbonyl group less elec trophilic than that of an aldehyde or ketone The graphic that opened this chapter is an electrostatic potential map of formic acid that shows the most electron rich site to be the oxygen of the carbonyl group and the most electron poor one to be as expected the OH hydrogen... [Pg.794]

Other potential processes for production of formic acid that have been patented but not yet commerciali2ed include Hquid-phase oxidation (31) of methanol to methyl formate, and hydrogenation of carbon dioxide (32). The catalytic dehydrogenation of methanol to methyl formate (33) has not yet been adapted for formic acid production. [Pg.504]

It is stated that in time the acidity (up to 2,5 units) of 0,1-1,0 M HMTA aqueous solutions changes maximally at 1°C, in comparatively to other temperatures (11, 16, 21°C). When the temperature arises the change of HMTA aqueous solutions pH values decreases in time. Formaldehyde and ammonium ions (end products of HMTA hydrolysis) have been fixed only in more diluted solutions (0,10 and 0,25M). The concentration of NH in them in some times is higher than H2C=0 concentration that is caused by oxidation of the last one to a formic acid, being accompanied by the change of the system platinum electrode potential. It is stated that concentration NH in solutions does not exceed 5% from HMTA general content. The conclusion the mechanism of HMTA destruction in H,0 to depend essentially on its concentration and temperature has been made. [Pg.38]

A calculation of tunneling splitting in formic acid dimer has been undertaken by Makri and Miller [1989] for a model two-dimensional polynomial potential with antisymmetric coupling. The semiclassical approximation exploiting a version of the sudden approximation has given A = 0.9cm" while the numerically exact result is 1.8cm" Since this comparison was the main goal pursued by this model calculation, the asymmetry caused by the crystalline environment has not been taken into account. [Pg.104]

In addition to the health hazards mentioned above, it is important be aware of the potential for explosions due to the Cannizzarro reaction ([77], pp. 36-37). When strong alkali is mixed with formaldehyde solutions, the Cannizzarro reaction will result in a rapid and spontaneous reaction even at relatively low temperatures. Depending on conditions, an induction period may be seen. The main organic products of this reaction are methanol and formic acid (salt form). In addition, significant amounts of hydrogen are evolved. The potential for explosions in closed containers is high, and even open containers will often erupt. [Pg.875]

Display electrostatic potential maps for water, ethanol, formic acid and propanoic acid, and examine the value of the electrostatic potential at the most electron-poor site. What causes a larger change in electrostatic potential, switching the alkyl group for H, or changing the structure of the acidic functional group ... [Pg.55]

Electrostatic potential map for formic acid shows negatively-charged regions (in red) and positively-charged regions (in blue). [Pg.55]

Formate ion, bond lengths in, 757 electrostatic potential map of, 757 Formic acid, bond lengths in. 757 pKa of, 756 Formyl group, 697 p-Formyl benzoic acid, p/C, of, 760 Fourier-transform NMR spectroscopy (FT-NMR), 447-448 Fractional crystallization, resolution and, 307... [Pg.1298]

Fig. 8-10. Potential energy diagram for the uncatalyzed decomposition of formic acid. Fig. 8-10. Potential energy diagram for the uncatalyzed decomposition of formic acid.
The cyclization of 5-hydrazine-6-arylthio[l,2,4[triazin-3(2//)-ones 849 was effected by formic acid to give 950 (74MIP1). They are potentially useful as antibacterial, antiviral, and antimetabolic agents. Cyclization of... [Pg.143]

The free-radical scheme, however, fails to account for the following (i) It cannot be easily generalised to cover the identical kinetics of the Mn(lII) sulphate oxidation if -CH(C02H) has an oxidation potential comparable with Mn(Ill)/ Mn(II) pyrophosphate then it cannot appreciably reoxidise Mn(ll) sulphate, (a) If -CH(C02H) reoxidises Mn(II) sulphate then it should be capable of re-oxidising both V(1V) sulphate (of the V(V)/V(IV) pair, potential 1.0 V) and Mn(II) sulphate in the V(V) oxidation of malonic acid that it does neither can be seen from the rate laws of these oxidations which show no Mn(II)-retardation vide infra). Hi) The not dissimilar kinetics of the Mn(III) sulphate oxidation of formic acid vide supra) and mercurous ion °. [Pg.401]

Within the general mechanism for the oxidation of Ci molecules, proposed by Bagotzsky, formic acid is one of the simplest cases, since it requires only the transfer of two electrons for the complete oxidation to CO2 [Bagotzky et al., 1977]. In fact, it has the same oxidation valency as CO both require two electrons for complete oxidation to CO2. When compared with CO, the reaction mechanism of formic acid is more complex although the catalysis of the oxidation reaction is much easier. In fact, formic acid can be readily oxidized at potentials as low as 0.2 V (vs. RHE). Its reaction mechanism takes place according to the well-established dual path mechanism [Capon and Parsons, 1973a, b] ... [Pg.177]

