Formate, buffer capacity

You carry out a reaction in an organic solvent. The reaction is catalysed by a lipase immobilised by adsorption on a porous support. The reaction virtually stops long before equilibrium is reached and you suspect that this can be due to the formation of an acidic reaction product. What can you do to increase the buffering capacity of the system ... 

Minor differences between the three electrolyte solutions are also observed. First, electrolyte number 3 only shows a peak maximum in the current-potential curves at potentials higher than 8 V. However, this is very clear because its pH value is smaller, indicating that this electrolyte solution possesses a higher buffer capacity against consumption of hydrogen ions in the vicinity of the fibre surface, avoiding hydrogen gas formation and Ni(OH)2 precipitation. Secondly, at a potential of 4V, no deposition occurred in electrolyte solution number 3, indicated by the absence of an increase in the measured electrical current and confirmed by XPS data. Additionally in this case, the lower pH plays an important role because of the lower pH value, the applied potential difference does not overlap with the potential window in which the reduction of Ni(II) occurs. Therefore no deposition is observed. 

Besides the presumable alterations of bacterial adhesion, plaque formation, and salivary defense mechanisms detailed previously, some more or less-specifically detectable changes of saliva are in connection with caries formation, and it may be used for recognizing risk patients and to maintain prevention. Decreased saliva flow rate, decreased buffer capacity, increased number of S. mutans and Lactobacilli in saliva are usually associated with increased caries prevalence. Similarly, decreased level of certain salivary proteins such as proline-rich proteins (PRPl, PRP3), histatin 1, and statherin is associated with significantly higher caries-susceptibility (3, 21). 

Other workers in the past, however, Baltzer (B7, B8), Bonis and Kalk (B26, K3), Bucher (B43, B44), Kapp (K7), MitcheU (M41), and Udaondo and Zunino (U3), considered that mucin plays no significant role in the buffering of HCl in the stomach, and that the frequently described decrease in mucus content in peptic ulcer may be instrumental in ulcer formation by a mechanism other than decrease of its buffering capacity. 

Some CRC, however, don t differ sufficiently from carnosine by their proton buffering capacity (acetylated dipeptides) or have pKa in an alkaline area (carcinine). Their formation in tissues has to be induced by other metabolic needs. 

A buffer is frequently used in reversed-phase LC to reduce the piotolysis of ionogenic analytes, which in ionic form show little retention. Phosphate buffers are widely applied for that purpose, since they span a wide pH range and show good buffer capacity. The use of buffers is obhgatory in real world applications, e.g., quantitative bioanalysis, where many of the matrix components are ionogenic. LC-MS puts constraints to the type of buffers that can be used in practice. Phosphate buffers must be replaced by volatile alternatives, e.g., ammonium formate, acetate or carbonate. 

Despite these considerations, the first approach in method development for ESl-MS is the formation of preformed ions in solution, i.e., protonation of basic analytes or deprotonation of acidic analytes. Thus, for basic analytes, mixtures of ammonium salts and volatile acids like formic and acetic acid are applied. Alternatively, formic or acetic acid may be added to the mobile phase, just to set a low pH for the generation of preformed ions in solution. The latter approach is successful if sufficient hydrophobic interaction between preformed aiialyte ions and the reversed-phase material remains. The concentration of buffer is kept as low as possible, i.e., at or below 10 nunol/1 in ESl-MS. The buffer concentration is obviously determined by the buffer capacity needed to achieve stable pH conditions upon repetitive injection of the samples. Constantopoulos et al. [99] derived an equilibrium partitioning model to predict the effect of the salt concentration on the analyte response in ESI. If the salt concentration is below 10 moFl, the analyte response is proportional to its concentration. The response is found to decrease with increasing salt concentration. 

The pronounced effects of pH on enzyme reactions emphasize the need to control this variable by means of adequate buffer solutions. Enzyme assays should be carried out at the pH of optimal activity, because the pH-activity curve has its minimum slope near this pH, and a small variation in pH will cause a minimal change in enzyme activity. The buffer system must be capable of counteracting the effect of adding the specimen (e.g, serum itself is a powerful buffer) to the assay system, and the effects of acids or bases formed during the reaction (e.g., formation of fatty acids by the action of lipase). Because buffers have their maximimi buffering capacity close to their pK values, whenever possible a buffer system should be chosen with a pK value within IpH unit of the desired pH of the assay (see Chapter 1). Interaction between buffer ions and other components of the assay system (e.g., activating metal ions) may eliminate certain buffers from consideration. 

Boundary potential, E, The resultant of two potentials that develop at the surfaces of a glass membrane electrode. Bronsted-Lowry acids and bases An acid of this type is defined as a proton donor and a base as a proton acceptor the loss of a proton by an acid results in the formation of a species that is a potential proton acceptor, or conjugate base of the parent acid. Buffer capacity The number of moles of strong acid (or strong base) needed to alter the pH of 1.00 L of a buffer solution by 1.00 unit. 

---