The qualitative voltammetric behavior of methanol oxidation on Pt is very similar to that of formic acid. The voltammetry for the oxidation of methanol on Pt single crystals shows a clear hysteresis between the positive- and negative-going scans due to the accumulation of the poisoning intermediate at low potentials and its oxidation above 0.7 V (vs. RHE) [Lamy et al., 1982]. Additionally, the reaction is also very sensitive to the surface stmcture. The order in the activity of the different low index planes of Pt follows the same order than that observed for formic acid. Thus, the Pt(l 11) electrode has the lowest catalytic activity and the smallest hysteresis, indicating that both paths of the reaction are slow, whereas the Pt( 100) electrode displays a much higher catalytic activity and a fast poisoning reaction. As before, the activity of the Pt(l 10) electrode depends on the pretreatment of the surface (Fig. 6.17). [Pg.184]

Corrigan DS, Weaver MJ. 1988. Mechanisms of formic acid, methanol, and carbon monoxide electrooxidation at platinum as examined by single potential alteration infrared spectroscopy. J Electroanal Chem 241 143-162. [Pg.200]

SamjeskeG, Miki A, YeS, Yamakata A,Mukouyama Y, Okamoto H, OsawaM. 2005. Potential oscillations in galvanostatic electrooxidation of formic acid on platinum A time-resolved surface-enhanced infrared study. J Phys Chem B 109 23509-23516. [Pg.205]

Figure 12.14 SFG spectra of the carbonyls formed during formic acid decomposition on a Pt(lll) electrode in 0.1 M H2SO4 electrolyte containing 0.1 M formic acid. The spectral position is typical of atop CO on the Pt(l 11) surface. Times at which the spectra have been recorded are from 2 to 496 s, yielding HCOOH decomposition kinetics at three electrode potentials, -0.200, -0.025, and 0.225 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Figure 12.14 SFG spectra of the carbonyls formed during formic acid decomposition on a Pt(lll) electrode in 0.1 M H2SO4 electrolyte containing 0.1 M formic acid. The spectral position is typical of atop CO on the Pt(l 11) surface. Times at which the spectra have been recorded are from 2 to 496 s, yielding HCOOH decomposition kinetics at three electrode potentials, -0.200, -0.025, and 0.225 V vs. Ag/AgCl.
Overall, we demonstrated electrode potential- and time-dependent properties of the atop CO adsorbate generated from the formic acid decomposition process at three potentials, and addressed the issues of formic acid reactivity and poisoning [Samjeske and Osawa, 2005 Chen et al., 2003,2006]. There is also a consistency with the previous kinetic data obtained by electrochemical methods the maximum in formic acid decomposition rates was obtained at —0.025 V vs. Ag/AgCl or 0.25 V vs. RHE (cf. Fig. 12.7 in [Lu et al., 1999]). However, the exact path towards the CO formation is not clear, as the main reaction is the oxidation of the HCOOH molecule ... [Pg.393]

In the following, after a brief description of the experimental setup and procedures (Section 13.2), we will first focus on the adsorption and on the coverage and composition of the adlayer resulting from adsorption of the respective Cj molecules at a potential in the Hup range as determined by adsorbate stripping experiments (Section 13.3.1). Section 13.3.2 deals with bulk oxidation of the respective reactants and the contribution of the different reaction products to the total reaction current under continuous electrolyte flow, first in potentiodynamic experiments and then in potentiostatic reaction transients, after stepping the potential from 0.16 to 0.6 V, which was chosen as a typical reaction potential. The results are discussed in terms of a mechanism in which, for methanol and formaldehyde oxidation, the commonly used dual-pathway mechanism is extended by the possibility that reaction intermediates can desorb as incomplete oxidation products and also re-adsorb for further oxidation (for the formic acid oxidation mechanism, see [Samjeske and Osawa, 2005 Chen et al., 2006a, b Miki et al., 2004]). [Pg.415]

In this section, we will present and discuss cyclic voltammetry and potential-step DBMS data on the electro-oxidation ( stripping ) of pre-adsorbed residues formed upon adsorption of formic acid, formaldehyde, and methanol, and compare these data with the oxidative stripping of a CO adlayer formed upon exposure of a Pt/ Vulcan catalyst to a CO-containing (either CO- or CO/Ar-saturated) electrolyte as reference. We will identify adsorbed species from the ratio of the mass spectrometric and faradaic stripping charge, determine the adsorbate coverage relative to a saturated CO adlayer, and discuss mass spectrometric and faradaic current transients after adsorption at 0.16 V and a subsequent potential step to 0.6 V. [Pg.417]

Oxidation of the adsorbed species resulting from interaction with formaldehyde, formic acid, and methanol, respectively, leads to stripping peaks that are downshifted to more negative potentials. Furthermore, the adsorbate coverage is significantly lower... [Pg.418]


See other pages where Formic acid potentials is mentioned: [Pg.219]    [Pg.1310]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.868]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.423]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.105 ]




SEARCH



Electrostatic potential map formic acid

© 2024 chempedia.info